Matt Kemp badass

I’m going to go 50-50 next year. I’m telling you, y’all created a monster. I’m about to get back in the weight room super tough so I can be as strong as I was last year. … Forty-forty is tough, so 50-50 will be even tougher, but anything can happen. I have to set my limits high so I can try to get to them as much as I can. I’m going to try for 50-50, which has never been done. I’m serious. If I don’t [get there], it means I let y’all down and lied to you, and I don’t like being a liar. I know y’all are over there thinking I’m crazy, but hey, I’m trying to take it to another level.

Matt Kemp.

Awesome. I’m not sure I’ve mentioned it in this space, but Kemp’s one of my favorite players in the league. I was pretty disappointed to hear about his contract extension because it dashed my dreams of the Mets’ signing him next offseason, even if I knew how unlikely that was to begin with. The absurd terms of the deal made it a little more palatable, but still. Man is Matt Kemp sweet.

Via Big League Stew.

Reconstituted Meat

I’ve been thinking more about Patrick Flood’s “Too Much Bacon” post from the other day — not the down-the-road stuff about paying for Web content so much as Flood’s very valid point that the glut of hot-stove information is overwhelming and very likely driven by the pursuit of page views.

And it led me to another food metaphor, or at least a food-related metaphor. Anyone remember this incredible sequence from Jamie Oliver’s Food Revolution?

Every part of it is amazing, obviously. Oliver thinks he’s going to shock these kids out of eating chicken nuggets, so he shows them the disgusting way in which some processed chicken nuggets are made. The kids appear duly grossed out until he puts the nuggets in front of them, when they all ultimately admit they’re hungry and want to eat the nuggets no matter how they were prepared.

So when considering the way I want to approach this blog during the hot-stove season, since it is nominally a sports blog affiliated with a sports network and since I do want to maintain some sort of sports-based bent on this site, I wonder: Who do I want to be, in this equation?

I don’t have the stomach to peddle nutritionally devoid nuggets to the hungry masses, no matter how tempting the profit line. And though I can understand the urge to scarf down those nuggets, I don’t really want to be the children either, chewing up and digesting everything in sight without considering the source.

But I also have no strong desire to be Jaime Oliver, tilting at windmills, preaching in vain to try to prevent people from catering to their most base instincts.

Most of my heroes are, well, trolls — those content to remain detached from the action and make fun of it. That probably reflects poorly on me, but it is what it is. Oliver’s show and this segment were introduced to me by Stephen Colbert, whose take on the nuggets bit was absolutely perfect.

All of that is a long-winded, sausage-factory (and excuse the mixed food metaphor) way of saying I probably shouldn’t ignore all the hot-stove stuff even if I think most of it is tiresome. And I think most consumers of offseason rumors would admit that they recognize how few of them come to pass and how little it all means, sort of like the way Oliver’s nugget-eating children guiltily smirk away their trans-fatty transgressions.

So I want to start indulging just a few of a the rumors a couple of times a week here: To examine their sources, their likelihood, and their potential benefits to the actors involved. Because hey, it’s baseball. It’s supposed to be fun. And we’re hungry.

I’ll probably settle into some sort of regular format eventually. Or I’ll get bored with the whole thing and scrap it entirely. Who knows? Check back often to find out!

Here we go:

Wait, but are the A’s also talking about it or are the Reds simply talking about it amongst themselves? And are we talking the Reds’ front-office decision-maker types here, or just like, members of the Reds, sitting around talking about how great it would be if they could make a deal for Andrew Bailey because they heard he makes awesome chili or is easy to fleece in poker or something?

Oh wait! The A’s are very willing to trade Bailey. Maybe the chili gives you disgusting gas. Actually the odds of Bailey being traded are about 100 percent, and he’s even more available than Gio Gonzalez — which makes sense because Gonzalez is younger, way better and under team control for longer, and maybe also, you know, seeing someone.

Anyway, it strikes me that maybe the A’s would be best served hanging on to Bailey, not just to troll reporters everywhere but also because there are a slew of free-agent closer options available this winter — many of whom are coming off injury or frequently injured. Let all those chips fall where they may, then when the chips get hurt, you’re holding the only chip. That’s just Moneyball, or something.

Oof, half dozen teams.

Jack Wilson can’t hit at all. I’ll confess I haven’t seen a ton of Wilson the last couple years and I don’t put too much stock in small-sample UZR data, but he’ll be 34 on Opening Day and he’d have to be among the best defensive middle infielders in baseball to be worth carrying his bat.

Seems hard to believe a half dozen teams would have more than a passing interest in the man, except maybe on a Minor League deal or in terms of like, “oh hey Jack Wilson’s still going? That’s interesting.” Of course it’s certainly possible, because more than a half dozen teams have done stranger things.

Red Sox sign Chorye Spoone: Wait, that’s a real guy? Dickens team? Dickens team.

Obligatory. Lyrics NSFW:

Mets sign Adam Loewen

The Mets have signed outfielder Adam Loewen to a Minor League deal. OH START PLANNING THE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP PARADE NOW I AM SO SMART AND FUNNY! I’M TOTALLY BUYING SEASON TIX CUZ THEY SIGNED ADAM LOEWEN GET IT GUYS LOL? MORE LIKE LOESEN!

Seriously though, this is a nice move.

Loewen came up through the Orioles’ system as a big-time pitching prospect before enduring elbow problems and related control issues and flaming out after 164 pretty bad Major League innings. He became a full-time position player in 2009, manning the outfield corners and first base.

That year, Loewen posted a .236/.340/.355 line in 391 plate appearances in High A ball. The next year, Loewen hit .246/.351/.412 in 537 PAs in Double-A. In 2011, he hit .306/.377/.508 in 585 PAs in Triple-A.

Notice anything?

The 2011 line happened in the Pacific Coast League in Las Vegas, which is about the best place in the world to hit. So that should be taken with about the Dead Sea’s worth of salt. But here’s a guy who had all of two professional plate appearances from 2003-2008 and managed to not embarrass himself in 2009, then improved in 2010 and 2011.

Hell, look at it this way:

Year BB% SO% ISO
2009 12.8 29.2 0.119
2010 12.3 26.4 0.166
2011 10.4 23.2 0.202

So he’s not walking more, but Loewen has struck out less and hit for more power as he has advanced. Some of that has to do with the park and the PCL, for sure. But because he’s so new to being a full-time professional position player, Loewen’s a good upside play for the Mets on a Minor League deal. I don’t know anything about Loewen’s defense and the Mets already have a couple of good lefty-hitting corner guys in Daniel Murphy and Lucas Duda. But hey, the more the merrier.

Excuse me?

We are not like the Basketball Wives; we are classy…. [The Mets] were scared of my big fun bags. They were afraid they were too big, and they were going to obstruct the view of the fans seeing the game. Plus they were intimidated by them themselves. So they had to trade him, I guess. I don’t know why you would trade a stud pitcher. I don’t know why it became about me. But it kind of makes me feel good that they were intimidated by me.

Anna Benson.

Wait a minute: Who’s the “stud pitcher” in question?

Nick Evans: Gone, and long since forgotten

Remember Nick Evans? Yeah, don’t worry: few do. Least of all Major League managers.

It’s a shame though, because Evans can hit at least a little bit. And he can play a bunch of positions, and he’s still relatively young. But he’s the victim of a numbers crunch in Flushing: The Mets have a bunch of prospects they need to protect in the upcoming Rule 5 draft that they must feel offer more long-term upside than Evans, so they outrighted Evans to Buffalo to clear space on the 40-man roster, and Evans elected free agency.

Evans will catch on somewhere, and I suspect within a couple of years he’ll find his way into a regular Major League gig for part of a season and rack up 15 homers or so, then Mets fans everywhere will flip out, like, “never should of traided Nick Evans!” Then Evans will serve as a useful cog off some team’s bench for a few years, and then, of course, fade away as we all ultimately do.

None of that now appears likely to happen with the Mets, which seems too bad to those of us who came to root for the young man every time he got passed over for obvious opportunities by various managers. But decent-hitting right-handed corner-bat types aren’t terribly difficult to replace, so losing Evans to free agency hardly cripples the Mets’ future.

Mostly Mets Podcast

New Mostly Mets Podcast. And lo! It is good. On iTunes here.

Rundown
0:00 Hello
1:00 Fishy Marlins Reyes Rumors
– With a brief Phillies digression
– The role of Shake Shack
15:00 Marlins Logos/Uniforms. Learning from the Sand Gnats
23:00 Call-in Question
– A forgotten prospect
33:30 Email
– New CBA
43:00 – More Sandy Sweater vests
47:00 – How working in baseball has changed us
54:00 – Helping Patrick pick a college basketball team

Hear you say stuff

I’ve been remiss in noting that the Mostly Mets Podcast (one of which should roll out at some point this afternoon) now has a call-in line. Except you don’t actually talk to us. You leave a message, then we play it on the show and respond. Sorry to screen your calls like that, it’s just, we’ve got this ex, and… well, it’s a long story.

Anyway, here’s what you do:

* Call us at 347-915-METS / (347-915-6387).
* Listen to Patrick reading* a welcome message.
* After the beep, say your name, where you’re from, and then ask your question for the show.
* Hang up.

Also, has anyone yet identified the guys with the bananas in the photo above? They must be on the Internet somewhere.

Lastly, I’m kind of busy today. Sorry about the general slowness.

*- Patrick, is this true? Did you write the message down and read it, or did you go from memory? Either way it sounds very professional. A lot like my dad’s office answering-machine message actually.