Mets sign D.J. Carrasco

Two things stand out on the positive side of the ledger for Carrasco. The first is his tendency to keep the ball on the ground and, by extension, in the ballpark. Merely decent strikeout and walk rates coupled with an above average home run rate can add up to a pretty solid reliever. Ground ball pitchers limit not only home runs in particular but also extra-base hits in general–grounders are less likely to find gaps than their airborne brethren. Too, more ground balls usually mean more double plays, so that’s another bonus.

The second point in Carrasco’s favor, albeit an ethereal one, is that he was pretty effective against lefties in 2010, which is exceedingly rare for right-handed pitchers. Unfortunately, Carrasco hasn’t historically been very good against left-handed hitters, and was awful against them in 2009 (.317/.392/.463). He did throw far more curveballs last season than ever before, but it’s not clear how that would have served him well against lefties.

Eric Simon, Amazin’ Avenue.

I was down on the idea of signing Carrasco just yesterday, but I figured he’d cost more than the two years and $2.5 million he reportedly received.

At that rate, he hardly seems like an awful signing (consider that it took over a million to lock down Kelvim Escobar for 2010). As Simon points out, he yields a decent amount of ground balls and is decently, if not spectacularly, effective.

I wouldn’t get too excited over his ability to retire lefties — across his career he hasn’t been great, and I suspect his success in 2010 might be a small-sample size hiccup.

Also, one thing Simon doesn’t point out: Carrasco has demonstrated the ability to throw a good number of innings in relief in the past two seasons, chalking up 89 frames in 2009 and 78 1/3 in 2010. The Mets haven’t had a reliever throw that many innings since Aaron Heilman totaled 86 in 2007, though I imagine that has as much to do with Jerry Manuel’s quick-trigger bullpen management as anything else.

Hmm

Look, I don’t have any understanding about what the payroll will be or can’t be going forward. Let’s say arguably we have $50 million or $60 million coming off next year. Do I think it would even be prudent to invest that full $50 million or $60 million again in a situation which binds us going forward so that we’re only in the market every three years when this lump sum comes off our books? No.

Sandy Alderson.

This is interesting, and something I hadn’t really considered.

If the Mets don’t throw all of the $50-60 million that comes off the books after this season back into the team’s payroll in the offseason, of course, fans will revolt. They’ll accuse small-market Sandy of being cheap, and argue that a big-market team should never cut payroll from season to season.

But if you think about it, what Alderson’s saying here is smart. Ideally, a team should always have financial flexibility in the offseason — enough to fill any pressing needs via free agency or take on big contracts via trade.

So, looking down the road, it would behoove the Mets to either maintain a little flexibility next offseason or to stagger contract lengths to ensure that a certain amount of is freed up after every season.

That way, whenever you hit the point when it seems like you really are just one player away from a certain playoff bid — a spot where overpaying for free agents is excusable — you know you will always have the requisite payroll to lock him down.

Water balloon stuff

As far as I understand it, the bulk of the knowledge you gain from going away to college is not from the classroom, but from interacting with new people from different places and various backgrounds. Not that you can’t gain the same knowledge elsewhere or otherwise or whatever, just that college sort of expedites the process and allows you to do it all in a reasonably safe place while getting drunk with some frequency.

Anyway, every student brings something to the exchange: unique perspectives, diverse interests — all that stuff they probably brag about in the student handbook, if there is such a thing.

I brought water balloons. That was my contribution to the Georgetown University campus community from the fall of 1999 to the spring of 2003.

At home on Long Island, my friends and I owned one of those water-balloon slingshots. It was amazing. Also, for some unclear reason, Rockville Centre is like the nightlife capital of Southern Long Island, providing a group of very bored young men with a bevy of unknowing potential targets for water-balloon fire.

Drunk people get so mad when they’re nailed with water balloons. And the hilarious thing about using the slingshot is that the victim never even considers that it might have come from like 100 yards away. A balloon shot from that distance always explodes on impact so it doesn’t really hurt as much as you’d expect. So the natural reaction is only to check your immediate surroundings for the perp. Little do you know he’s comfortably hidden across the parking lot, giggling his ass off.

Actually, thanks to Google Maps, I can show you. The A flag on this one is R.J. Daniels, one of the town’s bars — though it wasn’t called R.J. Daniels then. That red awning behind it is the outdoor-patio area of the bar, which got pretty crowded in the summers and extended out into that tiny patch beyond the awning. Ground Zero, essentially. We set up either on the train trestle (the red arrow on the left) or the parking lot behind the gym, past the elevated train tracks and across the street.

The distance, you will note, provided us ample time to run like hell in the rare instance a posse of angry drunk dudes would figure out that the balloons were launched remotely and come storming out of the bar thirsty for blood.

Once I felt comfortable enough in college to unleash my hobby upon the campus, my friends and I found a great spot. Check it out — the arrow in the map below points to a little-known but easily accessible perch above the main entrance to the campus’ student center. From it, you had a clear but well-covered shot at anyone coming out of the Henle dorms to the north or walking along the main campus paths, seen here in white.

Get a case of beer and a cooler full of water balloons and you’ve got yourself a pretty solid evening out. (Lord, we were losers.) One time we put a balloon between a guy playing guitar and the girl he was trying to impress. Another time, a well-placed shot in the middle of two passing groups prompted a minor scuffle. We knocked a drunk guy over once with a direct hit. That one we felt a little bad about, after we stopped giggling.

For safety reasons we tried to avoid cars. But once, from a different location, we hit a slow-moving black town car heading to a campus function, and then the angry driver when he got out and started yelling. We were told later that the passenger was a certain Senator Biden from Delaware.

Anyway, my sophomore year I caught a case of mono that forced most of my water balloon exploits indoors. Desperate times. I wound up in a pretty serious and ongoing water-balloon battle with my neighbors downstairs which meant I kept filled balloons on hand in our bathroom at most times.

One of those times, some loud and liquored-up students were standing outside in the courtyard, three floors below my bedroom window. Maybe I was jealous that they could still enjoy parties while I was stuck inside sick.

Anyway, I figured nothing all that bad could come of it, so I dropped a balloon quick and ducked inside. This is a close-range shot we’re talking about, much riskier than when we normally targeted strangers. The arrow on the left is the approximate location of my window, and the arrow on the right is about where these people were standing.

I didn’t imagine all that much that could go wrong if I just tossed one out the window into the group. My door was locked, plus most people who go to Georgetown are total weenies.

Only not the particular guy I hit. He was a 270-some pound lineman on the football team, and he and two of his football buddies lumbered upstairs and kicked open my door.

I took the R. Kelly approach: deny everything. The drenched dude asked me if I was throwing water balloons, I said no. He asked me why my window was open, I said it was for fresh air. Then one of his friends made his way into the bathroom and came out asking why I had all those water balloons in the bathroom if I wasn’t throwing water balloons. I said they weren’t mine.

They stared me down for a few anxious seconds, then one turned to the other two:

“OK, this guy’s cool.”

It gets better: Apparently all the commotion prompted someone in my stairwell to call the cops. Before they showed up, the drunk guys went back outside, all fired up and looking for trouble. They found it in the form of one member of the basketball team and two of his high-school friends from D.C.

I don’t know what prompted it, but from my window I watched as one of the D.C. locals stepped to the football guy, punched him in the face and knocked him to the ground. Then he took one step to his right, punched the next guy in the face and knocked him to the ground. Then he took another step and reared back to punch the third guy, only the third guy just sort of ducked out of the way and stumbled to the ground on his own.

When the cops arrived, they found three drunk, drenched, dazed meatheads practically waiting to be arrested.

The postscript is that some of my oldest friends from college were also on the football team, and I told them the whole story a couple days later. Turns out they also didn’t like the meathead in question, and used the story of his ignominious ass-kicking as fodder for harassment for the remainder of their time in college.

Robot-on-robot crime outside Coors Field

A robot met its end near Coors Field tonight when the Denver Police Department Bomb Squad detonated the “suspicious object,” bringing to an end the hours-long standoff between police and the approximately eight-inch tall figurine….

A bomb squad robot was sent it to examine the troublesome robot before a bomb squad officer, dressed in heavy protective gear, took a turn.

Murray said that the bomb squad couldn’t be sure if the robot was safe or not, and so remotely detonated it at about 5:30 p.m. to “render it safe.” The robot exploded into several chunks.

Kyle Glazier, Denver Post.

I love the idea of bombing stuff to “render it safe.” This robot will be safest EXPLODED!

Clearly another case of cops blowing stuff up because they can. And I endorse that behavior, because if I were a cop I’d blow stuff up all the time. Also, due to my enthusiasm for explosives, I probably wouldn’t last too long in my cop job. Police offers have so many opportunities to get away with tons of destruction. In most cases, I admire their restraint.

Here’s what the menace in question looked like:

And remember, if we keep citing potential terrorism as an excuse to unnecessarily blow up obviously harmless items, then the terrorists have lost big time.