Weekend update

I’ve been in DC for some Georgetown basketball (a thrilling victory over imposing American University) and so out of the loop a little bit this weekend.

But one vague rumor that seems to be blowing up my Twitter involves a three-way deal between the Mets, Cubs, and Rays, with Luis Castillo going to Chicago, Milton Bradley going to the Rays, and Pat Burrell coming to the Mets.

All three teams would be parting ways with a bad contract, though it’s tough to say exactly how the salaries would play out as there could also be money involved.

That said, Castillo and Bradley are signed through 2011. Burrell is owed $9 million for 2010.

I assume, if there’s any actual truth to the rumor, the Mets would use Burrell as a part-time player. Inserting a bad defender coming off a terrible offensive season in the everyday lineup would be a P.R. nightmare for an administration reportedly on thin ice; more likely, Burrell becomes a right-handed platoon partner for Daniel Murphy at first base, plus (likely ineffective) leverage to try to drive prices down on free-agent outfielders.

Burrell was awful last year to the tune of a .221/.315/.367 line, but, just looking at his baseball-reference page, he appears a likely bounceback candidate: He’s 33, and he was a consistently excellent hitter from 2005-2008. He also has a .916 lifetime OPS against left-handers, meaning if he could handle first base defensively, he’d be a good for a platoon there.

Whether Burrell and his $9 million over one year are worth Castillo and his $12 million over two years, I can’t say. Castillo, as a second baseman, was a much, much more valuable player than Burrell last season, even with his own defensive inadequacies.

That’s no safe bet to continue, of course, and if the Mets are so desperate to move Castillo’s contract, they probably won’t find a deal appreciably better than this one. It turns out it’s a bear market for 34-year-old second basemen with diminishing range, bad knees, no power and multi-year contracts.

Of course, by most accounts the Mets are so desperate to move Castillo’s multi-year contract so they can give another one to Orlando Hudson, a 32-year-old second basemen with diminishing range, so, you know, there’s that.

4 thoughts on “Weekend update

  1. Hey Ted, it’s Corey, Josh’s friend.

    As a Yankee fan, I’m on the outside, looking in on a trade rumor like this. Why would the Mets do this deal? To save 3 million you’d trade a decent stick at 2B, albeit with mental lapses, for a guy who appeared to be done last year? Burrell looked atrocious in the AL east all year, I seent it. You guys shouldn’t want him.

    • Hey Corey — good to have one of the very few loyal Protocol fans find the blog. It sounds as if the Mets are so into Orlando Hudson that they want to move Castillo to make room for him. There’s a lot wrong with that, of course. As for Burrell, he was terrible last year, but Castillo himself appeared to be done after 2008 and bounced back. Burrell was a good enough hitter with the Phillies that he’s probably earned the benefit of the doubt.

  2. I wouldn’t mind having Burrell in a contract year. I agree that he seems a solid rebound candidate.

    That doesn’t mean I agree with the organization’s apparent plan to go give out an equally bad contract to Hudson, of course.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s