Another skill in the stable

1. Soak chicken in buttermilk
2. Dredge chicken in flour
3. Fry chicken
4. Eat chicken

Actually it wasn’t quite that simple — I added some herbs and spices to the buttermilk and the flour dredge because Colonel Sanders is a hero of mine. Plus I heated the oil a little high the first time through, which is why the wing (on the back part of the plate) appears a little burnt.

It was all pretty delicious, though. Plus I’m proud to be among the chicken-fryers. Living the suburbs and owning a smoker and deep fryer has really widened my array of things-I-can-do.

Don’t trade “the core” part eight billion

Blow up the team and start over. Forget about the Core Four. The core is rotten. Reyes keeps breaking down. Beltran has arthritic knees. David Wright hasn’t been right since he was beaned in the head last year, and he hasn’t ever truly gotten comfortable at Citi Field or stepped up as a vocal leader in the clubhouse.

You ask, “What will the Mets do about a power hitter and a major league quality shortstop?” How far has it gotten them in the last four years? What has this group done? Come up short in the NLCS, gotten overtaken with a seven-game lead in the division with 17 games to play, fallen out of the money for four straight years. The only untouchable — and that would be the case anyway because of his salary — is Santana.

Blow it up.

Tim Smith, N.Y. Daily News.

OK, exhale. I’ve really been working hard — and succeeding, I think — to not make this site a Daily News watchdog blog. But upon receiving my third or fourth reader email from about this particular column this weekend, I figured I should tackle its thesis. Plus, this way I’ll have something in the bag to link to for the inevitable onslaught of “BLOW UP THE CORE” columns to come in the offseason.

Smith’s effort is more or less a compendium of the nonsense typically bandied about regarding the Mets, some of it accurate, some of less so. He writes that their front office seems to have no plan, which often appears true. He also blusters about players tossing Frisbees in the outfield before a game — precisely the type of thing that earns a winning team labels like “carefree” and “fun-loving,” and something plenty of teams do that seems like just as good a way to stretch out the legs as any.

Smith then asserts that the Mets cut Alex Cora for financial reasons rather than general scrubbiness, that Carlos Beltran and Luis Castillo ruined the clubhouse chemistry, and that — this is the best part — Francisco Rodriguez was reacting to the front office’s lack of strategy when he punched his girlfriend’s father in the face.

Finally he comes to the conclusion that it’s time to “forget about the Core Four.” This is fascinating for a number of reasons, not the least of which is the label “Core Four.” I thought that was a Yankee thing. Who knew? Apparently in the Mets’ case the Core Four I am to forget about refers to David Wright, Jose Reyes, Carlos Beltran and Johan Santana.

The particular suggestion is problematic because it reflects something akin to an underpants-gnome approach to sports analysis. David Wright and Jose Reyes are the best players on the Mets this year. The Mets will not win a World Series this year. Thus, the Mets will not win a World Series with David Wright and Jose Reyes as their best players.

That’s perhaps an oversimplification, but the fundamental lapse in logic is the same.

The problem has never been that the Mets are building around “rotten” players, but that they’ve done a rotten job building around good players. The Mets have gotten the second-worst production in the National League out of their first basemen in 2010, the worst out of their second basemen and the worst out of their right fielders.

And you’re telling me the problems are with the guys that can actually play? The young guys under reasonable contracts, no less?

I’ve put aside Beltran for the sake of this argument because his situation is entirely different from Reyes’ and Wright’s. He’s older and he’s playing poorly, and he’s got a bone-on-bone condition in his knee that isn’t going anywhere and an $18.5 million deal for next season.

We’ve still only seen a very small sample of Beltran this season, and who knows what time, strength and more rehab will bring. But the Mets almost certainly will try to trade Beltran, very likely in vain, even if he’s got that whole no-trade thing. Arguing to trade him, though, is a very different thing than arguing to “blow up the core.”

Ugh. I don’t even know why I’m bothering with this. There’s really nothing more pointless than impassioned missives to trade players for the sake of trading them with no set target in mind. It’s the worst type of radio gaga, the type of nonsense I shouldn’t even indulge. Look: Trade Reyes for Felix Hernandez? Yeah, sign me up. That one probably isn’t on the table, though.

Here’s the thing: It’s really, really hard to win the World Series. It’s hard to make the playoffs even. I’m not saying the Mets do a good job of it, or even do a good job of working towards it.

But a great step in that direction — the best step, even — is having excellent players in their primes. That’s really the whole idea. Trading excellent players in their primes only because you’ve been thus far unable to capitalize on the primes of those excellent players is not a good way to run a baseball team. Decidedly not.

David Wright and Jose Reyes are excellent players in their primes. Trading them for other excellent players in their primes in the right deal might be reasonable.

Trading them for the sake of trading them would be stupid.

Sandwich of the Week: Dar-ryl!

Allow a lengthy prologue:

Thursday, I mentioned that my first-ever baseball game was Opening Day at Shea in 1987. My parents are awesome for a variety of reasons, but none moreso than their ability to recognize that the Mets’ home opener should take precedence over school. It became an annual elementary-school tradition: I would go for an hour or two in the morning, then the principal’s secretary would come over the intercom and call me down to the office, where someone would be waiting to escort me out. Peace, suckers.

I don’t know what happened to me in the winter before the 1987 season started, why I suddenly became crazed for the sport. I imagine it had something to do with the lingering effects of the Mets’ championship on my environs. Before that year, I knew baseball as something my grandfather watched in his basement in a haze of cigar smoke and my brother yelled about from his room in our attic. I understood that the Mets won the World Series when they did, but that meant little to me at the time.

But by the time April rolled around I was obsessed with baseball the way six-year-old kids become obsessed with things, and I guess in the way I still haven’t entirely grown out of. I loved the Mets, I studied their baseball cards, I memorized their lineup, their pitching rotation, everything. My brother would show me off to his friends — look at my little brother, he’s six and he knows all the Mets’ batting averages, it’s hilarious.

So my first Mets game was a pretty big event. I made a banner and everything. It said “Let’s Go Mets!” in blue and orange watercolor, and we hung it up on the metal grate behind the our seats in the back row of Shea’s Loge Section, in the ol’ “Limited View” seating.

My uncle, my brother, my grandfather and I watched Darryl Strawberry homer in the first inning (well, we watched him hit a ball hard and trot around the bases. We couldn’t actually see the ball’s flight). Bob Ojeda cruised through seven innings, Jesse Orosco worked a six-out save, and the world-champion Mets began 1987 like world champions.

I left the park that day assuming Darryl Strawberry hit a home run every game and the Mets always won. It was awesome. The 23 years since have offered few thrills to match.

That’s all a long-winded and nostalgic way of saying that when I write excitedly about meeting Darryl Strawberry and having him comp my sandwich, please, please don’t take it as bragging. It’s not that. It’s celebrating.

F@#$in Darryl Strawberry, man! Why am I even bothering with this? I doubt very much that I have to explain to you, most likely a Mets fan and very possibly one who also grew up in the 80s, how amazing it is to meet Darryl Strawberry. That’s Darryl Strawberry, the best Met from our youth. The man who displaced Homer Simpson. Dar-ryl.

The sandwich: Smoked brisket sandwich from Strawberry’s Sports Grill, Douglaston, Queens.

The construction: Fresh-baked hero roll with smoked brisket, fresh jalapenos, fried onion strips, cheese sauce, and au jus for dipping.

“But Ted,” you’re saying, “you don’t like onions!” And it’s true. But everyone knows those fried onion strips they put on sandwiches have nothing to do with onions. Those are just fried fry-stuff with some tiny suggestion of onion buried inside somewhere. They add crispy deliciousness to the sandwich.

Important background information: We were at Strawberry’s to film two episodes of The Baseball Show that will air this week. Our video guys, lamely, did not want to do any episodes focused on the food, no matter how hard I campaigned. Darryl came and met us there, which was, like I said above, totally thrilling. He was also friendly and hospitable. After he showed us around and filmed with us, he told us our lunch was on him. So Darryl Strawberry bought me this sandwich.

Darryl seemed eager for us to spread the word about Strawberry’s, and when Darryl Strawberry asks you to do something, you do it. So here goes: It’s about a 10-minute drive from Citi Field and only a few stops away on the LIRR. It’s a nice, new place with a ton of memorabilia and dozens of HDTVs. Plus it’s owned by Darryl Strawberry. And the food, well, the food I’ll get to.

What it looks like:


How it tastes: Amazing. Straight-up: I probably would have said this sandwich was really good even if it weren’t because Darryl Strawberry asked me to spread the word and all, but luckily I don’t have to compromise my integrity because this is a spectacular sandwich. I mean, look at that thing. It’s also tremendous.

The brisket was moist and tender. The cheese sauce was creamy and, well, it was cheese sauce — think velveeta if velveeta wasn’t so artificial seeming. Like that texture, but clearly real food. The jalapenos got buried a little bit by all the other stuff, but they were there for the kick when you went looking for it, and the fried onions added all-important fried flavor and crunch.

I poured on some of the au jus for moisture, and also dipped the sandwich in Strawberry’s barbecue sauce, which is on every table. Restaurants definitely earn bonus points for that. Barbecue sauce on the table is a good thing, especially if the restaurant is not explicitly a barbecue joint — though it is apparently a specialty at Strawberry’s.

What it’s worth: This sandwich was free, baby. I believe it actually cost $14 or thereabouts, but the entire cost to me was my share of the tip, because Darryl Strawberry bought our sandwiches. Sorry, I know I’ve said that like three times already but I just like writing it.

This is probably worth the trip to Douglaston if you’re taking the LIRR into Citi or driving in from the North Shore of Long Island. Obviously there aren’t a ton of places to get good food and drink before Mets games immediately around the stadium. Heck, it’s real close to the Throgs Neck Bridge if you’re coming in from Connecticut or the Bronx, too.

How it rates: 88 out of 100. Shy of the Hall of Fame, but an excellent sandwich and one of the greatest to ever come through Queens. Like the Straw Man himself.

Sick day

I’m wiped out today for a variety of reasons, nothing terribly serious, and took a sick day. I’ll probably end up writing something a bit later when I get bored of watching The Price is Right. Plus I’ve got a couple of image posts scheduled courtesy of reader Glenn featuring some recent ex-Mets and Hollywood lookalikes, both great calls that I hadn’t noticed before.