Jamey writes NewbergReport.com.
Oh yeah, Nick Evans
The most interesting guy who played first for the Mets in their full-season minor leagues in 2010? Nick Evans. Yeah, that’s a long way from being The Most Interesting Man in the World, but it’s a start. Evans beat up AA pitching at a .294/.366/.527 rate and kept going in AAA where hit hit .314/.385/.557. Along the way, he totalled 44 doubles and 23 home runs in 125 minor league games. He even hit a little bit in the big leagues this time through, going .306/.324/.472 in 36 AB. He’s always hit lefties much better than righties and could well be a cheap bench piece next year who could play a little first, left or third in a dire emergency.
And that’s the weird part of Evans’ whole season. The Mets did not prepare him for a utility role. He played 12 games at third in AA and four in AAA, and just two in the outfield. Early on, the idea was that playing Evans at the same position everyday would help him get comfortable. At some point, like when he was crushing the ball, he should have played more third and more left to put himself in a position to help the big league club.
– Toby Hyde, MetsMinorLeagueBlog.com.
One of the less-heralded baffling decisions among the many made by the last administration in Flushing was not letting Evans regularly play the outfield in the Minors this season, even though he reportedly requested time there. It will be interesting to see how the next front office handles the oft-forgotten Evans, who has nothing to prove in the Minors and no options remaining on his contract.
Since Evans mashes lefties — including in his small 121 at-bat Major League sample — and offers some defensive flexibility, it seems like a no-brainer to keep him around in the righty bench bat role once filled by Fernando Tatis.
Since left field and third base will be filled by right-handers and right field will likely be manned by a switch-hitter, there probably won’t be a ton of chances for Evans until someone gets hurt. As Duke suggested in the comments section yesterday, Evans could probably combine with Lucas Duda to create a reasonable-hitting corner outfield platoon, though that could be a bit frightening defensively.
That’s really all I have to say about Nick Evans, I guess. Slow day in Metsland. Basically, the dude is too good, too young, and too inexpensive to be passed through waivers, and it will be a pretty damning indictment of the next GM if he or she goes out and spends a couple million on a righty bench bat only to cast Evans aside.
Probably the best thing that’s ever happened
The Vikings and Brett Favre stage their own reenactment of the Simpsons’ epic “Man Getting Hit By Football.”
I don’t know what part of this is making me laugh the hardest: plain-old football in the groin, which is plenty funny on its own; the fact that it’s a football to Brett Favre’s much-discussed groin at this particular moment in history; or imagining the way my mom is going to crack up when she sees this.
As a great man once said, it works on so many levels.
Hat tip to James K and Pavan for the video, which makes life worth living.
Shocking news: BCS system nonsense
Excellent read, in which Bill James calls the BCS computerized rankings “nonsense math.” Hat tip to Chris M for the link. Sorry for the link-heavy morning here; busy day in the office. More stuff coming in the afternoon.
25 best lines from Moneybart
Very quotable episode. Best I’ve seen in a while, though I haven’t watched The Simpsons regularly in ten years.
Best playoff pitching matchup in history?
The baseball-reference blog points out that Tim Lincecum and Roy Halladay both turned in top-10 all-time gamescores in their first starts this postseason and ponders if it’s the best playoff pitching matchup in history. Kinda hard to top Roger Clemens-Pedro Martinez in the 1999 ALCS — even if Clemens got torched that night and was coming off a bad season. Also of note: Owner of the third-best postseason pitching gamescore ever? You guessed it: Babe Ruth.
Seriously?
Two-timing Chilean miner Yonni Barrios went from being trapped a half-mile underground to real trouble when the first person who greeted him after he was rescued Wednesday was his mistress — not his wife.
Barrios gave a smiling Susan Valenzuela a smooch seen around the world moments after he was released from the rescue capsule.
Smiling broadly even as the TV cameras broadcast his betrayal of wife Marta Salinas, Barrios did not appear perturbed that his love triangle had exploded into a soap opera with an international following.
– Corky Siemaszko and Bill Hutchinson, N.Y. Daily News.
Seriously? So the Daily News apparently set out to find the seediest possible angle to the most heartwarming story in recent memory, and the best they could dig up was that one of the 33 miners was separated from his wife and now has a new girlfriend. This gets the front page, with the incredible headline “HOLE-Y SNIT!” and an overlay reading “RED HOT IN CHILE!”
Amazing.
I mean, not to get all high and mighty or anything, but this guy was trapped in a f#@$ing mine for 70 days. Now you’re plastering the details of his personal life on the cover of a paper thousands of miles away? I don’t know what type of freaky escapade he’d have to endeavor immediately upon surfacing to get me to judge him, but it’d have to be something way, way more foul than kissing his girlfriend because he’s separated from his wife.
I love this newspaper. I really do. I know I rip it a lot here but it’s only because I read it every morning. I thought about splurging for the Times today because I knew not a lot happened in sports last night and I wasn’t all that excited to read even more about A.J. Burnett, but I’m so happy I stayed loyal. The gray lady covered the same story, but without the News’ trademark punch.
And it’s comforting to me to know that — though I haven’t checked — the Post has likely already assigned Yonni Barrios some ridiculous nickname like “The Cavern Casanova” and by tomorrow will be three cycles past his current marital issues and onto sordid details of the orgies he hosted in college or something.
It’s an exciting time to be alive.
File under: T-shirts I will soon have
This one’s on it’s way to my house. Obviously. Order yours here.
Hunter stalks his prey, which happens to be Craig Sager
Kind of a jackassy thing to do, but when you dress like that you must know you increase your chances of having beer dumped on your head, especially when it’s an elimination game of a playoff series so you’re definitely going to be in an alcohol-soaked clubhouse. Hat tip to Repoz.
Did MLB quiet TBS?
Craig Calcaterra passes along a conspiracy theory from The Common Man:
To The Common Man, it suggests that perhaps TBS was asked not to make a big deal out of potentially missed calls. This would seem to jive with an earlier play in the San Francisco-Atlanta series, where Buster Posey was clearly out at 2B, but announcers refused to acknowledge it, in spite of the video evidence to the contrary (and Posey saying after the game “it’s a good thing we don’t have instant replay).
If this is the case, it seems likely that the commissioner’s office has made conscious decision not just to ignore the loud cries for expanded instant replay, but to tacitly suppress them by denying these voices additional evidence with which to make their case.
Calcaterra adds:
I thought the Posey thing was totally bizarre, and was made even more bizarre when Mat Winer, the studio host, said he thought Posey was safe and was basically laughed off the stage by David Wells, Cal Ripken and Dennis Eckersley. Winer would be beholden to a TBS/MLB mandate in ways that Eck, Ripken and Boomer really wouldn’t be.
So is there a conspiracy at play here? Did Major League Baseball ask TBS announcers to downplay discussions of bad umpiring?
I’m going to go ahead and say no.
Now perhaps I’m biased, since I’m occasionally the subject of similar conspiracy theories myself. And you must allow the small possibility that, as a representative of a team-owned network, I am part of the machine and have been assigned by Bud Selig to quash these rumors before they gain too much steam.
But that’s not actually the case, and I’m guessing neither Selig nor anyone in his office told anyone at TBS anything about what to say in the broadcast. I’d go with Occam’s Razor, like Calcaterra suggests.
If anything, I’d guess their producer told them that harping too much on a few bad calls diminishes the drama inherent in the actual sport part of the sport, which the announcers have to play up — not so much to benefit the league office as to keep people watching the damn broadcast.
Plus, the game’s moving forward; TBS has to show the next pitch, the broadcasters have to focus on what’s happening in front of them and all the folks in the production truck have jobs to do that might preclude them from replaying the same bad call ad infinitum.
Also, really fleshing this conspiracy theory out, I’m not sure it even benefits Major League Baseball to protect its umpires this October. If there are really going to be discussions about how to better umpiring and incorporate instant replay this winter, why enact some nefarious scheme that only works to the advantage of the umpire’s union?
Certainly it protects the product on the field, but Major League Baseball must realize that it has a monopoly on professional baseball, and it’s going to take a hell of a lot of bad umpiring before people start tuning out.
So I’m sticking with no. But of course, they could be paying me to write that.