So for whatever reason I’ve found myself listening to the Mets on the radio a bunch the last few days, and Howie Rose and Wayne Hagin seem to maintain that Jerry Manuel is intentionally limiting and manipulating Ruben Tejada’s at-bats to make sure the 20-year-old infielder finishes the season with a batting average above .200.

I have no idea if it’s true, but they’ve said it a few times, and I’ve really got no reason to doubt them.

Didn’t the same thing happen with Ted Williams once? I think so. Except that was aimed at finishing over .400 instead of .200, and it was only on the last day of the season, and Williams refused to sit and wound up hitting .406. So this is just like that, except like a billion times sadder.

Also, honestly: Who decided that whatever mental advantage Tejada gains heading into the offseason with a .200+ batting average will outweigh the benefits he might gain from a few dozen extra Major League at-bats?

I mean, I can’t imagine it matters much one way or another since Tejada’s playing a lot now. But seriously, who makes that call? Is it lame-duck Manuel or lame-duck Omar Minaya? John Ricco? The marketing department?

To me — and this is totally uninformed — it seems like if the Mets were looking to shake the whole “rudderless-ship” perception, they’d at least have someone on board making baseball decisions that had some investment in the team’s future. But then I was basically saying the same thing last year.

After an 0-for-1 day yesterday, Ruben Tejada sits at .199 for the season. The chase continues!

I’m off to Connecticut to talk to some college kids about the Internet. Vendys writeup coming later.

Some fun, if meaningless, stuff coming out of the waning days of the Mets’ season: Chase Utley slid in hard and late on Ruben Tejada on Friday, trying to break up a double play, and several Mets took exception — most notably Carlos Beltran. Then the Mets, powered in part by Beltran, went on to take the next two from the Phillies, scoring a rare road series win and preventing the Phillies from celebrating their inevitable playoff berth in their own clubhouse.

The Mets downplayed the importance of that accomplishment, as they damn well should have, saying they were just happy to be playing good baseball and they should have been playing like this all year. And good. Something always feels messed-up when you hear about a team “relishing the opportunity to play spoiler.” Oh, you do? Why don’t you relish the opportunity to play better baseball for the first 140 games of the season?

Anyway, the whole thing sets up the lamest bit of post hoc ergo propter hoc talk-radio nonsense since “Lastings Milledge woke up the Marlins.” Someone somewhere will suggest — probably already has suggested — that Utley’s slide shook Beltran to life and made him decide, “oh, I guess I’ll start being awesome at baseball again,” even though, as we know, Beltran had been hitting like Beltran for weeks.

The whole affair brings Beltran back into the fore for the first time since the Walter Reed flap. Both the Post and Daily News put Beltran in the focus of their game stories for Sunday, with the Post asserting that he’ll likely be back in 2011 and the News suggesting he’s as good as gone.

It’s going to be one of those offseasons, I suppose. Which is pretty much every offseason. Until we get there, though, we might as well relish this opportunity to watch Carlos Beltran do stuff, knowing that it might be our last to watch him do it in a Mets uniform.

Hothead fireballer K-Rod once beat his girlfriend so badly she had to be hospitalized, a Queens prosecutor said Wednesday.

The chilling assault was revealed in court as Assistant District Attorney Scott Kessler painted Mets closer Francisco Rodriguez as a manipulative bully who flouts the law.

– New York Daily News.

Ugh. Just, ugh.

Though there were rumblings of similar violence earlier in Rodriguez’s recent saga — I believe from an Adam Rubin report I cannot find now — I’ll take this news with at least a tiny grain of salt because it comes straight from the prosecutor in the case, with no word at all from K-Rod’s side.

This site has never been the place for sweeping value judgments and that’s not about to change now, but the thought of domestic violence turns my stomach.

That said — and this is not to excuse the behavior, at all — I’m reminded of a story Peter Botte wrote on Mother’s Day a couple years ago about how Rodriguez hasn’t talked to his parents in 15 years and was separated from half his siblings in infancy. I don’t know Francisco Rodriguez even a little, but there’s a whole lot of evidence suggesting he’s a deeply messed-up dude.

Again, he’s got the resources to get help and by no means should be taking out his issues on his girlfriend and the mother of his children. But it’s too easy to dismiss someone as “evil,” and I think pure evil is something that only exists in action movies. I’d guess that in reality, when you peel back enough layers, you generally just find a whole lot of sadness and desperation.

So there’s that. Shifting tones, the news inarguably lessens the already slim-seeming chances that K-Rod will be closing games for the Mets in 2011. He might be in jail, for one thing. But even if he isn’t, it sure seems like the team won’t want the P.R. hit of breaking camp with the ninth inning assigned to a wife-beater who raises hell in the family room.

How they go about getting rid of him remains to be seen. Same goes for how they replace him.

While de facto closer Hisanori Takahashi has said he kind of likes it here, he has an out clause in his contract and maintains that he would prefer to start.

Takahashi’s peripherals in his starts suggest he might be a bit better than his 5.01 ERA, but he’s a short 35-year-old with the stigma — regardless of if it is more true for him than other pitchers — that his stuff is more effective in relief.

Should he not find an opportunity to compete for some team’s rotation, he seems like a decent and likely reasonably priced option to close out games. Though his arsenal doesn’t profile like that of a traditional closer, Takahashi has struck out 53 batters in 51 innings and pitched to a 2.29 ERA in relief in 2010.

Many Mets fans decried Jerry Manuel’s unwillingness to use the recently shut-down Bobby Parnell as closer. Parnell, after all, throws fastballs about a billion miles an hour. And to his credit, he did it much more effectively this season than last, posting a higher strikeout rate and a lower walk rate and yielding only one home run in his big-league stint.

Just throwing really hard does not a great closer make, but Parnell’s marked improvement in 2010 bodes well for his future and he appears a viable candidate to close out games in 2011.

But that’s probably it for reasonable internal options. Former Nats closer Chad Cordero pitched decently over 16 innings at Buffalo and a guy named Manuel Alvarez dominated High-A and Double-A hitters over 72 2/3 innings, but both seem like mega-longshots.

The worst move, I think, would be to go out and spend a ton in terms of money or prospects on a name-brand closer. If the Mets are going to have limited resources to throw around this offseason, it would seem a big mistake to allocate any big portion of them toward a widely overvalued position best filled from within.