Wait ’til you see PECOTA

Alex Remington, continuing his stats-based series of columns for Yahoo!’s Big League Stew, asks, “How many more wins will a healthy Reyes and Beltran bring the Mets?

It’s a good writeup, but Remington is only trying to piece together two pieces of the giant puzzle that is attempting to project how the Mets will fare in 2010. Big pieces, mind you: The Mets’ success is certainly all wrapped up in the health of Carlos Beltran and Jose Reyes.

But Remington neglects to include how many more wins they’ll gain from a fully healthy Johan Santana, John Maine and Oliver Perez, not to mention returns to form from David Wright and Mike Pelfrey and improvement from Daniel Murphy.

And who could blame him, really? That would require way more analysis than could fit in a 600-word piece, plus would probably be a fool’s errand anyway. None of those things is necessarily a safe bet to happen, though we can hope for all of them.

Remington’s big finish:

It’s a good bet that they’ll get back those six games that they lost with Reyes and Beltran out last year, if not a few more. And that’s pretty close to the prediction offered by Baseball Prospectus’s PECOTA, which predicts the 2010 Mets to finish 78-84. And if they can get just three more wins above that, with Jason Bay’s help, they’d be a .500 ballclub. That’s a tall order, but a win total in the high 70s is eminently reasonable for a team with such pitching problems once you get past Johan Santana.

All of this assumes, of course, that Reyes and Beltran actually are healthy next year. And with the record of the Mets medical staff as of late, that’s a heck of an assumption.

Sounds pretty gloomy to Mets fans, I realize. PECOTA is generally among the most accurate projection systems in baseball — or heck, anything — but I find it difficult to believe that these Mets, if healthy, will only manage 78 wins in 2010.

Then again, I find it difficult to believe these Mets will stay healthy in 2010. Injuries to baseball players often seem to forebode more injuries, and it seems downright delusional to expect the Mets’ top 4 starters to produce 800 innings, as one “Mets higher-up” suggested recently.

Still, assuming Reyes, Wright and Santana break camp healthy and Beltran is on schedule, I’ll take the over on 78.

The bottom line is that projection systems are only that, and though I don’t pretend to understand the mechanics of PECOTA or any other system, I imagine the 2010 Mets are about as hard a club to project as any in history, given the amount of uncertainty.

We can hem and haw all we want about what could go wrong and what might go right, but we won’t know if they’re any good until they start playing games.

An existential jaunt through Jeff Francoeur’s past

Jeff Francoeur said this to Kevin Kernan of the Post yesterday:

“One of my big goals is to have better pitch recognition…. Sometimes you try to say it doesn’t bother you to swing at a bad pitch, but it does. I’m human. I want to get better because I know if I can get better at that the rest of my game will follow. If I can mix in 50-60 walks, I become a totally different guy.”

Sounds awesome, right? Better pitch recognition seems like exactly what Frenchy needs to maintain the level of production he posted in his half season as a Met and avoid slipping back to the sub-replacement level player he was for his final season and a half with the Braves. After all, there’s no doubt he can crush the ball when it’s thrown over the plate.

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution doesn’t have a great archive, but thanks to commenter named “Kyle S at work” at Baseball Think Factory, we can find evidence (most pointing to AJC articles) that Francoeur has actually set out to better recognize pitches in each of the last four offseasons:

2006. 2007. 2008. 2009.

His career walk rates:

2005: 4.0%; 2006: 3.4%; 2007: 6.0%; 2008: 6.0%; 2009: 3.6%.

It’s great that Francoeur knows he needs to walk more. The problem is, there’s no evidence he has the ability to do so. He’s still only 26 — which is sort of amazing given how long it seems like he’s been around — so there’s hope he can finally pull everything together and starts recognizing pitches the way he apparently hopes to.

He’s a Met, so I’ll be rooting for him.

A seven-nation army?

Reading David Waldstein’s feature for the Times about the Mets’ heavy Venezuelan presence in camp this year got me thinking.

Of the guys near-certain to make the 25-man roster, several, as Waldstein notes, are from Venezuela. More are from the United States. Jose Reyes, Luis Castillo and Fernando Tatis are from the Dominican Republic. Ryota Igarashi is from Japan. Oliver Perez is from Mexico. Jason Bay is from Canada.

Not counting Puerto Rico — the birthplace of Carlos Beltran, Alex Cora, Pedro Feliciano and Angel Pagan — since it’s technically a United States territory, that means the Mets are one country shy of potentially fielding a seven-nation army and being able to employ the totally sweet (and eminently coverable) White Stripes song of the same name as a rallying cry.

Longshot roster candidate Tobi Stoner, though he grew up in Maryland, was born in West Germany. Reports all offseason said the Mets could sign Cuban defector Yuniesky Maya.

One non-roster invite, veteran infielder Jolbert Cabrera, is from Colombia. Another, lefty pitcher Travis Blackley, is Australian. Infield prospect Ruben Tejada — who certainly shouldn’t break camp with the big club barring another massive and terrifying run of injuries — is from Panama.

I don’t think any of those guys is likely to make the squad, but this has to happen. I don’t love the White Stripes, but Seven Nation Army is an awesome song, and probably as good a justification for carrying somebody who doesn’t deserve the 25th spot on the roster as any of the others the Mets have had in the past few years.

Do it, Omar.

On the escalating Linda Cohn Speedwagon situation

The inimitable Mike Salfino found this, on the Barnes and Noble page for Linda Cohn’s autobiography:

“Linda Cohn is far hotter than her ‘girl in the locker room’ persona would suggest. I’ve been with her backstage at a rock and roll show. . . . I know.”
—Kevin Cronin, lead vocalist for REO Speedwagon

So there we have it.

I don’t know what Kevin Cronin is implying there, and I don’t think I want to.

I have had precisely one interaction with Linda Cohn in my lifetime. I was covering the Women in Sports Foundation’s annual awards dinner at the Waldorf Astoria for WCSN.com a few years back.

The event probably featured a solid 15-to-1 woman:man ratio — not to mention a ton of beautiful celebrities and free drinks — so it was a pretty sweet gig.

Anyway, the line at the ladies’ bathroom was out the door and down the hall and there was no one else in the men’s room. It so happened that I was using the men’s room at the same moment the women at the back of the line, all hellbent on girl power I suppose, decided to revolt and storm the men’s room.

I had no idea this was going on, of course, and I wanted to look good for all those beautiful celebrities. So while the bathroom attendant was struggling to keep the horde at bay, I was straightening my tie and fixing my hair, totally oblivious to the developing riot right outside.

As I primped, a woman yelled from the doorway, “OK, you can fix your makeup later!”

I looked toward the entrance, and it was Linda Cohn, leading the surge. Startled and humiliated, I ducked out of the bathroom as the crush of angry women stormed past the overwhelmed attendant.

But I heard no REO Speedwagon lyrics that evening.

Linda Cohn can’t fight this feeling anymore

This  uncited bit of info from SportsCenter anchor Linda Cohn’s Wikipedia page, can’t possibly be true. Can it?

Sorry if that’s a bit small. I had to post a screengrab in case it goes away anytime soon. If you can’t read that, click it. It says, “In an interview on WFAN with Mike Francesa, Cohn admitted she occasionally sings backup at REO Speedwagon concerts.”

Not sings “along” at REO Speedwagon concerts. Sings backup.

In a related story, apparently REO Speedwagon still has concerts. Terrible, terrible concerts.

I’m assuming this is some hilarious and creative Wikipedia editing by someone. Good job, someone.

Hat tip to Jake Rake for the find.

Oh how it must burn Steve Phillips, but not like in the way things usually burn Steve Phillips

So Steve Phillips has been replaced as ESPN’s resident GM-turned-analyst by former Blue Jays honcho J.P. Ricciardi.

I don’t know exactly how it’ll shake out — from the news stories I’ve read, it sounds as though Ricciardi’s destined for Baseball Tonight and not necessarily replacing Phillips in his star turn as the third member of the Joe Morgan/Jon Miller Sunday Night Baseball booth.

I read speculation earlier this offseason that Bobby Valentine could be ticketed for that role, but I can’t find anything concrete online. Either way, the good news is that this pretty much confirms Steve Phillips will be nowhere near our TV screens anytime soon, unless he’s on the Today show apologizing again or breaking into our homes to steal our TVs.

I don’t know how Ricciardi will fare on-screen. By most accounts, he had a reputation as an accessible and charismatic GM, but he did have a strange proclivity for saying really weird things. And at least one time, just straight-up lies.

So that should be interesting. Plus Ricciardi, as a former Billy Beane protege, is lumped in with Moneyball and sabermetrics even if many of the moves he made with the Blue Jays don’t exactly speak to those philosophies. So if Ricciardi goes off on some misguided tangent like Phillips used to, it will be amusing — or perhaps maddening — to watch the Murray Chasses of the world point to his words as why stats-based analysis has led baseball astray or whatever.

But while I don’t watch a whole lot of Baseball Tonight anyway now that the MLB Network has launched, here’s hoping Ricciardi turns out better as his new job than he was at his old one, and he can use the platform to bring a better understanding of advanced metrics to a wider audience.

Port St. Lucie awash in good news

Chico Harlan at the Washington Post wrote that the “Nationals’ roster seems unusually well-defined” this morning, but apparently it’s getting a lot, well, less defined this afternoon.

According to Bill Ladson of MLB.com, the Nats agreed to terms with Livan Hernandez on a Minor League deal today.

This is doubly good news for the Mets: First, it means the Mets will not acquire Livan Hernandez at any time in the foreseeable future. Not that the move had been rumored, but, well, it’s always good to have to certainty.

Second, it means there’s a good chance the Mets will face Livan Hernandez several times in 2010.

I don’t mean to discredit the 135 innings Livan scarfed down for the Mets in 2009, especially given how pitiful the Mets’ starting staff was at times last season, but Hernandez’s unique ability to stay healthy enough to make 30+ starts a year has now been entirely mitigated by his inability to retire Major League hitters in any consistent fashion.

Hernandez finished dead last among qualifying pitchers in the Majors with a 76 ERA+ in 2009 after finishing second to last with a 71 ERA+ in 2008. I defy you to find someone who has been permitted to throw so many innings so poorly since Jose Lima.

No one will convince me that Hernandez can offer more to a team than Nelson Figueroa at this point, which is good, because I don’t think anyone’s trying. Even his once-lauded batting abilities have withered with time.