Beltran




Exit Carlos Beltran

I started and scrapped this post a couple times. To be honest, I tried to pre-write it the way newspapers do with celebrity obituaries, though by the time I got around to actually doing so the news of Carlos Beltran’s trade had already started to leak out. And I meant to hold off on publishing it until the deal was made official, but now Beltran is out of the Mets’ lineup tonight and it sounds by all accounts like the announcement is a mere formality.

The first draft included an introduction explaining how real sadness is universal and comes in near-infinite supply, and how in that context Beltran’s departure is not really sad at all. But that’s patronizing. Presumably you know that sadness is a relative thing, and you can distinguish sadness for actual tragedies from the sadness we feel when a favorite baseball player is traded across the country to play out the final few months of his contract with a new team.

There’s no good reason to dwell on it now regardless. Any Mets fan paying attention the last couple of months has heard about and likely reasoned through Beltran’s being moved, a deal that makes a whole lot of sense for a club with little chance of a postseason berth in 2011.

In the trade with the Giants, Sandy Alderson reportedly scored Zack Wheeler, a young player better than the ones many – especially me – expected the Mets would get in return for Beltran. Wheeler is a Single-A pitcher so he’s still a ways off from contributing in the big leagues, but he’s a former first-round draft pick twice ranked in Baseball America’s top 100 prospects and with over 10 strikeouts per nine innings in the Minors.

And Beltran’s exit provides one final excuse to celebrate the man’s career in Flushing. In his tenure with the Mets, Beltran played 831 games. He hit 148 home runs, drove in 552 runs, stole 100 bases, and posted an .867 OPS. Statistically, his 2006 campaign stands among the very best seasons any position player has ever provided the club. He ranks in the team’s all time Top 10 of too many categories to bother listing.

That feels like it’s somehow understating it though, no?

Not long ago, a Kansas City Star reporter wrote, “If you want to know how to approach the game, teammates or life, watch Jeff Francoeur.” Though the author was merely upholding the rich journalistic tradition of writing ridiculous things about Jeff Francoeur, the comment rightfully inspired a ton of hilarious Internet snark.

Swap in Beltran for Francoeur, though, and the guy has a much better point.

And I don’t mean in terms of off-field stuff. We only think we know baseball players from what little they reveal of themselves to the press and the fans: We heard Terry Collins rave about Beltran’s leadership this year, we read about his charitable efforts and saw the professional way in which he handled every single one of the incessant questions about his future, but for all any of us know Beltran punts puppies on his home from the ballpark.

Let’s accept that we don’t really know Beltran as a person and just think about the ballplayer. Could you imagine what the world would be like if we could all do everything the way Beltran plays baseball? If we demonstrated that same elegance and efficiency in our morning commutes, our jobs, our yardwork? What if we could all stay so calm and so patient under pressure, and remain so humble upon success? What a place that would be!

Or would that entire world be mistaken for joyless?

Oh, whatever. I made it this far without mentioning the infernal haters, and it’s probably best to just leave them stewing in their pathetic corners, pissed about whatever it is they’ve chosen to be pissed about next. Let’s applaud Beltran now, not waste time defending him from those that will never understand. Know this: People who don’t appreciate Carlos Beltran by now don’t deserve to.

I’m going to rehash the point I made in regards to Jose Reyes earlier this summer. I apologize for repeating myself: What we’ve seen from Beltran is ours to keep forever, no matter what team he’s playing for tomorrow. Carlos Beltran playing baseball at the peak of his ability is a beautiful sight to behold, and we got to watch it hundreds of times.

The sad thing about baseball is that greatness is fleeting. The awesome thing about baseball – or one of the many, at least – is that more great players and great moments are always on the way. Who knows? Maybe Zack Wheeler is one of them.

So Beltran is off to San Francisco to put the Giants’ putrid offense on his shoulders, and we’ll watch him in the playoffs then hear unsubstantiated and likely fruitless rumors that the Mets are pursuing him in the offseason.

I’m not sure how to wrap this up. Last time through I had some dumb story about the old-man version of me, 30 years in the future, describing Beltran to some punk kid. But it sucked and now I’ve got a train to catch. So we move forward.

Carlos Beltran may be traded to the Giants

For Zack Wheeler, supposedly. But need I remind you:

That’s not to single out Buster Olney. About as many people were reporting Lee to the Yankees last year as are reporting Beltran to the Giants today. I’m not saying it won’t happen, or that Lee wasn’t, for all I know, extremely close to becoming a Yankee. I’m just saying I’m not going to waste any more words on it until I see the team press release or Beltran suiting up in another uniform.

The human element

The stupid, stupid Braves took a walk-off victory over the lovable, upstart Pirates in the 19th inning last night on this call. No doubt you know about it already because the Internet is on fire this morning. What’s to be done about these terrible umpires?

Umpire Jerry Meals admitted, upon viewing the replay, that he blew the call. He said he thought Pirates catcher Michael McKenry missed the tag, so he ruled Julio Lugo safe. So that sucks. It sucks for the Pirates and their fans, most of all, but it sucks for Meals and it sucks for baseball to have an otherwise awesome game end on an umpiring mistake.

But I am still not convinced that umpiring is getting worse. I’ve been through this before. Why would it be? Has there been a massive overhaul in personnel? Have the standards for umpires slipped? The players are getting better, the executives shrewder. Every other aspect of baseball, we think, is improving as the game is honed and sharpened with time. Why would just this one be systematically decaying?

All games are broadcast in high definition now, with more camera angles and HD super slow-mo replay. We notice more umpiring mistakes because we have the technology with which to see them. Plays that we might have shrugged off as close calls five years ago we now know to be wrong and cite as evidence in the case for robot umpires.

Plus, there’s confirmation bias at play. We have decided that umpiring has gotten worse, so every time a bad call is made, we say, “oh, another bad call! Man, the umpiring has sucked this year!” But as far as I know there’s no good way to prove that the quality of umpiring actually has changed, since there’s no way to retroactively watch games from the 50s in HD with all these camera angles.

(I am open to this possibility, though I’m probably letting my imagination run wild here: It could be that the new technologies have put so much pressure on umpires that they now overthink calls like the one last night, in which the ball beat Lugo to the plate by several feet.)

Of course, that’s immaterial. Even if it has always been this way, it can still be improved. There’s no reason to hamper the game any more than it should be by the human element, and if there’s a way to conveniently add a replay official to clear up close calls in an efficient manner, so be it.

But — and I think this came up in the comments section here before — expanding replay in baseball exposes the league to some rather nefarious possibilities. Unlike those in the NFL, most baseball broadcasts are handled by regional sports networks in contract with teams. Those networks stand to benefit if the teams they cover succeed. I’ve seen the way things work inside regional sports networks and I don’t imagine such conspiracies would exactly run rampant, but expanding replay in the game would mean putting some small element of how the game is judged into partial hands.

And last I checked, robots can’t even make pancakes or fold laundry. Screaming about this stuff is great fun, I realize, but for now, maybe it’s best we all settle down, accept that humans mess stuff up constantly, and start coming up with real, feasible solutions.

Johan Santana about to do stuff

The Mets announced yesterday that Johan Santana will make a rehab start in Port St. Lucie tomorrow, which is awesome because it means we’re that much closer (fingers crossed) to seeing Johan Santana do stuff.

Color me surprised, and still a bit skeptical. Shoulder surgeries like the one Santana endured tend to be pretty damning for pitchers, and though Santana is his own unique, strong, fiercely competitive snowflake, it’s hard to imagine the remainder of his rehab proceeding without any hiccups given the precedents.

But we can hope, of course. Watching Johan Santana pitch, with or without his good fastball, has been one of the great joys of being a Mets fan the last few years. And if this September won’t feature meaningful games, it’d be nice if it could feature Santana — not to mention give the team some idea of what to expect from Santana moving forward.

I know I said I was ignoring this…

But Patrick Flood takes a much more detailed look at what the Mets can expect in return for Carlos Beltran and comes to a pretty similar conclusion to the one I reached last week. Only his version has a lot more substance. I fear many Mets fans may have set their hopes unreasonably high based on the first reports that leaked out about the team’s demands. But the other thing is, we’ll find out really soon one way or the other.

Justin Turner: A starter?

Over at Amazin’ Avenue, Eric Simon examines Justin Turner’s rookie season. While the conclusion makes sense — Turner should be relegated to the bench with Daniel Murphy starting at second and Lucas Duda at first — I’d add a couple of points to defend our man Turner:

First, though Turner’s batting average on balls in play may have been extremely high before June, it was also extremely low in June, and now back up in July. Across the largest possible sample — the whole season — it’s a very reasonable .312; these things have a way of evening out.

Turner’s .277/.343/.365 line does not appear to be aided by luck, and is in fact slightly better than the Major League average .256/.319/.379 mark for second basemen in 2011. By wOBA, Turner has been right around the middle of the pack of second basemen with more than 300 plate appearances.

Of course, the idea is to have good hitters at every position, not just average ones. And if Murphy can capably field the keystone, the Mets might very well have that in house. But Turner — based on his first half-season, at least — appears more than adequate in a utility role or filling the short half of a platoon at second.

That’s worth something. Remember how we all went on and on about how teams should be able to find a cost-controlled guy for the Alex Cora job that’s better than Alex Cora so they don’t have to pay Alex Cora? Here you go: Justin Turner.

And yeah, I realize that saying a guy is better than Alex Cora is pretty much the definition of damning with faint praise, plus none of this contradicts any of what Simon said in his original post. I guess I’m saying we should be thankful that the Mets are now in a situation wherein we can legitimately argue that a 26-year-old second baseman with an above-average OPS for his position should be benched, because it shows how quickly the new administration (and the last one in its final days) have worked to foster organizational depth.

I’d still give Turner some starts against lefties to keep him in the mix, though he hasn’t demonstrated any platoon split to speak of. I’ll add that it’s funny how first impressions work: It seems like there are a lot of Mets fans ready to anoint Turner second-baseman-for-life and send Duda packing on the next bus to Buffalo.