I got nothing

I’m gonna be honest: I got nothing. A three-day weekend is fast approaching. I’ve got lots of excuses but none of them is particularly good, nor, I imagine, would you care much anyway. It’s a beautiful day and I need to film a video and find a sandwich, so I’m going to take a walk. Enjoy Rocket from the Crypt and if you get a chance, send me something awesome from the Internet. More in a bit:

Crash McCray revisited

He acquired a cool nickname – “Crash” – which has stuck to this day. To commemorate the 15th anniversary in 2006, he went back to Portland for a Rodney McCray Bobblehead Day, where 2,000 dolls with a swinging fence were given away. He threw out the first pitch. McCray sent one of the figures to Hale, who displays it in his den. The right-field wall was named “McCray Alley,” though the team no longer plays there and the ballpark is a soccer stadium.

McCray enjoys the attention and is tickled that the clip plays every day at the Hall of Fame. “Not too many guys get there, in whatever form,” he says.

Anthony McCarron, N.Y. Daily News.

Cool feature from McCarron and the Daily News catching up with former Met Rodney McCray on the 20th anniversary of his sprint through the Civic Stadium wall and into baseball blooper-reel history. Click through and read it; it’s got a reasonably happy ending — everyone involved is still healthy and working in baseball, and there’s even a meat-based donation to the United Negro College Fund.

If you’ve somehow forgotten the play, it’s this one:

Embarrassing photos of Tom Brady

A couple of people asked me if the amazing Tom Brady waterslide photo from yesterday might lead to an Embarrassing Things about Tom Brady sidebar on this site, since, as we know, he is the face of man-UGGs and worse yet, he almost had to sell insurance. And the good folks at Sports Pickle have even put together an embarrassing photos of Tom Brady photo gallery, which I found through SNY Why Guys today and why you should check out.

But there will be no Embarrassing Things about Tom Brady sidebar here because it would cheapen the Embarrassing Things about Cole Hamels. It’s all for you Cole:

The League of Extraordinary Medicine

Let’s pretend, for a minute, that a separate league exists. Let’s call it the Asterisk League or, better, the League of Extraordinary Medicine. Drugs are legal but regulated. Athletes get educated about the risks, long term and short, of everything they introduce into—or onto—their bodies. Fans know exactly who is taking what and tracking their performance accordingly. Labs and scientists are inexorably linked to athletes’ rise and fall. Chemist versus chemist doesn’t sound like it would make great television, but the field would quickly advance to the point were records were broken daily and feats of crazy strength became the norm. Chemist versus chemist would become superhuman versus superhuman. Broadcasts could include expert scientists in the booth describing the limits of the human body and how these chemical enhancements get around that, or don’t. The League of Extraordinary Medicine is more honest, its regulation more sensible, since outlawing drugs just does not work—we’ve got a forever War on Drugs to prove it. And our tests for drugs still aren’t very good.

Ryan Bradley, PopSci.com.

Some tasty food for thought from PopSci. Presumably the sportswriters would have to be chemically enhanced too, lest the sanctimony become unbearable.

Anyway, it all makes me think of this ol’ SNL bit:

Well this is good

People ask me “Is poker luck?” and “Is investing luck?”

The answer is, not at all. But sample sizes matter. On any given day a good investor or a good poker player can lose money. Any stock investment can turn out to be a loser no matter how large the edge appears. Same for a poker hand. One poker tournament isn’t very different from a coin-flipping contest and neither is six months of investment results.

On that basis luck plays a role. But over time — over thousands of hands against a variety of players and over hundreds of investments in a variety of market environments — skill wins out.

David Einhorn, Speech at the Value Investing Congress.

<3.

I for one welcome our new hedge-fund overlords.

Via Patrick Flood.

Everything coming up Milhouse

Francisco Rodriguez’s $17.5 million vesting option, activated for 2012 if the closer finishes 55 games this year, is commonly seen as an albatross, a major drag on his trade value. But for a variety of reasons, the clause is not as problematic as it seems, and Rodriguez might be far easier to move than conventional wisdom suggests.

The closer’s open-mindedness will help: Although Rodriguez has a clause blocking trades to 10 undisclosed teams, a source close to him said that he will consider any potential deal that is presented to him. Rodriguez is also open to waiving the vesting option in the event an acquiring team wants to negotiate a multi-year extension, the source said.

Andy Martino, N.Y. Daily News.

This ray of sunshine got lost in the Einhorn news this morning. And the language here means this might not really be news — he’ll consider waiving his no-trade clause, and he’s “open to waiving the vesting option in the event an acquiring team wants to negotiate a multi-year extension.”

So Rodriguez is open to being overpaid for the next several years instead of just being overpaid next year. That seems to make sense. I am also open to that.

Regardless, it’s good news that Rodriguez would waive his no-trade clause at all. And if — as the executive quoted in Martino’s story suggests — the Mets could get something of value in return for Rodriguez, they should look to deal their closer regardless of where they are in the standings come the trade deadline.

I bring this up a bunch, but as a reminder: The whole “buyer vs. seller” thing is silly. Those are labels. At the trade deadline and all other times, an MLB front office should work to improve its club by considering all possible deals.

If the Mets can find a way to get out from Rodriguez’s 2012 option and get something of real value in return, it shouldn’t matter if they’re within a few games of the Wild Card. Teams desperate for relief help tend to overpay for it at the deadline, and the Mets can find someone to close out games — perhaps not as effectively as Rodriguez, but you’re talking about 25-30 innings tops over the rest of the season.

Well-run teams can find ways to put together good bullpens on the cheap, allowing them to allocate payroll elsewhere. If the Mets can find a way to spin Rodriguez into a useful young player, they can replace him with a less expensive pitcher and reinvest his salary in a position more difficult to fill. Like, I don’t know, say, shortstop.