Mets draft some guy

Somehow I never realized how much of a crapshoot the actual game of craps is until this weekend, when I stood near a table in Atlantic City and learned the rules of craps. It’s really just betting on dice rolls. Total crapshoot. It’s not just a clever name.

So it’s not really fair to call the MLB draft a crapshoot, because it’s not like the Mets could choose just anyone with that seventh overall pick and expect equal odds of a reasonable return. Matt Harvey has a much better chance of turning into a legitimate Major Leaguer than I do because I don’t throw a fastball in the high 90s. So it’s a good thing the Mets didn’t draft me.

But since baseball players are drafted from all sorts of different levels and leagues, there’s no easy way to compare skill levels and obviously no perfect way to project how good a player will become. So yeah, once scouts have poured over thousands of amateur players and identified the ones worth drafting in the first couple of rounds, it does a bit random as to which ones pan out.

Teams and general managers who draft players that become good Major Leaguers are generally credited as good drafters, and there are very likely some scouts with a better sense of projectable Major League talent than others. But such a slim percentage of drafted players become Major Leaguers and even fewer become Major League stars, so it’s damn near impossible to say for certain that any team consistently drafts well. We can point to teams with good draft histories and we can identify the teams that seem to employ the best strategies. That’s really it, though.

For a point of reference, check out the first basemen drafted in the first round in 2008. The Mets selected Ike Davis that year, a pick some fans (predictably) grumbled about but one that seems to be working out.

Davis was one of six first basemen taken in the first round. The first, Eric Hosmer, was out of high school and appears pretty talented, though he’s still a ways off. The second, much-hyped University of Miami product Yonder Alonso, has a .715 OPS across Double- and Triple-A this season.

The third, University of South Carolina’s Justin Smoak, raked in Triple-A earlier this season and is currently starting at first for the Rangers, though without as much success as Davis to date. David Cooper, drafted one pick before Davis out of Cal, has a .675 OPS in Double-A.

Four picks after Davis, the Padres took Allan Dykstra, who is sporting a .698 OPS in High A.

In other words, they’re all over the map. As of now, Hosmer, Smoak and Davis appear to have been good picks and Alonso, Cooper and Dykstra bad ones. So we can credit the Royals, Rangers and Mets for their talent scouting, or we can guess they just got lucky. And really, we still don’t know: All these guys are still young; any of the former three could collapse and any of the latter three could explode.

That’s a long and silly way of saying it’s sort of pointless to get too excited one way or the other about Matt Harvey. I understand that drafting college pitchers is a good strategy, though I don’t know that I’d point to Harvey’s history of 150+ pitch outings as a good sign (as many have). You can’t teach a 98-mph fastball, though, so that’s good.

What I know for certain is that he had an awesome mustache, so, you know, suck on that Chris Sale. Also, I will hold out some slim hope that he breaks with tradition and chooses Weird Al Yankovic’s deep track “Harvey the Wonder Hamster” as his warmup music. And it’d be cool if he’s good, too.

6 thoughts on “Mets draft some guy

  1. All you can ask for in the draft is good process, I think.

    Don’t settle for slot. Don’t draft for need. And whatever you do, don’t, for the love of God, draft college relievers with a ceiling of an MLB middle reliever.

    Sadly, the Mets have done all of those things (sometimes all at once) too often the past few years.

    This year, can’t really have any problem with what they did.

    • Agree 100% here. Fans on blogs and message boards are not trained scouts, so I find it funny when people who are basically clueless start judging the talent of guys they have never even seen play.

      Like you said, you just look for the good process, basically taking the best players they feel are available and spending the proper resources, which it appears they have done with thie first round pick.

      For me that all I can ask for, since how amd I supposed to know if Chris Sale or some HS catcher (who I’ve also never seen play) are better than Matt Harvey. Me saying that would just be stupid.

  2. Mets seem to be trying to recreate their successful pick of Pelfrey with this pick, which seems like an ok idea. But, I feel like pitchers are a lot more hit or miss than position players, due to the injury risk. After last year’s top pick Matz got hurt already, I was hoping they’d go position player this time around. I don’t like the trend that his K rate has gone down every year at UNC. But, who knows, maybe Harvey will be awesome. Lets hope he actually pitches somewhere this season, unlike Matz.

    • I believe his walk rate went down at the same time, though, so it could be he’s throwing more pitches over the plate and inducing more weak contact. I’m not terribly familiar with the college game, but I’m willing to bet there are plenty of guys who whiff at mid-90s heat if its even remotely in the vicinity of the strike zone.

    • Your just looking at a quick stat line and making what is really an uninformed opinion when you say that. Yes Pelfreys stats wer ere better than Harvey’s in college but you are completely ignoring that fact that they played against much different competition.

      Pelfrey went to Wichita State, in the Missouri Valley conference, Harvey to UNC,in the ACC. While Wichita State is a big time program itself, thier conference is no where near what the ACC is. Pelf was facing teams like Missouri State, Southern Illinois, and Norther Iowa, while Harvey was facing teams like Miami, FSU, Virginia, Clemson, G.Tech etc. The ACC had 5 or 6 of the top 25 teams in baseball this year. When Pelf was a senior at WSU, I dont think there were any MVC teams in the top 25 that year per baseball america.

      The level of hitters they were facing was not even close.

Leave a reply to Ryan Cancel reply