Wally Backman on Brooklyn prospects

I had a chance to talk to Wally Backman for a while at Mets Fantasy Camp. There’ll be more from that here sometime soon. We talked a bit about some of the prospects he had in Brooklyn this year. Here’s what he had to say:

Ted Berg: Obviously Cory Vaughn and Darrell Ceciliani had big years.

Wally Backman: To me they’re both Major League prospects. I think Darrell Ceciliani is going to be a guy that hits for average. Cory Vaughn’s got some power. He’s going to have to worry about his strikeouts — he has got to work on keeping his bat through the hitting zone longer. Ceciliani is real good at that.

They’re both pretty much complete packages. Darrell doesn’t have the power that Cory shows, but he’s a line-drive type hitter. He does have some power — he’s got some pop in his bat. Darrell’s going to be a kid that hits for a high average, and I think he’s going to eventually turn into a left fielder. He’s got great speed but he’s left-handed. Cory will probably stay in right field because of his arm strength.

They have a chance, as long as they stay healthy. I would like to see [the Mets] push those guys hard. I don’t know that they’ll do that, but I’d like to see both those guys go to St. Lucie this year and then possibly end up in Binghamton if they have a good half-year. And then they’re right there.

I think the other guy that has a chance is Ryan Fraser, the pitcher we drafted this last year. He sits at 94 mph with a 60 breaking ball, so if his command continues to improve, I’d put him on a fast track as well. The other kids we had in Brooklyn I think are more level-to-level players.

TB: Anyone else that should be on the Mets fan’s radar?

WB: Yohan Almonte, the young starting pitcher. He reminds me of a small Pedro Martinez, he–

TB: Smaller than Pedro?

WB: He’s smaller than Pedro. He did a great job for us this year. He’s only at 91 or 92 mph but he has got a great changeup and throws his breaking ball for strikes. So he throws all three pitches for strikes, and in the Penn league last year that made him pretty successful.

Well that’s nice to hear

I just want him to be David Wright. I want him to be a good hitter. I know one thing, with our new hitting coach, who I think is gonna do a great job, I think he’ll be a little more selective at the plate, because of our philosophy, and so he’ll get more pitches to hit and I think he’ll do damage with those pitches.

Terry Collins.

I’d love to see it in practice first, of course, but this is excellent to hear. People love to blame Howard Johnson for Wright’s struggles, and I have no idea if that’s legit criticism or just baseless speculation. Wright always praises HoJo, but then Wright’s not really the type to rip any of his coaches in public.

What’s obvious is that Wright was not as good in 2009 and 2010 that he was from 2006 to 2008. In consecutive seasons, he struck out more and walked less. He’s still great, but the trend is bad. Learning to be more selective — even for a patient hitter like Wright — could help reverse it. Or maybe just having input from a different voice.

And Collins’ point emphasizes one I have tried to make several times: For a hitter to produce runs, he must be selective. It’s not an either/or. To sustain yourself as a power hitter in the Major Leagues, you must know how to wait for your pitch. Not all power hitters walk as often as Wright, but they all walk sometimes. You have to know what you can and can’t hit (inside or outside the strike zone) and be able to somewhat regularly lay off the latter.

I don’t really see what about that is complicated, but an interminable Twitter argument I suffered through on Friday reminded me that it’s not something all fans are willing to grasp.

There will be blips, of course — Jeff Francoeur and Mike Jacobs have both enjoyed them. But eventually, well, you know.

Spring Training stuff

I may have complained about being busy over the past couple of weeks, and one small part of that is because I’ve been planning and arranging a Spring Training trip.

This will be my first in a professional capacity. I went to Port St. Lucie for a long weekend in March with my dad and grandfather when I was 10, and then, in college, took a whirlwind tour of the Grapefruit League on the nerdiest Spring Break ever with a couple of my roommates.

I should be down there starting on Feb. 23, when the Mets are still in workouts, staying through the first week and a half of games.

Anyway, now the challenge is to come up with what to do when I’m there. I’m certainly going to have video responsibilities and I’m hoping that should produce some reasonably entertaining stuff. And obviously I’m going to be writing stuff.

But what stuff!? Some of it will probably come up on the fly, but I’d love your input. Plus I figured out how to use this contact-form thing Cerrone sometimes trots out.

You can make suggestions in the comments section if you want to discuss them publicly, or send ’em straight to me by filling them in below. Do you want to know who is the best shape of his life? Which pitcher is tinkering with a new pitch? Do you have a hot tip on a good sandwich on Florida’s Treasure Coast?

Also, I’m kidding about the spam thing. If you want an email back you should use your real address, but if you want to remain anonymous feel free to make one up.

← Back

Thank you for your response. ✨

So it goes

So that’s the end of the Jets’ season then. I suppose if you’re a Jets fan and you’re reading this you don’t need a recap. You’re probably already replaying all the different little things that might have made the five-point difference that cost Gang Green the game: Mark Sanchez’s fumbling, Ben Roethlisberger’s scrambling, the ridiculous play-calling down on the goal line.

Whatever. What happens happens, I suppose, and there’s no real sense playing the what-if game now. I imagine Brian Schottenheimer will emerge as the goat for this one, for passing the ball twice when the Jets needed a yard to score, for the miscommunication with Sanchez over play calls, for eyebrow-raising decisions all season long.

It’s disappointing, of course. But somehow not as disappointing as it would have been if they just rolled over and died in Pittsburgh like it seemed they were about to. And two straight seasons in the AFC Championship is nothing to sneeze at.

The good news is Rex Ryan will be back and Sanchez will be back and D’Brickashaw Ferguson and Nick Mangold and Darrelle Revis will be back. People like to say the Jets are a “win-now” team because they do have a bunch of old players. But their core — their best players — are still in the thick of their primes.

Of course, first things first, we have to know there’ll be football at all next season before we worry about Jets football. But then I have a feeling things will get hammered out. Everyone involved stands to lose a whole lot of money if there’s no football.

Anyway, now we get the Packers and Steelers in two weeks and then less than a fortnight until pitchers and catchers. Hold your head up, Mark Sanchez. Your Taco Bell is on me.

Sandwich of the Week

This sandwich, from a pizza place, comes on recommendation from former intern Jimmy, a former pizza-place employee who knows a thing or two about pizza places. Incidentally, if you’re a college student eligible for college credit, you too could have the opportunity to work here for no money and recommend sandwiches to me — especially if you have a background in web design or programming. I don’t hire our interns, but if you email me your resume I’ll put it in the right hands.

The sandwich: The “Tuesday” sandwich from Previti Pizza, 41st St. between Park and Lexington in Manhattan.

(Note: This sandwich is only available on Tuesdays and Thursdays. I don’t know what happens if you go in and ask for it on a Wednesday, but you could always try and then fall back on the delicious-looking pizza if you can’t get it. Plus if they have a Tuesday sandwich then it stands to reason they probably have a Wednesday sandwich, and maybe that’s really good too.)

The construction: Roast beef with jus, fresh mozzarella cheese, garlic butter and sour cream and onion potato chips on house-baked bread.

Yeah, you read that right. Sour cream and onion chips. On the sandwich.

Important background information: I am Italian and I love garlic. One time I smoked a bunch of garlic cloves in my home smoker, and though I intended to use them in more involved concoctions, I wound up just eating most of them as snacks. When a recipe calls for garlic, I generally double the amount. My wife and I have spent time discussing whether anything could really be too garlicky, since I’ve never reached that mark with anything I’ve made at home.

What it looks like:


How it tastes: Really good, and really garlicky. Maybe on the cusp of critical garlic, that ever-elusive “too garlicky” distinction. Not quite there, because it was still quite tasty. Just don’t plan on spending your afternoon making out with anyone who hasn’t also eaten this sandwich.

The bread is the highlight here. I’m not sure if it’s just a ball of pizza dough baked to crispiness and sliced in half or not — it tastes like it could be — but it’s got a great, crispy crust and a nice doughy inside that soaks up all the roast beef and cheese juices. It’s clearly fresh, and it comes piping hot. The one thing, though, is there’s some sort of powdered seasoning on the outside part of the bread that gets all over your fingers and also might be responsible for taking this thing up to that garlic threshold. Salty, too.

Inside the sandwich, the roast beef, cheese, potato chips and garlic butter all kind of ooze together into a delicious meatcake. Because it’s all hot, the roast beef is more toward the well-done side and doesn’t have that rare redness on the inside that a lot of roast beef enthusiasts are partial too, but then if you’re looking for a sandwich that emphasizes the roast beef your probably in the wrong place. The essence of this sandwich is the combination of textures — crispy bread, meaty beef, gooey cheese, crunchy chips — and though you can taste all the elements, the most powerful flavor, by far, is the garlic.

The sour cream and onion chips, I should mention, are an inspired addition. They don’t hold perfectly hold their crunchiness because of all the juices inside the sandwich, but then there’s a heck of a lot of crunch from the crust of the bread anyway. And the seasoning gives it a nice, familiar, potato-chippy aftertaste. Really clutch for those of us who like to accompany sandwiches with potato chips, because now you don’t even have to bother opening the bag and eating them one by one, they’re already on there so chow down brother.

(Incidentally — and I know this sounds gross — crumbled up Nacho Cheese Doritos go pretty well on a hot dog. Try it before you judge it.)

What it’s worth: It came with a can of soda, and I believe it ran me $8. And since it’s right near Grand Central and I ate it for lunch on a day I was coming in late, it wasn’t really out of my way at all. Certainly well worth the cost — especially when you consider the price of lunch in Midtown.

How it rates: Russ from programming is going to get on me about this, but I’ve got to put it in the 80s. It clearly needed something more to make the Hall of Fame — perhaps some sweet element like a marinara? — and maybe a bit less saltiness and garlic flavor. But it was still really good, as all sandwiches in the 80s are.

That’s the thing — I normally eat way more sandwiches than I review here, so only the notable ones get written up. I bring a sandwich for lunch most days that’s probably in the 50s. I had a sandwich from the deli around the corner last night that was probably high 60s. I imagine sandwiches could be charted on a bell curve of excellence, so there are more sandwiches in the 70s than the 80s and more sandwiches in the 80s than the 90s. So shut up, Russ. Also, that meeting you run is excruciatingly boring. You should consider PowerPoint or a musical interlude or bringing in the Knicks City Dancers or something. 83 out of 100.