So that ends that nonsense

Apparently the Mets will indeed tender contracts to Mike Pelfrey and Angel Pagan, so that ends that nonsense. I mean, I guess I should hold off on the celebrating until it happens officially, but it makes so much sense for the moves to happen — as it always has — that it doesn’t seem likely the story will change.

The joke is really on me, then, for spending so much time and energy explaining why the Mets should tender contracts to Pelfrey and Pagan (and maybe on you for reading/fretting) when most likely that was always going to be the case, and when any suggestions to the contrary may have been media-driven storylines-for-the-sake-of-storylines written to fill internet space and sell papers by people covering a team facing basically one major compelling offseason roster decision. And since no one knows where Jose Reyes will end up, and since writing the same damn thing about Reyes every day gets old, attention turns elsewhere.

The only other familiar, biggish names that could be ousted under any broad umbrella of twisted logic were Pelfrey and Pagan, so we read tons of stories of the way the team had soured on the pair and were likely looking for inexpensive upgrades that plainly did not (and still do not) exist.

But of course, maybe that’s just my narrative, and maybe there really was something to all those stories and the Mets just changed their minds. Or maybe — and most likely — there’s plenty of gray area.

The most important thing is that the Mets’ front office is doing the logical thing. It doesn’t really matter how the decision played out in the media as long as the correct one is made in the end. But the lesson, I think, is that moving forward it’s best to view with skepticism any pending illogical decisions being attributed to the team’s clearly reasonable decision-makers.

The insanity

Too many people are guessing, theorizing, and pontificating as to what is going on. The agents for Reyes and most of the teams interested in him (including the Mets) have not leaked much information and that has people grasping for things. And to generate stories, people are taking leaps of faith. The biggest was those was on Sunday when it was leaked by one member of the media that a Reyes deal with the Marlins was done except for some minor details. PLEASE STOP THE INSANITY!

For example, some people suggest that Hanley Ramirez has been asked to switch positions — others contend he has not. Some says it is a slam dunk he will move anywhere — even center field. The only thing I can tell you is Hanley Ramirez said as recently as Friday,”I am the shortstop right now.”

Rich Coutinho, WFAN.com.

All requisite hot-stove snark aside for a second, what percentage of baseball’s offseason rumors would you say are legitimately attached to actual front-office proceedings? I don’t mean nebulous “discussings” or “coulds” or “considerings.” I mean the real stuff — trade proposals, free-agent offers, things like that. Those can’t account for more than, what, 30 percent of the rumors, right?

And then think about how often a deal goes down that you hadn’t heard rumored at all. What percentage of the things that are actually happening do you think the things that are reported to be happening represent? I bet it’s not much. Maybe 20 percent, tops.

So even though there are decent reporters out there doing good work in the hot-stove season, it’s easy — perhaps even sensible — to get overwhelmed and frustrated with the glut of unsubstantiated nonsense, especially when there’s so little reward for sifting through the crap to find the real news.

To me it seems like the most productive use of offseason time is to avoid all speculative information and to instead just wait until deals actually get done and decide what I think about them then.

Something else to consider: When you see anonymously sourced hot-stove news credited to a team source, what’s in it for the team source? Why are we reading so many reports about the Marlins’ wooing free agents and so few about every other team? Are the Marlins really the only team pursuing free agents, or are they the only team very invested in having you know that they’re pursuing free agents?

That is, unless Luis Hernandez makes a late push

Plan A is still Jose Reyes, but the Mets already have formulated Plan B.

If Reyes is not re-signed, the Mets may try to compensate for that loss of offense by attempting to make Daniel Murphy the full-time second baseman, according to an organizational source.

Mike Puma, N.Y. Post.

Not to toot my own horn, but I suggested exactly the same thing on the Mostly Mets Podcast a couple weeks ago.

Actually, wait: Absolutely to toot my own horn. Here’s a photo of my own horn. Toot!

Point is, it makes a hell of a lot of sense. I didn’t have any organizational sources or anything, but if Reyes leaves, Ruben Tejada becomes the most obvious internal candidate to play shortstop, leaving a hole at second and the Mets missing Reyes’ bat.

At the end of the season, a reporter asked Terry Collins why he wouldn’t give Murphy a position to spend the offseason working on. Collins said he was waiting to see “where some guys end up.” I read that at the time to mean that Murphy would concentrate on second if Reyes left. This report adds a little weight to that, but really no more than common sense does.

This happened

OMG OMG OMG OMG.

I’m not going to bother cutting these up and putting them in chronological order because I assume you’ve been on the Internet for a while and you’re pretty good at decoding these things by now. You’ve seen Memento, right?

Ahh… ahh… holy hell, the awesome. It’s blinding.

What do you think they talked about? I mean, I know they talked about knuckleballs. But do you think they told like, stories of different sticky life situations their knuckleballs got them out of? Great knuckleballs they have thrown? The sense of alienation a knuckleballer feels in a rotation full of conventional pitchers?

I mean we’re talking a full day and a half’s worth of conversation here, so that’s a lot of knuckleball-speak. Presumably they covered all those topics and more, maybe some deep knuckleball talk we civilians can’t even really conceive with our current level of understanding.

In any case, it was probably sweet. I hope they resisted the urge to hold a knuckleball competition though. C’mon guys, this was supposed to be a bonding thing.

Hat tip to Eric Simon.

The Mostly Mets Podcast: Is it good?

Things are going to slow down a bit here today because I’m working on a couple of longer things I’m hoping to publish tomorrow. But I encourage you to spend whatever time you might spend reading TedQuarters to listen to this week’s edition of the Mostly Mets Podcast if you are able to and you haven’t already.

I think it’s good. But I must admit that I don’t listen to many podcasts. Because I spend a decent portion of my workdays writing, I usually prefer the words bouncing around in my head while I’m at my desk to be the ones that will ultimately wind up on this page. I find I can’t even really listen to music with lyrics lest I start drifting into weird and barely intelligible Robert Plant tangents in the middle of blog posts about Taco Bell or whatever. I sit in silence, or listen to my Bad Plus and Miles Davis stations on Pandora.

But that’s me. I want to know about you. Please help us help you by taking this quick five-question survey on podcasts.

Reality has strangled invention

Just a friendly reminder that on the same day Randy at the Apple attempted (with the help of this guy) to determine the free-agent implications of Jose Reyes’ lunch order, the N.Y. Post attempted to determine the free-agent implications of Reyes’ months-old rap song and several media outlets reported that Reyes ate with Marlins’ brass at Joe’s Stone Crab.

So we beat on.

Mostly Mets Podcast

Are you listening to these? You should be. No joke; I think they’re really getting good. We talk about so much stuff. Toby and I talk a lot, and then sometimes Patrick peps up to say something smart and I shout him down because YOU SHUT UP I’M THE LOUDEST.

It’s on iTunes here. Tell Toby about my hair by emailing MostlyMetsPodcast@gmail.com.

Show rundown:
0:00: Stuff
2:30: Reyes stuff
Pitching prospect stuff
21:00: Twitter questions
Will any outfielder play 150 games?
What is Paul DePodesta doing RIGHT NOW?
Yoenis Cespedes spit-roast a pig with me.
40:00: Weekly discussion of David Wright rumors
Toby stabs me in the heart

Someone reads meaning into Jose Reyes’ lyrics

Remember when Jay-Z said, “I got 99 problems but a bitch ain’t one”? That was true. At that time, he had precisely 99 problems and none of them involved a female dog.

It’s an under-reported truth that all rap lyrics are meant to be interpreted literally. Seriously. The members of N.W.A. just wanted to encourage listeners to have sex with police officers. Go to Tone Loc’s house right now and you will still see the Spuds McKenzie-shaped hole in his door from the incident with his dog and the Funky Cold Medina.

Somehow, all this has gone unrecognized far too long in sports journalism. Luckily, Kevin Kernan is here to clear it all up:

In his song and video “No Hay Amigo’’ that was released in July, Reyes sings the following powerful words:

“There are no friends. A friend is a dollar in my pocket. As soon as you turn your back your friends want to stab you in the back. A real friend is a glass full of water in the desert to quench your thirst. … Where were you when I used to practice without any food to eat or when I used to spend a week with the same T-shirt? There are no friends. My friends are my mother and my father, the ones who struggled with me to make me who I am.’’

The Mets are no longer Reyes’ friends….

The Mets cannot quench Reyes’ thirst.

Telling.