Being Alex Rodriguez

You play baseball on Sunday afternoon. You play for the best baseball team, the one that’s the best now and the one that is always the best. All of your teammates get paid a lot, but you are paid the most. You hit your 598th home run in the game and your team wins.

That night, you take a limousine to the ace pitcher’s birthday party at a famous rapper’s nightclub. Your teammates are there. So is the famous rapper and his famous singer wife.

A beautiful blonde moviestar is there to see you, but you don’t speak to her. She is famous, too. You make eye contact across the room. You mouth to her the lyrics to the songs played by the famous DJ.

Before midnight, you make arrangements to leave. You sneak out the back door of the club and the blonde moviestar is waiting in the limousine.

It takes you to the heliport. You grab the blonde and board the helicopter and take off into the night, to some secret getaway for millionaires who date millionaires, someplace accessible by helicopter.

Tuesday, you play baseball again.

Help me help you

Make no mistake: I’m all about servicing the people. So I’m hoping you’ll help me better understand what you’re looking for when you come to this site and why you came here in the first place.

I put together a quick survey about this site. It’s totally anonymous and it’ll take you less than five minutes. I’d especially appreciate it if you write something in the suggestion box at the end. Click here to take survey

Robble robble, Tim McCarver

McCarver takes the game seriously, especially when it comes to management dealings with players and managers, especially Torre, his roommate when they played for the Cardinals. But using murderous dictators to make a baseball point, a point about a darn game, was the portrait of a man making an unconscious decision in a conscious state of mind.

Major League Baseball had McCarver’s spiel pulled from YouTube. They said it was about some copyright thing. Yeah, right.

Bob Raissman, N.Y. Daily News.

OK, first of all, Major League Baseball pulls every baseball clip it finds from YouTube. That’s no secret. The league’s business model, for better or worse, includes maintaining exclusive rights to all baseball video on the Internet. These sites — SNY.tv’s network — have access to the video only because of a partnership with MLB.com. Technically MLB has the rights to all video taken in a Major League ballpark. Anything that makes any noise on YouTube comes down pretty quickly.

There’s no way Raissman doesn’t know that. I mean, I certainly hope not — he’s the sports media critic for a major newspaper in a huge market. Seems like he’s employing a bit of duplicity to get in a jab at MLB and Fox.

And you know who else distributed misleading information to communicate their platform? That’s right, the Nazis.

Settle down; I’m kidding. And I’m certainly not here to defend Tim McCarver for anything, ever. There are some places people with huge audiences simply should not go, and even mentioning Hitler, Stalin, the Nazis, hell, anything involving genocide — that’s one of them. No doubt. People are pretty sensitive about that stuff, and rightfully so.

But the backlash against McCarver is kind of amazing. I mean, look, the guy went all Godwin’s Law and said something he shouldn’t have. But it’s not like he said, “The Yankees systematically murdered millions of people.” He was arguing — perhaps incorrectly — that the Yankees were ominously ignoring a part of their history, and he pointed out, accurately, that terrible people from yesteryear did something similar.

I guess the thing is, I don’t understand why everyone’s so surprised that Tim McCarver said something stupid. The comparison doesn’t even crack the top 10 things Tim McCarver has said that most offended me. It’s just that this instance happened to be an affront to decency and not to logic, his usual stamping grounds.

Does Mike Pelfrey suck now?

No. Pelfrey wasn’t as good as he pitched earlier this season and he certainly isn’t as bad as he pitched last night. The Diamondbacks smacked him around, no doubt, but he didn’t get much help from his defense either. Keep in mind that’s always an issue with Pelfrey, who generally pitches to contact.

Pelfrey is the “head case” du jour on the Mets’ roster, so everyone will extrapolate and psychoanalyze and everything else. And yeah, pitching is both a physical and mental pursuit, and for all I know Pelfrey’s struggling with the latter half right now. But the hiccup, whatever it may be, more likely requires a mere adjustment and not any sort of massive overhaul. It’s hardly like he’s throwing every pitch to the backstop.

Pelfrey’s struggles have been examined in detail by Eno Sarris at Amazin’ Avenue and Joe Janish at Mets Today. No one’s crying doomsday. These things happen. Pelfrey has been bad, but will be good again.

The tone on the Internet and in the papers has turned to desperation and outright vitriol because the Mets have lost seven of their last nine. Deep breaths. Teams struggle. If you believed the Mets were good enough to contend last week, a few losses shouldn’t change anything.

Of course, there are roster moves all over the place the team could undertake to improve its chances of winning, and those are important.

Unless Rod Barajas proves he can hit anytime soon, Josh Thole should probably be catching until he proves he can’t.

Raul Valdes appears to be a better pitcher than Fernando Nieve and perhaps steathily one of the better pitchers in the Mets bullpen. Nieve, not Valdes, should be dispatched if the Mets can’t bring themselves to cut bait on Ollie Perez, which they inevitably won’t. Yes, it will leave them with three lefties in their bullpen, but Valdes has been better against righty hitters in his small sample.

But the whole Perez thing is a different issue for a different post, and a bridge we’ll cross when we come to it.

For the first time in over a year, the Mets have Carlos Beltran, Jose Reyes and David Wright in the same lineup. Jason Bay will eventually hit. Angel Pagan is still really good. Luis Castillo can at least get on base. Ike Davis will smash some more homers.

There’s just no way the Mets are as bad as they’ve looked for the past week. Starting pitching may prove to be the problem everyone thought it would be before the season started, but the offense should soon pick up some of the slack. The team might benefit by adding an arm, but again, that’s another blog post for a time when heads are a bit cooler.

The Last Sandwich

One time one of my friends was planning to leave the country for a couple of years, so he threw a party and called it “The Last Party.” The rest of us tweaked him about it a lot, talking about how there would be no more parties after this party and as soon as he left the country all partying would cease.

Point is, I’ll eat many more sandwiches in the future and probably write about a bunch of them here. But this is the last sandwich of Sandwich Week, so I figured it needed a heavy headline like that.

The sandwich: Peanut butter and jelly, from the analog TedQuarters kitchen.

The construction: Pepperidge Farm whole grain bread with Skippy Creamy peanut butter on both sides and Smuckers raspberry preserves.

After construction, the sandwich is cut diagonally, which is very, very important. Really can’t stress that enough. I don’t even know why it makes peanut butter and jelly sandwiches exponentially better to cut them diagonally, but it definitely does. I think it has something to do with the angles. A diagonal cut gives you a nice corner to bite into to start the sandwich.

Important background information: Sandwich Week took me around the world, via sandwich. I ate sandwiches inspired by Asian, European, Caribbean, South American and Middle Eastern cuisine, plus some plain old-fashioned New York deli sandwiches. They say this nation is a melting pot, a broth stewed from the contributions of myriad cultures. But I say soup is lame, and we live in a giant, sliced-open hero roll just waiting to be layered with the meats of a thousand nations.

I finished Sandwich Week with a peanut butter and jelly I made at home, an intentionally symbolic choice. I will likely often make meals of PB&J’s in the coming weeks as I work to cut the weight I gained during Sandwich Week. Plus, though I realize it’s probably not what the Fourth Earl of Sandwich enjoyed on that fateful day, I feel like peanut butter and jelly is almost the O.G. sandwich. For a variety of reasons, a fitting finale to a wonderful week.

What it looks like:

How it tastes: It’s peanut butter and jelly, dammit. It’s delicious.

Whole wheat bread is not my favorite, I’ll be honest, but it’s a concession I make to health. I ate a lot of fried food last week, fellas, and I can use a little fiber in the diet. If I were making my ideal peanut butter and jelly, I’d probably use potato bread. Soft, delicious potato bread, oddly yellow even though potatoes aren’t.

Skippy peanut butter is clearly the way to go. I know it’s not the healthiest of peanut butters or the most gourmet. But I’ve had the fancy peanut butters where the oil separates on top and all that nonsense and they’re just not my thing. So inconvenient. You want me to stir my peanut butter before I spread it on my bread (and then lick the knife)? That’s a whole extra step. I’m a busy man.

It’s Skippy, baby. That’s the good stuff. I’m cool with creamy or crunchy or honey-roasted or whatever, I’m just loyal to the brand.

As for the jelly, the Smuckers Red Raspberry Preserves is where it’s at. I’ve never been entirely clear on what distinguishes jam from jelly and jelly from preserves, but I know what I like, and this is it. I think jelly tends to have big lumps of goo in there, and that’s not what I want. I want something I can spread evenly over the peanut butter on the bread to create sandwich uniformity. If there are big blobs of grape jelly in there — delicious though they may be — I’m going to inevitably get some bites that are mostly jelly, and I don’t want that.

Also, it’s of the utmost important that peanut butter be spread on both sides of the bread. If you’re reading this blog I kind of assume you’re smart enough to know that. A) Bread doesn’t get soggy with jelly B) More peanut butter.

What it’s worth: Way more than what it costs, which is so, so little. A jar of peanut butter costs what, like $5, tops? And you get like 20 sandwiches out of that. And the preserves are like $4, and once you buy them you pretty much have that jar until you move. It’s like magic, unless you make jam bars or something. So a peanut butter and jelly sandwich costs like a dollar maybe. And the 30 seconds it takes to make it. That’s amazing. It’s hard to find a better ratio of cost:flavor.

The rating: 80 out of 100. Peanut butter and jelly isn’t going to win any awards, and it’s certainly never going to be adequately appreciated. But it just keeps doing its thing, year and year out, performing at a very high level despite a limited set of tools. Maybe some day peanut butter and jelly will have its day in the sun, where it comes into vogue and everyone realizes how cool peanut butter and jelly is, but until then it will just remain a quasi-novelty act among sandwiches: simple, straightforward, heroic. Adam Dunn?

Johan Santana waging war on sabermetrics

Johan Santana doesn’t strike out hitters like he used to. Walks more of ’em, too. Judging by his peripherals, Santana is on a steep career decline, cruising toward a collapse into mediocrity. His FIP is a pedestrian 3.54, and is hugely benefited from an unsustainably low HR/FB rate. His xFIP is a weighty 4.65, Kevin Slowey category. He’s losing it, no doubt, or he has already lost it.

Just one issue, really: He’s still getting results. Santana boasts a 2.87 ERA, 10th in the National League. And he’s third in the league in innings pitched. When you only look at what Santana has done in 2010, without trying to use the numbers to extrapolate how he will do moving forward, Santana appears to be one of the best pitchers in the league. Still.

So what’s happening? Well, there are a few places to check when looking for indicators of good luck. Santana’s batting average on balls in play — .275 — is a bit lower than his career .286 rate, but not enough to account for his maintained success despite the drop in peripherals. His strand rate is right around where it has been his whole career, so no dice there either.

The big red flag is Santana’s HR/FB rate which, at 4.3%, is half of where it was last season and well below his career 9% mark. A big reason Santana’s xFIP is so high is because the stat normalizes HR/FB rate. It assumes Santana will allow homers at a rate aligned with the league average, and that pitchers don’t have a whole hell of a lot of control over the distance of the flies they induce.

But I wonder if there’s a relationship between Santana’s decreased strikeout rate and decreased HR/FB rate. Granted, if he’s inducing more weak contact, it’s not showing up in his percentage of line-drives or infield flies, both have which have held more or less steady with his career norms.

Still, Santana’s contact rate jumped from 73.2% in 2007 to 77% in 2008, his first with the Mets. And it has steadily climbed from there.

Is it conceivable that Santana consciously began inducing more contact upon switching to a more pitcher-friendly park, and to a league where a growing pitch count is more likely to get him yanked for a pinch hitter? Is it possible that Santana, with elbow issues affecting the velocity of his fastball, decided to begin approaching hitters differently as he realized he couldn’t blow pitches by them anymore?

I don’t know. I tend to have a lot of faith in the numbers, but I also have a lot of faith in Santana. And while I realize I’m biased in all sorts of ways — first and foremost as a Mets fan — I’m open to the possibility that something besides luck is guiding Santana’s excellence in 2010.

Simply put: I will believe Johan Santana sucks when I see him suck. Until then, I would rather try to figure out why he’s succeeding than dismiss him as fortunate.