Via Amazin’ Avenue comes this 2008 Hardball Times piece about Daniel Ray Herrera’s screwball, a rarity in contemporary baseball. I just tried throwing it as described with a Wiffle ball in my office, and now my shoulder hurts.
Category Archives: Mets
Minor League Furious Five
MB1C
Randy at the Apple presents merchandise celebrating Miguel Batista’s 100th win. This is awesome:

Just this morning I parked my car behind one with a DJ3K bumper sticker. That’s a pretty big commitment to the Derek Jeter 3,000-hit campaign, but it’s no Melky Car-brera.
Make this happen
Position-player candidates to be called up: first baseman Valentino Pascucci and outfielder Mike Baxter. The 32-year-old Pascucci, named Triple-A Buffalo’s MVP, last appeared in the majors in 2004 with the Montreal Expos.
– Adam Rubin, ESPNNewYork.com.
Do the Mets stand to gain much by calling up Val Pascucci? Not really. He’s 32, defensively limited, and probably not a big part of the team’s future.
Should they? Hell yes they should. Make this happen.
Hear me say stuff
I joined the gang from KinersKorner.com on their podcast last night to discuss the Mets and embarrassing photos of Cole Hamels. Check it out.
Because for some reason I now keep track of this
As I’ve mentioned about a dozen times: Last year the Mets gave 1633 plate appearances to position players that finished with on-base percentages below .300, by far the most in their division.
So far this year: 88, by far the least in their division.
Last year’s Mets offense ranked 26th in the Majors with an 89 OPS+. This year’s Mets offense ranks 7th with a 103 mark. Last year’s team finished 25th in on-base percentage with a .314 rate. This year’s team is fourth, with .335.
New Mostly Mets Podcast
With Toby and Patrick, as usual. We taped this last night, so there’s no talk of the Einhorn stuff or the K-Rod return. But there’s still some talk about bacon:
It’s on iTunes here.
Breakdown:
1:00 David Wright’s defense
5:00 the Marlins are so Marliny.
8:30 Jason Bay, Center fielder
15:20 Blogger Bait
26:00 Email
30:00 Bagels and Bacon – (Our weekly Bacon digression)
32:00 Twitter Questions
– AFL Roster Assignments
– Pitching Prospects, avoiding Gen K’s Fate
52:00 First September Callups: Setting an MLB record (Josh!)
55:00 – Paying Jose Reyes
1:05:00 – Things that are awesome
Mets get two guys
The New York Mets today announced the team acquired lefthanded pitcher Daniel Herrera and righthanded pitcher Adrian Rosario from the Milwaukee Brewers to complete the trade that sent righthanded pitcher Francisco Rodriguez and cash considerations to the Brewers on July 12.
– Mets press release.
So who are these guys?
Herrera’s a short, 26-year-old left-hander with 93 innings’ worth of Major League experience. In those innings, he posted a 106 ERA+ with a high 1.537 WHIP, but proved effective against left-handed batters. He held lefties to a .218/.278/.306 line, meaning he’d make a pretty decent lefty specialist if nothing else. Major League righties crushed him, though.
In 42 2/3 innings in the Triple-A (and hitter friendly) Pacific Coast League this year, Herrera held lefties to a .173 batting average and a .196 on-base percentage.
Rosario, a 21-year-old righty in Single A, hasn’t had a ton of success in the low Minors. One interesting note, though: In every stop in which teams used Rosario exclusively out of the bullpen, his strikeout rate spiked. Of course, it’s a bunch of small samples and he’s still in Single A, so it’s hard to get too excited. Toby Hyde has more.
Patrick Flood had a great post about bullpen construction yesterday that you should probably check out and which, I believe, endorses acquisitions like these ones. Herrera appears to be a guy the Mets could use next year in place of Tim Byrdak without having to shell out Scott Schoeneweis money on the free-agent market. Plus he appears to have good hair.
Somewhere between meh and boo
As of right now, 56 percent of TedQuarters readers polled say “Meh” to the news that the Mets’ sale of part of the team to David Einhorn fell through. 43 percent say “Boo,” and 1 percent — possibly the troll lobby — say “Hurrah.” Of course, this site’s readership likely does not reflect an accurate cross-section of the Mets’ fanbase.
I suppose as an SNY employee I should feel more passionately about the news, but I voted for “Meh.”
By now, I’ve become so jaded to negative and/or confusing news about the team’s ownership situation that I find it difficult to muster up much emotion even upon the event of real, meaningful news. And based on what little I learned about the Wilpons’ legal and financial woes when they last came to the fore, I know better than to trust most media outlets to report on this stuff in any appropriately nuanced fashion.
But thinking about it more now, and seeing some of the fallout online, I probably should have voted “Boo.”
For one thing, Einhorn seems like a smart dude, the type I’d like having some say in the way my favorite baseball team is run. For another, the way I understood it when the team went up for partial sale in the first place, the Mets were looking for a partner to ensure they’d be able to continue operating like the huge-market team that they are. Whether they will without Einhorn remains to be seen, but fans now lack the confidence that would have come with a rich man unencumbered by lawsuits contributing cash to the club.
Mostly, though, I say “boo” because the news means more incessant, mostly uninformed discussion of broad business proceedings that fail to interest me.
I like baseball. Sorry if that sounds willfully ignorant, but it’s the case. I’d like to know that the baseball team I root for is operating optimally and unburdened by its owners’ murky financial situation, then fret over the players the team’s front office chooses to put on the field without worrying about the way the club’s liquidity affects those choices. And I know that it’s all part of the same big picture, and that all teams are in so many ways impacted by the realities of a rich-people world distinct from my own. I get that.
But when the– Hey, the Mets got two guys!
David Wright: True SABR?
Baseball in general is subject to luck. There are so many variables that go with putting up numbers. With batting average, a lot of it depends on who is hitting behind you, and where you hit the ball.
– David Wright.