Happy birthday, Val Pascucci

As Adam Rubin pointed out, Boss turns 32 today.

According to this report on MetsLocker.com, Pascucci will be back for another go of it with the Mets in 2011. I have no reason to doubt the report — I don’t imagine the people at MetsLocker.com traffic in making up totally plausible stories about Quad-A mashers re-signing — but since I didn’t see Pascucci’s return noted anywhere else I’m trying to get confirmation from the Mets.

I’m hoping to get down to Spring Training this year. If Pascucci’s going to be there you can pretty much bank on a really awkward web video in which I ask him if he knows that to this day, half the time one of my articles is linked at MetsBlog, someone brings up his name.

(And I’m still happy to point out that the Mets fell a single game short after giving 151 plate appearances to Marlon Anderson in 2008 — nearly all of them while he was pinch hitting or playing first base or left field. Anderson rewarded them with a .540 OPS while Pascucci was slugging better than that in New Orleans.)

Anyway, I’ll keep looking for more info on Pascucci’s return. But in the meantime, here’s hoping he enjoys his birthday.

Matter matters

Reading this article in the Times, I got a little confused over the difference between anti-matter and dark matter. I poked around the Wikipedia a bit, and though I still have no idea what either is really about, I figured I’d make this chart to help sort them out:

Anti-matter Dark matter Family Matters
First conceived 1928 1934 1989
Created by The Low Energy Antiproton Ring, in laboratory experiments Supersymmetric particles William Bickley and Michael Warren
Product of The Big Bang Unknown Spin-off from Perfect Strangers
Accounts for 50% of what was produced by the Big Bang 80% of the matter in the universe 25% of ABC’s TGIF lineup
Current status Has been created in labs, but theorized to be absent from space Hypothetical, but inferred to exist Canceled in 1998 following disappointing ratings
Preferred storage method No container made of matter, since the anti-matter would annihilate itself and an equal amount of the container Not applicable Released on DVD in June, 2010
Confuses people because If the Big Bang created equal amounts of matter and anti-matter, and anti-matter annihilates matter, why is there all this stuff around? No direct observational evidence of its existence; could it be that gravity behaves differently at different scales of the universe? What’s the backstory with Rachel again? Why does she live there? Why is she wasting time that could be dedicated to Urkel?
Reginald VelJohnson? No Doubtful Yes

About this thing

I had a long conversation toward the end of the season with Wright about essentially the same subject. Actually, it was more me talking and Wright saying he was interested and to keep talking. The subject was this: I wish I could transport Wright out of the Mets clubhouse to a more professional team such as the Yankees or Red Sox so he could see how different that atmosphere was in those places.

What I told Wright was that I looked at him and a few others in the Mets’ clubhouse as an oasis around too much unprofessionalism. And I suggested that he had been at the party so long –- a lifetime Met –- that he was losing the ability to distinguish between acceptable and unacceptable. I pointed out various elements both in front of us about how cavalierly players were preparing for that day’s game; the lack of structure, discipline, seriousness.

Joel Sherman, N.Y. Post.

OK, I should start by saying that for all I know, Wright does have a problem with the way the Mets’ clubhouse has been run the past couple of seasons. From what little Wright demonstrates of his personality to the public, we know that he is an extremely hard worker and very, very dedicated player.

But him coming out and saying on the record that his teammates need to take their preparation more seriously would be very different from him just maybe nodding as Sherman told him that his teammates need to take their preparation more seriously. And I find it difficult to put too much stock in second-hand quotes from Wright via Larry Bowa, for that matter.

I’ve been through this about a billion times before and I’m not all that eager to revisit it, but problems in the clubhouse — at least the type reporters see — are almost entirely based on confirmation bias (and I don’t think players are immune to that).

The first example I can think of is the one I mentioned here: When the 2007 Rockies played video games in the Dodgers’ clubhouse before a game during their miracle run, they were praised for their loose, fun-loving unity. When Oliver Perez did the same thing the next year, he should have been watching video or something. The 2010 Mets themselves were celebrated for their attitude when they were winning; it was “toward the end of the season” when Sherman voiced to Wright his concerns about their unprofessionalism.

I think I can add a little context here, too. Since the Mets moved to Citi Field, it has become way harder for reporters to get a sense of what players do before games. In the locker room before most Mets’ home games, you’ll usually see at most four or five Mets sitting by their lockers listening to music or texting, and somewhere between 20 and 40 members of the media standing in the middle of the room, just kind of waiting to see if something interesting happens.

The other players will pass through — they’ll quickly throw on their uniforms on their way to the batting cage, or out to the field for warmups and batting practice. But they tend to spend most of the time before games — at least the time that the locker room is open to the media — in back rooms of the clubhouse where reporters can’t go, doing something that is presumably way more awesome than standing around listening to Joel Sherman tell you that your team lacks discipline.

The beat reporters who travel with the team might get a better sense of it because the players don’t have nearly as much space in visiting clubhouses, but I’m not sure anyone besides the players and coaches themselves is qualified to weigh in on the full breadth of preparation that Major Leaguers — even the Mets — endeavor to get ready for games.

And though it’s impossible to argue that the Mets were structured, disciplined and serious in 2010 — they were not a winning team, after all — it doesn’t seem fair to put those words in Wright’s mouth simply because he was too polite to walk away from them.

Early offseason deal roundup

It’s still very early in the offseason, but there was a trio of deals yesterday — one bigger than the others. All appear to have at least some implications for the Mets’ offseason, so I figured I’d run through them quickly here.

The deal: Marlins trade Dan Uggla to the Braves for Omar Infante and Mike Dunn.

Why they did it: The Braves traded from strength to instantly upgrade their offense with Uggla, who’s good for 30 home runs a year and an OBP around .360. The Marlins save money — Uggla earned $7.8 million last year and is entering his last arbitration year coming off the best offensive season, while Infante stands to make only $2.5 million. They also add a promising, if wild, young reliever in Dunn.

Local flavor: It means a) the Braves appear set to be pretty damn good next year and b) the Mets will not get Dan Uggla to play second base in 2011. The first point is more troubling than the second; while Uggla would make the Mets a much better team in 2011, to keep him around beyond next year they’d need to give him a pretty hefty extension. Uggla already isn’t much of a fielder, and he’s only likely to get worse as he ages.

The deal: Marlins and catcher John Buck agree to a three-year, $18 million deal.

Why they did it: Ahh… Well, Buck had a nice season last year, though it certainly doesn’t seem sustainable. Buck walked only 16 times in 437 plate appearances — the lowest walk rate of his career — and enjoyed a batting average and batting average on balls in play that were about 40 points higher than his career norms. And the Marlins needed a catcher.

Local flavor: The Mets will need a catcher as well. Josh Thole played well enough in his first 90 Major League games to earn the chance to start out of the gate in 2011, but a contingency plan and backup is necessary. Seems to me they’d be best-served finding a guy healthy enough to hold up as a starter if Thole falters, rather than a career backup like fan favorites Ramon Castro or Henry Blanco (incidentally, Rod Barajas might not be a bad choice). It’s way too early in the offseason to say if Buck’s seemingly too-big contract reflects some weird shift in the catching market, though.

The deal: Cardinals sign Jake Westbrook to a two-year, $16.5 million contract.

Why they did it: A two-year deal for a 33-year-old pitcher who spent most of 2008 and all of 2009 on the disabled list might raise some eyebrows, but Westbrook stayed healthy in 2010 and pitched well for the Cardinals down the stretch, and it’s probably fair to just defer to Dave Duncan on assessing veteran innings-eaters at this point.

Local flavor: With Johan Santana out for who-knows-how-long, the Mets definitely need starting pitching this offseason. Cliff Lee is out of their price range, and both Ted Lilly and Westbrook were locked up by their teams. There are a few decent innings-eating options remaining but it doesn’t appear as though they’ll come cheap this offseason. And there have been conflicting reports on the Mets’ payroll flexibility. If they really only have $5 million to play with — which I tend to doubt, honestly — they’ll likely be priced out of all the reliable starters on the market, and forced to take risks on guys coming off injury or bad seasons.