Whoa

This Tweet blew my mind:

 

I did some Google research and found this, the back of Lansford’s 1987 Topps card:

 

But — but! — there’s nothing about Sir Francis Drake on Lansford’s Wikipedia page and in fact, an old edit of the Wikipedia page that’s now archived on a Carney Lansford Facebook fan page says:

According to his 1988 Topps baseball card, Lansford is a direct descendant of the British privateer Sir Francis Drake. However, this is extremely unlikely since Drake is not known to have fathered any children.

And indeed, Sir Francis Drake’s Wikipedia page confirms that he had no children, though who really knows with those pirate types?

Anyway, if the lineage is fictional, I wonder who made it up. I’m not sure if it’d be funnier if the lie came from Lansford himself or from the guy writing the blurb on the back of the baseball card. I feel like if I had that job that’s exactly the type of thing I’d make up and try to slip in there to see if anyone noticed. But then it’s also really funny if one day in 1986 Carney Lansford was all, “yeah, I’m just going to tell this sucker from Topps that I’m a direct descendant of Sir Francis Drake, see if he buys it. I mean, I kind of look like him.”

The least funny scenario is that Carney Lansford’s father or grandfather made it up, and Carney Lansford grew up really proud to be a direct descendant of Sir Francis Drake and is only finding out right now from this blog post that he’s been living a lie. If that’s the case, sorry, dude. Nice mustache.

St. Lucie and the sticker bush

Disclaimer: This post represents an effort of Trachsellian efficiency. It’s something I considered for weeks then hammered out in a few frustrated hours this morning because I didn’t want to think about it anymore. If it seems a bit disjointed, that’s why. Also, it contains an anecdote from religion because I think it’s thematically relevant, not because this site espouses or endorses any religion.

When I was six or seven, sometime after the Mets won their last World Series but before we lost hope that the same group of mustachioed heroes could do it again, I was playing wiffle ball against my neighbor in my backyard and fouled one into the sticker bushes that separated our properties.

This happened with some frequency, and often we could use the bat to poke the ball out through the other side of the bush. This time, though, our efforts just pushed the ball deeper into the weave of thorns until finally it became stuck between branches, firmly entrenched. We stood there staring at it until my mom spotted us from inside the house. She stepped out, walked over, and without hesitation jammed her arm deep into the bush, grabbed the ball, pulled it out, handed it to me and walked back inside. Some badass mom stuff, and pretty indicative of my family’s approach to pain. More on that in a bit.

Plenty of stories have emerged from Mets camp in Port St. Lucie: Daniel Murphy is playing second base. Terry Collins has a buddy who owned a bear. Nearly every player on the roster has been hurt or nicked up or diagnosed with something at some point. Mike Pelfrey is struggling to retire Grapefruit League hitters. Unheralded Minor League lefty Josh Edgin has become much-heralded Minor League lefty Josh Edgin.

But make no mistake: There should be no bigger takeaway from Port St. Lucie this spring than the apparent health (or procession toward health) of the Mets’ one-time ace, Johan Santana.

I say “one-time ace” because Santana hasn’t pitched in a real game in over a year, because the road back from shoulder surgery is rarely a smooth one, and because calling him the team’s ace outright seems unfair to R.A. Dickey. But in and around Mets camp, everything about Santana screams superstar. His is a massive, charismatic, electric presence. He commands the attention of every eye and camera nearby; his quips light up a weary clubhouse on muggy mornings; his swagger in bullpen sessions draws entertained smiles from the most grizzled of old baseball men. As a credentialed member of the media covering the team I’m trying to remain vaguely professional here, but screw it: Johan Santana is totally awesome and cool.

In terms of on-field production, I am convinced, that means basically nothing. Santana is worth as much to the Mets as he contributes on the field, and what he can contribute on the field in 2012 remains to be seen. But I think his demeanor -– his persistent ace-ness despite not having thrown a big-league pitch since Sept. 2, 2010, and while fighting his way back from a surgery that has ended lesser careers -– speaks to something maybe even more important than the fate of this year’s Mets.

The O.G. St. Lucie — or Lucy or Lucia depending on what language you speak — lived in Sicily around the turn of the fourth century. According to the legend –- and I’m simplifying it — she was arranged to marry a wealthy, powerful man that she did not want to marry. For refusing, she was sentenced to a brothel, then tortured and eventually killed. According to this version of the story, upon her sentencing, she said this:

“You cannot bend my will to your purpose; whatever you do to my body, that cannot happen to me.”

More disclaiming: I obviously don’t mean to equate what Johan Santana’s going through or any of the other stuff I’m going to get to later in this post with martyrdom. I just like the quote. “Whatever you do to my body, that cannot happen to me.” Badass.

Here’s my deal: I have a pair of incurable but non-terminal auto-immune diseases -– multiple sclerosis and Crohn’s disease. I’m not seeking pity and I don’t want to bog this post down with personal medical history, but it turns out they can team up to be a real pain in the ass sometimes. I’m lucky in that I’ve avoided the worst of both, but I found out about the M.S. because a side effect of medication I was taking for Crohn’s amplified the symptoms. I went off that medication upon the M.S. diagnosis in 2008 and suffered a Crohn’s flare-up this summer. I went on steroids to calm it, started absorbing food again and gained a bunch of weight*. The weight puts extra stress on my back that’s already aching from the M.S., but working out to try to drop that weight –- as I did this morning –- makes my back hurt more. And painkillers can trigger the Crohn’s disease again.

It’s frustrating sometimes, no doubt, but it’s not something I talk about or even think about that often. That’s part of why I struggled to get this post out, I think. And the last thing I want is to turn this into some sort of inspirational Tony Robbins screed, and for all I know I’ll change my stance on the following if and when I find myself in worse shape down the road. But what I’ve gotten from all of it — not something I’ve learned, but something I think was already ingrained in me that I’ve come to understand through a decade’s worth of medical nonsense — is this: You can’t let what hurts you define you.

It’s pointless. Maybe for some, pain is so overwhelming that it’s impossible not to, and maybe it’s unfair for me as someone still relatively healthy to even say that. But if you can bear it, there’s no sense dwelling on it. You should treat it, certainly, and describe it to your medical professional and even complain about it to your loved ones if you find that therapeutic. Then try to think about something else. My back hurts. In July my stomach hurt. Probably something hurts you too. What can you do but deal with it and carry on?

Which brings me, in an extraordinarily roundabout fashion, to the point of this post. Being a Mets fan is not an auto-immune disease, though it might sometimes feel that way. And being a Mets fan these past few years has been rough, at least relative to being a fan of most other teams or being a Mets fan back in the late 80s. If I listed the reasons why here, this would border on book length.

Maybe the pervasive, persistent negativity that seems to have gripped most of the fanbase is something therapeutic, or provides some sense of community. Maybe people still laugh at the same tired jokes we’ve all been making for three years. I can’t speak for you. But just like I didn’t become a baseball fan to follow high-stakes financial dramas, I definitely didn’t become a baseball fan to have it break my spirit, to start approaching every single inkling of news –- good and bad –- about my team with snark and cynicism and woe-is-me stuff.

Rooting for a team means emotionally investing in something, and that brings with it the risk of some pain –- not lasting physical pain, but pain nonetheless. But when that pain comes like it has the last few years, what’s the sense in wallowing in it?

Especially with baseball. It’s baseball. Baseball. For one thing, you can opt out at any time. If the Mets actually make you miserable, stop following the Mets. If you can’t or won’t, I suggest for the sake of your sanity finding whatever small shred of hope you have for the upcoming season and seizing it, rather than floundering about in so much Met-fan self-pity.

Because right now it kind of feels like we –- and I certainly include myself here -– spend a hell of a lot of time poking at the sticker bush, thinking about it and whining about it and generally making things worse for ourselves, when we could save ourselves a lot of time and anguish by just reaching into the thorns and gripping the baseball inside.

Lastly: Some fellow Mets fans are putting on a concert to benefit the M.S. Association of America on Thursday night. They’re raffling off a bunch of stuff, including a guitar signed by My Chemical Romance, and proceeds will help M.S. patients less fortunate than me. I’ll be there, and if you come I will regale you with stories about how cool Johan Santana is.

*- I also moved to the city, where there are way more delicious food options available within walking distance of my home. That’s clearly part of it. It just didn’t fit with the narrative. Journalism!

Just a reminder

I’ve seen several Mets fans suggest lately that if Johan Santana pitches well, he’ll be dealt at the trade deadline.

The Mets owe Santana $55 million over the next two years (including the $5.5 million buyout). That is, I believe, the most any pitcher in baseball will make over that stretch.

For the Mets to find a taker for Santana’s contract in 2012, he’s going to have to stay healthy and pitch extremely well — think vintage Johan Santana. And even then, it might be tough to find some team desperate enough this July to take on Santana, coming off shoulder surgery, and commit to paying him the $31 million he’s owed in 2013.

Which is to say: It’s probably not worth fretting about the possibility that Santana pitches well and the Mets trade him during the season. Not only is it unlikely, but it’d be a huge boon for the Mets. Santana is awesome, granted, but there are better ways for a rebuilding team to invest $31 million than in one season of a 34-year-old with past shoulder issues.

Mets over-under

Context: Ronny Cedeno has a career .286 on-base percentage, but it has been .297 since he joined the Pirates in the middle of the 2009 campaign. The Mets have emphasized plate discipline under hitting coach Dave Hudgens, and Terry Collins specifically noted earlier this spring that they’d asked Cedeno to work on getting on base more. No one with more than 60 plate appearances for the 2011 Mets finished with an OBP below .300.

[poll id=”98″]

Various Mets stuff

And baseball has been even more unfair to batters facing Johan Santana. Because for the batter facing Johan Santana, somewhere in that sequence of windup and pitch, this batter has to notice that the car traveling ahead of him is, in fact, slamming on its brakes without any warning from the brake lights. He’s gotta see the Santana changeup, recognize a difference in arm speed, or the delivery, or something. When Santana’s on, it’s impossible because there isn’t any difference. Those panic swings and bats flying into the stands on Santana changeups are the brakes being slammed and steering wheels being pulled towards the shoulder just a little too late. And those smoother, way-out-in-front whiffs on Santana’s changeups, that deceptive grace is really the mark of the badly, badly fooled – those hitters rammed full speed into the car in front of them, never noticing that anything had slowed down.

Patrick Flood, PatrickFloodBlog.com.

Flood returns from Port St. Lucie with a couple thousand words, all of which are worth reading. That’s far more worthwhile than anything that’ll follow in this post, so click through, check it out then come on back.

As for other recent Mets stuff:

– The Mets are apparently finalizing a Minor League deal with Chris Young. Good. It’s no safe bet he’ll be healthy at all this season, but every team could use starting pitching depth and there’s very little risked in giving Young a Minor League deal. If he comes back in August and makes four starts, it’s a win for the Mets.

– David Wright is playing today. That’s excellent news, assuming he’s playing because he’s fully healthy and not because this is the latest he can possibly start playing games to get himself ready for Opening Day.

– Spring Training stats are still mostly meaningless.

– I’m going to the Mets’ “All-Star Dining Line-up” at Citi Field tonight to sample the various new food options being offered at Citi this season. It’s going to be a bloodbath.

– Chase Utley will miss the start of the season with chondromalacia in his knees and there’s no timetable for his return. In Utley’s absence, the Phillies will likely start Freddy Galvis, a 22-year-old with 121 at-bats above Double-A and a .613 career Minor League OPS (though to Galvis’ credit, he has been young for every level). Last week Ryan Howard started playing catch and taking grounders while seated on a stool. Without Howard and Utley, the Phillies’ lineup looks awfully mediocre. The pitching staff still looks phenomenal, though. And 1/5 of it looks like this.

This almost certainly won’t happen, but does anyone think the Phillies might trade something of some value for Justin Turner? Do the Mets have enough confidence in Daniel Murphy at second base to do something like that?

– The Mets now have five little yellow crosses signifying injuries on their MLBDepthCharts page. The Braves have four, the Marlins have two, the Phillies have five and the Nationals have six.

Mets over-under

Context: 25-year-old Chris Schwinden looks likely to start the season sixth on the Mets’ starting pitching depth chart — pitching every fifth day in Buffalo and getting the first call whenever someone in the big league club’s rotation needs to miss a couple of turns. Schwinden started four games for the Mets in 2012.

The Major League Mets will probably carry Miguel Batista, who could make a spot start here and there. Schwinden is on the Mets’ 40-man roster, as are fellow Triple-A starter Jeremy Hefner and prospect Jeurys Familia. Familia threw 87 2/3 innings in Double-A in 2011 and could start the year in Triple-A as well. Matt Harvey also figures to play into the Mets’ rotation discussion later in the season.

[poll id=”97″]

Mets over-under

Context: Because the Mets appear distant longshots to take the NL East in 2012, because they’re coming off three straight losing seasons and because we live in a world with ever-shrinking grey areas, someone will inevitably suggest that the 2012 Mets will vie with their 1962 predecessors for the worst record in Major League history.

Barring catastrophe, the 2012 Mets should win way more than 40 games. The 1962 Mets were almost unimaginably bad, and unlucky on top of that.

The 2009 Mets won their 41st game on July 11, the 2010 Mets won it on June 23, and the 2011 Mets won it on June 29. July 9 this year marks the beginning of the All-Star Break. The game on July 8 will be the Mets’ 86th game of the season. Also, my dad’s birthday.

[poll id=”96″]