A seven-nation army?

Reading David Waldstein’s feature for the Times about the Mets’ heavy Venezuelan presence in camp this year got me thinking.

Of the guys near-certain to make the 25-man roster, several, as Waldstein notes, are from Venezuela. More are from the United States. Jose Reyes, Luis Castillo and Fernando Tatis are from the Dominican Republic. Ryota Igarashi is from Japan. Oliver Perez is from Mexico. Jason Bay is from Canada.

Not counting Puerto Rico — the birthplace of Carlos Beltran, Alex Cora, Pedro Feliciano and Angel Pagan — since it’s technically a United States territory, that means the Mets are one country shy of potentially fielding a seven-nation army and being able to employ the totally sweet (and eminently coverable) White Stripes song of the same name as a rallying cry.

Longshot roster candidate Tobi Stoner, though he grew up in Maryland, was born in West Germany. Reports all offseason said the Mets could sign Cuban defector Yuniesky Maya.

One non-roster invite, veteran infielder Jolbert Cabrera, is from Colombia. Another, lefty pitcher Travis Blackley, is Australian. Infield prospect Ruben Tejada — who certainly shouldn’t break camp with the big club barring another massive and terrifying run of injuries — is from Panama.

I don’t think any of those guys is likely to make the squad, but this has to happen. I don’t love the White Stripes, but Seven Nation Army is an awesome song, and probably as good a justification for carrying somebody who doesn’t deserve the 25th spot on the roster as any of the others the Mets have had in the past few years.

Do it, Omar.

On the escalating Linda Cohn Speedwagon situation

The inimitable Mike Salfino found this, on the Barnes and Noble page for Linda Cohn’s autobiography:

“Linda Cohn is far hotter than her ‘girl in the locker room’ persona would suggest. I’ve been with her backstage at a rock and roll show. . . . I know.”
—Kevin Cronin, lead vocalist for REO Speedwagon

So there we have it.

I don’t know what Kevin Cronin is implying there, and I don’t think I want to.

I have had precisely one interaction with Linda Cohn in my lifetime. I was covering the Women in Sports Foundation’s annual awards dinner at the Waldorf Astoria for WCSN.com a few years back.

The event probably featured a solid 15-to-1 woman:man ratio — not to mention a ton of beautiful celebrities and free drinks — so it was a pretty sweet gig.

Anyway, the line at the ladies’ bathroom was out the door and down the hall and there was no one else in the men’s room. It so happened that I was using the men’s room at the same moment the women at the back of the line, all hellbent on girl power I suppose, decided to revolt and storm the men’s room.

I had no idea this was going on, of course, and I wanted to look good for all those beautiful celebrities. So while the bathroom attendant was struggling to keep the horde at bay, I was straightening my tie and fixing my hair, totally oblivious to the developing riot right outside.

As I primped, a woman yelled from the doorway, “OK, you can fix your makeup later!”

I looked toward the entrance, and it was Linda Cohn, leading the surge. Startled and humiliated, I ducked out of the bathroom as the crush of angry women stormed past the overwhelmed attendant.

But I heard no REO Speedwagon lyrics that evening.

Linda Cohn can’t fight this feeling anymore

This  uncited bit of info from SportsCenter anchor Linda Cohn’s Wikipedia page, can’t possibly be true. Can it?

Sorry if that’s a bit small. I had to post a screengrab in case it goes away anytime soon. If you can’t read that, click it. It says, “In an interview on WFAN with Mike Francesa, Cohn admitted she occasionally sings backup at REO Speedwagon concerts.”

Not sings “along” at REO Speedwagon concerts. Sings backup.

In a related story, apparently REO Speedwagon still has concerts. Terrible, terrible concerts.

I’m assuming this is some hilarious and creative Wikipedia editing by someone. Good job, someone.

Hat tip to Jake Rake for the find.

Oh how it must burn Steve Phillips, but not like in the way things usually burn Steve Phillips

So Steve Phillips has been replaced as ESPN’s resident GM-turned-analyst by former Blue Jays honcho J.P. Ricciardi.

I don’t know exactly how it’ll shake out — from the news stories I’ve read, it sounds as though Ricciardi’s destined for Baseball Tonight and not necessarily replacing Phillips in his star turn as the third member of the Joe Morgan/Jon Miller Sunday Night Baseball booth.

I read speculation earlier this offseason that Bobby Valentine could be ticketed for that role, but I can’t find anything concrete online. Either way, the good news is that this pretty much confirms Steve Phillips will be nowhere near our TV screens anytime soon, unless he’s on the Today show apologizing again or breaking into our homes to steal our TVs.

I don’t know how Ricciardi will fare on-screen. By most accounts, he had a reputation as an accessible and charismatic GM, but he did have a strange proclivity for saying really weird things. And at least one time, just straight-up lies.

So that should be interesting. Plus Ricciardi, as a former Billy Beane protege, is lumped in with Moneyball and sabermetrics even if many of the moves he made with the Blue Jays don’t exactly speak to those philosophies. So if Ricciardi goes off on some misguided tangent like Phillips used to, it will be amusing — or perhaps maddening — to watch the Murray Chasses of the world point to his words as why stats-based analysis has led baseball astray or whatever.

But while I don’t watch a whole lot of Baseball Tonight anyway now that the MLB Network has launched, here’s hoping Ricciardi turns out better as his new job than he was at his old one, and he can use the platform to bring a better understanding of advanced metrics to a wider audience.

Port St. Lucie awash in good news

Chico Harlan at the Washington Post wrote that the “Nationals’ roster seems unusually well-defined” this morning, but apparently it’s getting a lot, well, less defined this afternoon.

According to Bill Ladson of MLB.com, the Nats agreed to terms with Livan Hernandez on a Minor League deal today.

This is doubly good news for the Mets: First, it means the Mets will not acquire Livan Hernandez at any time in the foreseeable future. Not that the move had been rumored, but, well, it’s always good to have to certainty.

Second, it means there’s a good chance the Mets will face Livan Hernandez several times in 2010.

I don’t mean to discredit the 135 innings Livan scarfed down for the Mets in 2009, especially given how pitiful the Mets’ starting staff was at times last season, but Hernandez’s unique ability to stay healthy enough to make 30+ starts a year has now been entirely mitigated by his inability to retire Major League hitters in any consistent fashion.

Hernandez finished dead last among qualifying pitchers in the Majors with a 76 ERA+ in 2009 after finishing second to last with a 71 ERA+ in 2008. I defy you to find someone who has been permitted to throw so many innings so poorly since Jose Lima.

No one will convince me that Hernandez can offer more to a team than Nelson Figueroa at this point, which is good, because I don’t think anyone’s trying. Even his once-lauded batting abilities have withered with time.

Items of note

The Mets are considering trying Eddie Kunz as a starter. Interesting.

Clutch is what the Yankees need from him. Perhaps now more than ever.

Blasphemy aside, Joe Janish makes a good point about the whole Sandy Koufax-in-camp thing: I’ve read this story before.

I really don’t want to make light of Shin-Soo Choo’s terrifying military situation, but man, it really adds a lot of gravity to the 2010 Asian Games.

Santana, Wright, Klapisch, Meh

A few people have alerted to Bob Klapisch’s piece for Fox Sports last week, weighing in on confident statements from David Wright and Johan Santana suggesting that the Mets expect to win the World Series in 2010.

I appreciate the tips; I’m certainly not above taking writers to the mat when I feel the need arises and I reserve the right to call out members of the media for fallacious things they write in the future, but I’m having trouble mustering up enough to get too upset over this one.

There are plenty of fundamental arguments in the column I disagree with — most notably that no team in the league has “the guts” to take down the Phillies in 2010 and that Carlos Beltran is “hardly Winston Churchill” — but outside of the headline, there’s not much in Klapisch’s piece that’s too incendiary.

Wright and Santana said exactly what anyone should expect them to say. They’re professional athletes and they set their goals high. Sure, it might sound a little crazy given the way things went for the Mets in 2009, but “we expect to win the World Series” is a much more reasonable thing for a ballplayer to say than, “yeah, we suck. We’ll be lucky to win 80 games.”

Klapisch must realize that, and it actually comes out in his piece. He concludes by writing, “So Wright and Santana can be forgiven for the over-heated imagery. Call it the audacity of hope.”

Besides, it’s hard to kill the guy for killing the Mets because, frankly, who isn’t killing the Mets right now? Whether the front office could not or simply stubbornly chose not to overhaul the 2009 roster, they did not. The Mets return much the same team they trotted out last year, with all the same warts and without an additional starting pitcher.

Do I think there’s a chance they’ll be a whole lot better than they were last season? Of course. I have to be optimistic because I’m a Mets fan. And half the team was injured in 2009, anyway.

But for better or worse, the Mets did nothing to change the dialogue around their club this offseason and so, for the time being, they’re stuck with it. Rex Ryan has not walked through that door. This is the bed that they’ve made. They’ll lie in it until the season starts. If they win some games, the talk will change. If they lose some, it will grow louder.

The truth is, I imagine Klapisch was writing on deadline — from Tampa, no less, as per his dateline — and there wasn’t much else to write about. Until the games start up and the positional battles become a bit more clear, the only storylines to go on are these nebulous ones: leadership, confidence, delusion.

Players express confidence, columnists express doubt, and the wheels keep turning. Until the things that matter start happening, all we’ve got is talk: idle words and speculation and bandwidth.

It’s gray in New York today, cold and rainy and gloomy, and the best we’ve got to get us through our workdays are hazy columns about cloudy concepts. But things will clear up soon. We’ll have a sharper picture of what’s happening in Port St. Lucie and, in short time, a better sense of where to direct the thunder of our rage.

Culture Jammin’: 2019

I watched two movies this weekend, Blade Runner and The Running Man, which were both made in the 1980s and both set in the year 2019.

Neither 2019 reality appears entirely likely to happen, but I’ve made this helpful chart to sort the two out. Hat tip to Eric Simon at Amazin’ Avenue for the HTML tablemaker gadget.

Here is what the end of this decade will look like, according to Blade Runner and The Running Man:


Blade Runner The Running Man
What we should fear The government, corporate greed The government, sensationalist reality television
Thing it seems like we should fear but that doesn’t turn out so bad after all Replicants (“more human than human” automatons) Jesse Ventura
Flying cars Yes No
Cell phones No No
Jet packs No Yes (on Fireball)
Edward James Olmos Yes No
Manipulative, untrustworthy media Not specified Yes
Video pay phones Yes No
Computers No Yes
Advanced digital enhancement technology Yes, on a hilariously crappy TV Yes
Rebel leader Roy (a replicant) Mick Fleetwood

I’ve made no secrets of my dissatisfaction with the future here, but it’s probably best that things don’t appear to be going down either of these paths.

Still, nine years is a long time, and I wouldn’t put anything past sensationalist reality TV producers.