I loved bologna sandwiches when I was a kid. They were my go-to elementary school lunch: Bologna and cheese on white bread, dry. I don’t know when or why I grew out of it, but by the time I worked in the deli I found myself somewhere between suspicious and judgmental every time an adult came in and ordered a bologna sandwich.

Why do kids and adults have such starkly different tastes in food? Is there science on this? It seems like kids generally prefer simple, unsubtle food. I know taste buds supposedly change, but are kids’ taste buds not fully developed or something?

Wait, focus: I got a Barbecued Beef Bologna sandwich from Blue Smoke in Citi Field’s center-field concourse. It looked like this:

That’s a sesame-seed brioche bun with pickles, onions, barbecue sauce and a huge, huge hunk of bologna. You can’t tell from the picture but the meat has got to be almost an inch thick — unlike any bologna I’ve had before.

The sandwich tasted a lot better than I expected it would given my apprehension about the bologna. Barbecue sauce and pickles, you might know, make a great combination of sweetness and tanginess. I’m not normally a big fan of the onion but these were sliced so thin that they hardly affected the texture but still provided a nice bit of flavor.

That bologna, though. It wasn’t that it was awful — the flavor was hot-doggy and good and matched well with the rest of it. It’s just that the texture of a giant bologna steak… it’s weird. It’s almost too tender, like meat-nougat or something. I hoped the barbecuing might mean some crispiness to the outside but that wasn’t the case.

If bologna is your thing, by all means, check this sandwich out. It’s about as good as I can imagine a bologna sandwich being. But for my money, if I’m going to Blue Smoke I’d much rather have the pulled pork or fried chicken sandwiches.

Daniel Herrera throws a pitch not often seen in the professional ranks these days: The screwball. Before Thursday’s double-header, I asked him and his catchers about it. I included my questions below where necessary:

Herrera: I learned to throw it in college. When I was a freshman I had a pretty bad changeup, and I dropped my arm slot to get more movement on my fastball. I started fooling around with grips and different ways to throw it, so pretty much I was just kind of pronating my changeup more and more until the spin was on the side. And eventually the spin started getting on top, moving like a curveball.

It was just messing around with a lot of things, a lot of trial error with what would hurt my arm and what wouldn’t. It definitely puts a lot of torque on my arm, but thankfully my elbow has held out.

I started throwing it in games my sophomore year in college. Since then it’s been my bread and butter pitch. I don’t think I’d have much of a chance if I didn’t have it.

I use it more heavily to righties. For lefties, it kind of comes back to them. I still throw it to lefties quite a bit, but I favor it to right-handed hitters.

Me: I read that you throw it with the index finger off the ball.

Herrera: (Grabs a ball and demonstrates the grip. It looks like a circle change, but with the index finger bent behind the knuckle of the thumb and a big space between the middle and ring fingers. The middle finger runs along one seam, with the ring and pinky fingers gripping the opposite side of the ball.) Yeah, I use the horseshoe to really pull down the ball. These two fingers (the ring and pinky) are basically for comfort, and the thumb just holds it in the hand. But the index finger is definitely off the ball.

When I release it, it’ll be right around here (turns his hand over so the circle made by his thumb and pinky faces straight down). Same arm slot, just a different release.

I know that hitters can see it more than my other pitches because it goes up out of the hand. It’s the only pitch that goes up before it comes down. Everything else is straight and then starts moving, and the breaking ball kind of goes around like a Frisbee. The screwball, when I do throw it, goes up.

Me: Do you know of anyone else that throws the screwball?

Herrera: I’ve talked to an old pitching coach I had with the Reds, Tom Browning. He used to throw it back when he pitched, but I don’t know anyone else who throws it now.

Mike Nickeas: His first day was in Washington. He came in, and I hadn’t had a chance to talk to him about his stuff. I heard he had a screwball. It was pretty neat. I was pleasantly surprised — he’s really effective. He throws the big one that acts like a curveball from a righty, and he has one that he throws lower that kind of dies before it gets to the plate.

It moves a lot, and the speed change is really dramatic. A lot of guys get out on the front side, and it’s a great pitch for groundballs -– easy outs.

I’ve never seen one before. It’s something that was new to me, and I was kind of nervous in anticipation, waiting to see what it was going to do. And it was pretty good, I was impressed.

Me: Is it a tough pitch to catch?

Nickeas: The knuckleball’s tougher just because it’s unpredictable. Once I get a feel for Herrera, I know which was it’s going to go. The knuckleball’s still the worst thing you have to deal with as a catcher.

Josh Thole: It’s a good pitch. It’s different. It looks like a changeup more than anything, but it’s different when you know what’s coming. I don’t know what it would look like when I’m hitting.

It’s the first time I’ve ever seen one. I’ve seen it on TV and all that, but it’s different. It’s an effective pitch for him. It moves pretty much like a right-handed curveball, I guess is the best way to put it.

Ronny Paulino: I think the knuckleball is more difficult. It’s weird rotation, no question. It’s weird; I faced him but it looked totally different. It looks different when you face him and when you catch it. It’s hard to explain.

He’s not this good, of course. If Evans had enough at-bats to qualify, his park- and league-adjusted 146 OPS+ would be good for 11th best in the National League — an upper-echelon run producer. But of course if Evans had enough at-bats to qualify, he probably wouldn’t maintain this level of excellence. Exciting as it is, this is a tiny sample.

Still, what can we take from Evans’ awesome late-season surge? For one, if he keeps up anything close to this pace for the rest of the season it’s hard to imagine he’ll be able to move so free and easy through waivers moving forward. Plus, if he keeps this up for the rest of the season, it’s hard to imagine the Mets would want to demote him anyway.

For another, if he maintains something close to this level of production, the Mets have to add him to their growing list of good-looking young hitters whose bats merit regular plate appearances but who lack an obvious position to play. If Ike Davis is healthy and back as the team’s everyday first baseman in 2012, the Mets will have Daniel Murphy, Lucas Duda and possibly Evans vying for jobs at uncomfortable or unfamiliar spots.

This is a discussion for the offseason, really, when we have more time to think about it, a better sense of what players the Mets will pursue, and more evidence to show how Duda and Evans will hit in the Majors.

I know I keep coming back to this, but it’s hard to think about the Mets’ crop of decent young bats and not look at the not-decent and not-young bat they trot out to left field almost every day.

Jason Bay is likely to play better defense than all those guys, but if he keeps hitting the way he has been this year it’s easy to envision a scenario in which one or several of the homegrown guys can more than make up the difference on offense.

From Rob at Amazin’ Avenue:

So it turns out baseball players perform better when they’re not playing with a broken back. Hmm.

There may be something else happening here, too. Even before Wright played hurt, he was striking out a ton. He whiffed 17 times in 70 plate appearances in 2011 before April 19, when he collided with Carlos Lee. That’s a 27.1 percent clip, above even the 24-percent standard he set for himself in 2010. All told, he struck out once every four plate appearances until he went on the Disabled List on May 15.

Since his return, Wright has struck out in 15.6 percent of his plate appearances, a pace much more in keeping with the 16.4-percent rate he kept from 2004-2008.

Of course, it’s hard to draw meaningful conclusions from such small samples. But even looking at the full season, Wright’s K-rate has dropped from last year while his walk rate has improved. Wright’s 135 wRC+ leads all Major League third basemen with at least 300 plate appearances, and that is, obviously, including his rough first stretch of 2011.

Even if those struggles had nothing to do with Wright’s injury and the split Rob depicts above is pure randomness — which seems unlikely — Wright is still a really, really good player. If he made some meaningful adjustment in his time off and the difference in his two halves indicates a return to form, then Wright is again a superstar. He does appear to be standing closer to the plate, though it’s hard to imagine the explanation could be that simple.

It’s also worth noting that third basemen in 2011 have hit a whole lot worse relative to the league than they usually do. Players at the hot corner, normally an offensive position, have out-produced only shortstops this season (by OPS). Seattle Mariners third basemen have a .505 OPS in 2011.

Patrick Flood connects the dots between Louis C.K.’s Louie and Jason Bay’s brutal two-year stint with the Mets. I have found the former much more enjoyable.

A lot of your friends and family ask, “What else do you have to do?” And I always tell them the only thing I can do is go out there and hit the ball and hope somebody takes notice.

– Valentino Pascucci.

Yesterday the Mets announced that they selected the contract of 32-year-old first baseman Val Pascucci from Triple-A Buffalo. Pascucci will join the team in Florida later today.

Back in 2008, when Pascucci was mashing for the Mets’ Triple-A affiliate in New Orleans, I participated in an enthusiastic but ultimately fruitless Internet campaign to get the hulking slugger on the big-league team. That club, in the thick of a pennant race, filled the fringes of its roster with guys like Marlon Anderson, Robinson Cancel and Abraham Nunez and unironically gave 25 pinch-hitting opportunities to Argenis Reyes. Pascucci posted a .963 OPS in Triple-A but never got the call; at one point, manager Jerry Manuel admitted he had never heard of him.

The Mets, as you probably know, fell one game short of the playoffs that year. In the weepy final game of the season, they used Anderson, Cancel and Damion Easley to pinch hit.

In the three seasons since, Pascucci has continued crushing Triple-A pitching. In seven years at baseball’s second-highest level, Pascucci has 159 home runs and a .902 OPS. It is the stuff of Pat Misch’s worst nightmare.

Yet Pascucci can boast only 62 Major League at-bats, all of which came for the Montreal Expos in 2004. Meanwhile, five American League teams have received OPSes of .730 or less from their designated hitters in 2011. Seven did in 2010.

Few professions are as closely and objectively tracked as Major League Baseball, so it seems the sport should be a meritocracy. Guys who fail and continue to fail at the Major League level should get weeded out; guys who torch Triple-A pitching every single year should get more than 62 chances to show what they can do in big leagues.

Only it doesn’t always work that way. Players get labeled — “Major Leaguer” or “Quadruple-A slugger” or “closer” or “organizational guy” — and the labels stick. Guys wind up in systems that never have the right need at the right time.

Maybe if five more balls off his bat found holes in that 2004 stint, Pascucci would have had a long and productive career as a right-handed bench bat, an Olmedo Saenz type. Maybe if he played in the Padres’ system last year instead of the Mets’. Maybe if he played in the Mets’ system in 2009 instead of the Padres’. Maybe if he posted the exact same numbers but hit left-handed.

None of that happened though, so Val Pascucci stayed in the Minors, crushing homers, taking walks, striking out, doing right by the city of Buffalo.

And it seems either ruthlessly ironic or perfectly fitting that the Mets call up Pascucci now that they don’t really need him, when they have bench-bat types in spades, guys that are younger and faster and a bit more versatile on defense. Pascucci’s second turn in the Majors comes as a reward, a month’s worth of big-league salary and a handful of at-bats for years of dutiful Minor League mashing.

But he joins the Major League Mets regardless, and maybe with that handful of at-bats… who knows? Perhaps Pascucci shows enough in a short sample to convince some other club he’s worth more than a spot on a coach bus and a couple of asses in Triple-A seats. Doesn’t seem likely, but then with baseball being baseball, sometimes things play out in unpredictable and awesome ways.

Adam Rubin investigates for ESPN New York.

Sandy Alderson says:

It’s very difficult, unless you’re one of a couple of teams, to have three, four guys making $15 million-plus. I don’t care who you are — again, with the exception maybe of a couple of teams. So I would expect we’ll be looking actively in the free-agent market, but we’ve got to get it to a position where we can be active every year and not be hamstrung by existing contracts. Part of that is making good decisions in the first place. I mean, if you invest $15 million, you hope you’re going to get $15 million worth of performance. We haven’t always gotten that.

It’s an obvious cop-out to say, “we’ll have to wait and see,” but, well, we’ll have to wait and see, right? We’ll have to wait and see if the Mets pursue Reyes, how much Reyes winds up getting and from whom, and where the team’s 2012 payroll winds up.

Alderson mentioned “the $100-$110 million range,” but in a pretty abstract way. It’s reasonable to extrapolate from the comment that the payroll will drop to that range, but it’s not like he explicitly said the team has a hard cap at $110 million.

The bright side, I suppose, is that the Mets have a bunch of Major League contributors that aren’t even eligible for arbitration yet. In Ike Davis, Daniel Murphy, Josh Thole, Justin Turner, Ruben Tejada, Lucas Duda, Nick Evans, Jason Pridie, Jon Niese, Dillon Gee and Pedro Beato, the Mets should be able to adequately fill at least four positions, most of the bench and two starting rotation slots with guys making barely more than the league minimum.

But naturally we don’t know yet if that will provide them enough flexibility to bring back Reyes.