Twitter Q&A-fashioned product

Have I previously mentioned my feelings for Oreos here or is Gerald just making an educated guess?

Either way, Oreos are f#@$ing amazing. If someone offered me Oreos before a social gathering — let’s say a wedding, something where there’ll be lots of pictures — I’d first ask if they’re Double Stufs. And then regardless of the answer, I’d probably eat a ton of Oreos.

The only thing that might stop me would be if I knew for a fact there would be amazing food at the wedding and I could conjure up enough will-power to avoid ruining my dinner (or cocktail hour) with cookies. But even if that happened, I’d probably stash a few Oreos in my suit pocket just in case. Wedding cake often sucks, and if there aren’t going to be many other dessert options you’re going to want those Oreos for the ride home.

Of course it’s worth noting that I’m married now and no longer at all dedicated to convincing strangers to make out with me at or after social events. Still, any woman so superficial as to reject a man because of a little chocolate on his teeth doesn’t deserve to love me.

This is a good question, and if I could answer it definitively I’d be… well, smarter than I am currently. I’m never eager to diagnose mental issues in professional athletes that I do not know personally. And I’d remind anyone doing so that players will almost always look less confident and more crazy when they’re not performing. No one appears to have the much-sought closer mentality when he’s blowing leads.

The command issue is an easier one to tackle: Yes, he has a command issue. Parnell has walked 4.1 batters per nine innings for his career and 4.4 on the season. There are plenty of effective relievers who can work in that range, but most of them strike out even more batters than Parnell does — in this season and across his career.

And practically none of those guys allow hits at the rate Parnell does — steadily above 10 per nine innings for his entire career. As Patrick Flood has pointed out, it doesn’t seem to make sense for Parnell to allow so many hits on balls in play, since he generally yields a high rate of groundballs. Tough as it is to believe, it’s still too early in Parnell’s career to say for certain that it will keep up and it’s not an awful run of bad luck (compounded, of course, by the walks).

The most frustrating part about watching Parnell, for me, is the utter predictability of his pitch sequences. I have no good way of quantifying that relative to other pitchers, but I feel like I can almost always guess what’s coming. Part of that is obviously because he really only throws two pitches.

I wonder, though, if there’s something else to Parnell’s much-discussed habit of struggling every time he’s given a more important role. Could it be that by the time Parnell’s role is expanded, he has pitched so well and so often in the middle innings that he’s doomed to fail? He has pitched in 10 games in less than 14 days since Aug. 29, including six times in seven days from Aug. 29-Sept. 4.

Obviously I don’t know that’s the problem. Plus even if it is, a team needs to be able to count on its late-inning relievers to shoulder heavy workloads for certain stretches.

Meh

I spent most of this morning waiting on hold for health-insurance reps and now I’m bound for the ballpark. I’ll post something here in the afternoon, but for now enjoy this highlights montage from Season 2 of Wipeout that is for some reason set to a Ricky Martin song.

In love and WAR

Hippeaux at It’s About the Money investigates the problems with the super-stat WAR. A good read. I generally avoid using the metric, if not necessarily for the reasons Hippeaux lists then because I find it massively un-fun to rely on a single imperfect stat to compare baseball players. It’s good for quick-and-dirty evaluations, but I’d always rather see the components of a player’s WAR than his WAR itself.

Let he who doesn’t get liquored up and shove racks of ribs down his pants cast the first stone

If at first you don’t succeed … don’t try sticking a rack of ribs down your pants again, dude.

A Pennsylvania man with a history of public drunkenness was sloshed this weekend when he tried to smuggle the $20 slab of meat from a Giant supermarket for the second time in three months, police said.

Donald Noone, 65, of Carlisle, Pa., tried and failed at a similar rib robbery in the same store on May 22, police said. That rack was worth $13.34 – not that anybody was buying the recovered evidence.

Larry McShane, N.Y. Daily News.

This guy just keeps getting drunk and jamming ribs down his pants. You gotta buy ’em first, bro.

LOLMets OMG amirite

A pack of junkyard dogs is roaming the sidewalks surrounding Citi Field, menacing visitors as they exit the ballpark.

“They came at me like a locomotive,” Elaine Feerick said, describing her encounter this month with a 70-pound pit bull and a shepherd mix “that looked like a wolf.”

It’s too bad the nine on the field don’t play nearly as aggressively as the canines outside, the beleaguered Met fan said.

“My friend, who’s terrified of dogs, ran for her life faster than I’ve ever seen her run before,” Feerick said. “I stood there and the pit bull rammed into me like a battering ram — amazingly, I did not go down.”

Amber Sutherland and Jeremy Olshan, N.Y. Post.

This might be the New York Postiest article on record. It turns out “pack of junkyard dogs… menacing visitors” refers to one time one dog ran into one lady.

It’s all just a particularly silly salvo in the war between the people who like to make fun of the Mets and the people who like to make fun of those people.

Human memory is frail and suggestible

In its ruling, the court strongly endorsed decades of research demonstrating that traditional eyewitness identification procedures are flawed and can send innocent people to prison. By making it easier for defendants to challenge witness evidence in criminal cases, the court for the first time attached consequences for investigators who fail to take steps to reduce the subtle pressures and influences on witnesses that can result in mistaken identifications.

The idea that human memory is frail and suggestible has gradually gained acceptance among leaders in law enforcement, buttressed by more than 2,000 scientific studies demonstrating problems with witness accounts and the DNA exonerations of at least 190 people whose wrongful convictions involved mistaken identifications. About 75,000 witness identifications take place each year, and studies suggest that about a third are incorrect.

Erica Goode and John Schwartz, N.Y. Times.