Lambeau bleeped?

Up they go, the exuberant Pack, into the stands at Curly Lambeau Field, glorying in yet another TD pass from Aaron Rodgers to… somebody. And once the Packers start leaping, there is no stopping them. They will leap again and again on Sunday in the NFC divisional playoff game, you can be sure of it.

Where is the outrage over this stunt? It’s just not happening. The No Fun League somehow sanctions the celebration, says The Leap is fine. The Giants say it’s OK by them. A Facebook community called, “Ban the Lambeau Leap,” has only 16 “likes” after 14 months.

“I think it’s great,” Giant center Kevin Boothe said of the Leap. “I don’t want to see it on Sunday, but they can do it again after Sunday. It’s not showing anybody up. It’s for the fans.”

Filip Bondy, N.Y. Daily News.

There are a bunch of people in my Twitter timeline worked up about the get-off-my-lawniness of this column’s — or actually, its headline’s — suggestion that the Lambeau leap be banished or punished, but the actual content of Bondy’s piece reads more tongue-in-cheek than sanctimonious. And I haven’t seen the print edition of today’s Daily News, but I’d guess this came as part of a playoff preview package full of the civic-pride stuff typical in newspapers around most postseason series, building up our city and tearing yours down, all in good fun. Better take shots at the Lambeau Leap than cheese, no?

For the record, this site endorses nearly all post-touchdown celebrations. I think they should be avoided when your team is down by multiple touchdowns due in large part to your own fumbling because they then make you look like a fool, but otherwise, you know, go to town.

And after spirited internal debate, I think I’m even cool with the NFL’s harsh stance toward post-touchdown celebrations, as ridiculous as it seems. If there were no such thing, maybe too many scores would be celebrated in over-the-top fashion and the one-upsmanship would spiral out of control until no one paid any attention anymore. The more I think about it, the more it seems like a brilliant turn by the league to position itself as the humorless bad cop, incapable of fully controlling those lovable punk-rock miscreants who’ll happily incur fines to express themselves freely.

Something to consider while you watch Eli Manning

Earlier this week, Mike Salfino at SNY Why Guys pointed out that Mark Sanchez and Eli Manning had identical QB ratings after their first three seasons in the NFL. Then, Chris Matassino added that Giants backup David Carr was only a touch better than the pair.

Sanchez stunk for long stretches of this season, but Eli stunk for parts of his early career too and now looks like one of the best quarterbacks in the NFL. I think the most important thing to remember is that a quarterback’s performance — and stats, of course — is massively impacted by the play of his teammates and the schemes in which he plays.

It’s not entirely sensible to defend Sanchez for the way he played this year, but given the woefulness all around him on the offense, it’s also probably not fair to cite this season as evidence for why he’ll never be a successful NFL quarterback.