I actually shaved this morning, a rarity for a Monday. Later, I spoke to Brian Bassett of TheJetsBlog.com about the Jets. Here’s that:
Just Tsuyoshi being Tsuyoshi
Ladies and gentlemen, we have a Tsuyoshi Shinjo sighting.

The former Mets outfielder and longtime Nippon Ham Fighters star threw out the first pitch at Game 2 of the Japan Series yesterday. From the Japan Times:
The roar only got louder when former Nippon Ham star Shinjo made his appearance.
With his unnaturally white teeth gleaming, hair teased and dark sunglasses perched on his face, the heavily tanned former outfield maestro looked more like a movie star than a baseball player.
Yes!
Say what you will about Shinjo’s lifetime .668 Major League OPS, the dude did it with flair. That, and huge orange wristbands.
There are far more meaningful aspects to the story linked above, most notably the return of uber-phenom Yu Darvish from shoulder fatigue. After a 42-day layoff, Darvish threw 87 pitches over six innings, allowing two runs while striking out seven and walking none.
Despite never having seen them play, I’ve long been a fan of the Nippon Ham Fighters. Until recently, I thought “Nippon” meant the place they were from (which was itself perplexing, since Nippon is Japanese name for Japan) and “Ham Fighters” was their nickname, as though they were either fighters made of ham or fighters who battled ham.
Obviously that was a bit conflicting, as I wanted to root for a group of pork-based fighters but couldn’t even consider supporting any team that was waging war on ham. But it turns out they are the Fighters that are sponsored by Nippon Ham, a Japanese company that predictably sells ham.
So I guess they are fighting on behalf of ham, and so I’m cool with that. Plus they have Darvish, who appears to be incredibly good at pitching.
I know this much: The best decision I’ve made today was searching YouTube for Tsuyoshi Shinjo. It’s a veritable goldmine of awesomeness.
Die by the sword
I’m still trying to process the Jets’ loss yesterday.
Gary Myers in the Daily News points the blame at Rex Ryan, but I’m not willing to.
Going for the two-point conversion in third quarter was a questionable call. But Ryan was pretty clearly thinking that two points would put the Jets within three points of Miami, and until that quarter the game had been a defensive struggle. So I’m not going to kill him for that call.
Myers blames Ryan and special teams coordinator Mike Westhoff for kicking the ball to Ted Ginn Jr. after he had already broke one for a touchdown.
I mean, I guess. Myers points out that the Jets had never allowed two kickoff-return touchdowns in the same game in their history, as if that’s an indictment of Ryan. Doesn’t that speak to how rare a kick-return touchdown is, even from the legs of a returner as deft as Ginn?
Plus, just a few weeks ago Ryan was being praised for his swagger and bravado. I understand those things can become difficult to bear when a team starts struggling, but I also suspect that in football — unlike in baseball — they might actually help a team win.
Ryan and Westhoff had to show confidence in their kickoff coverage or risk undermining everything Ryan has said all season. Live by the sword, die by the sword.
Essentially, the Jets outplayed the Dolphins in nearly every aspect of the game and lost because of three freak plays: The kick returns and Jason Taylor’s 48-yard fumble recovery return.
Those were all indicative of poor play by the Jets: Jay Feely made a bad kick on the first return, the tackling broke down on the second, and Shonn Greene coughed the ball up for Taylor.
But none of them exposed any massive flaw in the Jets’ roster or gameplan. They were just three bad plays that happened to come in the same game.
So it strikes me that the loss might be the product of a whole lot of bad luck, more than a bad coach or a bad team.
The problem is — and again in contrast to baseball — the NFL’s 16-game schedule doesn’t allow a whole lot of wriggle room for misfortune.
So now Ryan and the Jets enter their bye week with an uphill battle on the horizon. To make the playoffs, they’ll now not only have to avoid similar bad luck against the Jaguars, Panthers, Bills and Bucs, but they’ll likely need to beat two of the Patriots, Falcons, Colts and Bengals.
The odds appear against them, for sure. But, for the first time in my life as a Jets fan, I have some confidence in Ryan’s confidence.
Items of note
Joe Janish continues his 2009 Mets analysis series with his take on Daniel Murphy. I’m still ambivalent, but I think the Mets should stick with Murphy at first at least to start the season. More on that probably later today.
Diamondbacks reliever Clay Zavada won the American Mustache Institute’s Mustache of the Year Award, and showed up to accept it. Good for all parties involved. My former roommates and great facial hair men over at Rockiescast.com did a great job tracking baseball beards all year long.
Do you not get enough of me through this blog? Click here to apply for an SNY Digital Media internship and earn the opportunity to not get paid while listening to me spew nonsense all day long. Note: Internships are only available for students who can do them for college credit.
Tim McCarver said about three or four things that made no sense at all last night. Ron Darling usually makes a lot of sense.
Sam Page does a great job running down the ways in which Omar Minaya has failed. He points to the JJ Putz trade, a good example. Not included in Sam’s excellent writeup? Omar Minaya once traded two Minor Leaguers for 41-year-old Jeff Conine.
Cat-and-mouse game
I play in a weekly pickup baseball game in Brooklyn on Saturdays.
The level is perfect. Everyone knows the rules and at least knows what he’s supposed to be doing, but no one is good enough that you feel bad when you make an embarrassing error. It’s low key.
And it’s about as Brooklyn-ish an affair as you’ll ever see. On any given Saturday, the field is littered with hipsters, lawyers, artists, bartenders, musicians, carpenters, architects, med students, whatever. It’s a big melange of just about every demographic of Brooklyn resident, with a few out-of-towners (myself now included) mixed in.
Everyone gets along, of course, because everyone there really likes baseball.
And when you play with the same general group of guys every week, you start creating mental scouting reports on all the pitchers and you get a decent sense of your own strengths and weaknesses. So there’s never a lack of bench conversation; you can just size up everyone’s game.
I’m a decent hitter. I don’t have a ton of power, but I’m reasonably patient and I rarely strike out. I can’t hit curveballs all that well, but I can usually lay off them or foul them away until I see a fastball.
I’m also pretty certain I’m the single worst defender ever to put on a baseball glove.
Anyway, that’s a long introduction to this: I was on the ball yesterday. I ripped a double down the line in my first at bat, then singled to center, then hit a couple of well-struck flyballs, one of which scored a runner from third.
I got up in the top of the 9th with the bases loaded and my team down 11-8. I had only faced the pitcher once or twice before — he’s not a guy who pitches that frequently — but I had a decent book on him. He throws a reasonably hard, but not overpowering fastball with a decent curveball that he has trouble controlling.
He started me off with a fastball off the plate that I took a huge cut at and missed. He threw another fastball off the plate that I laid off, then came inside with a fastball that I fisted (with apologies to Chip Carey) foul.
Anyway, I know for certain that I should not try to guess or think too much at the plate. It just never goes well. But despite that, I couldn’t help but think, “OK, it’s 1-2 and he’s just thrown me three straight fastballs, no way he throws another.”
But sure enough, he did. It was a perfectly hittable straight pitch right over the heart of the plate, and I froze. Such a terrible approach. So very unclutch.
The next batter grounded out to third and we lost.
Anyway, I often wonder how much the so-called chess match between pitcher and batter affects at-bats in real baseball. Obviously Major League hitters are much better than me at baseball in every imaginable way, but the pitchers are much better than that pitcher too.
I’ve heard hitters discuss it both ways. I’ve heard some guys admit to guessing one way or the other, but plenty of guys say they try to avoid thinking about the cat-and-mouse game entirely and just try to read the pitch when it comes. That can’t be entirely true, of course, because everyone knows he’s getting a fastball from Ollie Perez on a 3-1 pitch with the bases loaded. Can hitters really ever clear their mind of what could be coming next?
It sure seems like pitchers work to outthink their opponents, but can they really, or is it just a matter of their confidence and their ability to throw all their pitches for strikes? I feel like every time I’ve heard Pedro Martinez discuss pitching, especially the intricacies of at-bats, it’s clear he’s doing a tremendous amount of strategizing on the mound. But Pedro, even without throwing 97 miles per hour, has some pretty nasty stuff and pretty awesome control.
I’m certain that one time I saw John Franco strike out Barry Bonds with four straight changeups, only one off the plate, the last a swinging strike. That’s got to be a mental victory, right? Franco was a very good pitcher with a great changeup, for sure, but Bonds had to be thinking that no one would have the balls to just keep throwing him changeups over the plate.
But then Franco, it turns out, kind of owned Bonds. Including the postseason, in a very small sample of 41 plate appearances, Franco held Bonds — he of the lifetime .298/.444/.607 line — to .216/.268/.270. So maybe Bonds just couldn’t pick up the ball out of Franco’s hand, or maybe Franco was really in Bonds’ head.
Or maybe Franco was a good left-handed pitcher who was ever-so-slightly lucky against one of the greatest hitters in the history of the game.
I’m guessing these are questions we can never really answer because only the players themselves know exactly what’s going through their heads during an at-bat, players have little reason to reveal everything they were thinking during an at-bat, and quite likely every player’s approach is different.
But it’s fun to think about, especially as a way to rationalize striking out with the bases loaded and the game on the line. Ugh.
Telephone
Here’s me and Brian Bassett previewing Sunday’s Jets-Dolphins matchup:
For Halloween
Over at the Perpetual Post this week, Jillian Lovejoy Lowery and I listed our horror movie Top 5s for Halloween.
Jill includes movies like Dead Alive, an early Peter Jackson campfest that I loved, but I only listed movies that actually scared me.
I love lists, but not really ordered lists. I find it really difficult to quantify the difference between my No. 3 and No. 1 horror movie of all time, and I think if I did this list again I might make The Omen the winner.
The gift that keeps on giving
Wow. According to US Weekly, citing a former lover, A-Rod had paintings of himself as a centaur over his bed.
Wow.
Wow.
I don’t even know what to say. I didn’t think it could get funnier than the Details photoshoot, but I think it just did. A-Rod is the comedy gift that keeps on giving.
A centaur. Half-horse half-man.
You know, I’ve been brainstorming for years trying to come up with some idea for my father to follow his Awesomeist classic, Vin Diesel and Usher Riding Into Battle on a Chariot Pulled by White Tigers. Years. I just couldn’t come up with anything that could match that.
But A-Rod did: A-Rod as a centaur.
What’s most amazing, I guess, is that no one had the cojones to stop him.
Which is more damning about the nature of celebrity: That the guy thought it would be a good idea to commission a painting of himself as a centaur, or that no one tried hard enough to talk the guy out of it?
I absolutely must see it. I have to. The A-Rod as a Centaur masterpiece should be in MoMA. It reflects the human condition. It is massurrealism at its finest.
Thin ice
OK, there are two things you should read before continuing here. First, this from Jon Heyman, who suggests that “Omar Minaya is on thin ice” and “some Mets people believe the biggest reason Minaya is being kept for now is the three years and $3.5 million remaining on his contract.”
Second, this from Jeff Sackmann at the Hardball Times, which evaluates how teams fare in earning value from the draft, international free agency, trades, waivers and plain-old free agency.
By his system, the Mets ranked second from last in the Majors in 2009 in getting value from the draft, received no value from international free agents, were near the middle in trade and waiver-wire pickups, and dead last in value spent versus value returned in free agency.
Sackmann’s system is admittedly limited, plus he’s only working from 2009, when the Mets didn’t really get much value out of anybody. Still, it underscores something many Mets fans — this one included — have been saying for years: Omar Minaya does not spend his resources efficiently.
I always take offseason rumors from anonymous sources with several grains of salt, but what Heyman suggests does seem to jive with everything that has happened in the Mets’ front office and every rumor we’ve heard.
And if it’s really true, the Mets should fire Omar Minaya right now.
Look: Either you have confidence in a GM to build your team for the upcoming season and the future or you don’t. “Putting the heat on him,” as has been suggested, is about the worst possible approach. That only further pushes Minaya toward moves of desperation, the type made to save his job but not necessarily to forward the franchise.
That’s a bad thing. That’s the opposite of progress. That’s regress.
What’s worse, keeping the guy around just because he’s owed more money is not only a pitiful misunderstanding of sunk-cost economics, but a massively ironic one. If — as Sackmann shows — Omar Minaya does not spend money efficiently, then why continue paying him to waste your money just because you owe him a tiny fraction of your overall budget?
If the Mets think Minaya is the guy to run the Mets for the long haul, they should make that abundantly clear to everyone and make sure no one in their front office is leaking out any suspicions to the contrary.
After all, Minaya — maybe as much as any GM in baseball — is conscious of public perception. Remember, this is the guy who couldn’t go out for bagels without hearing about how he should fix the bullpen.
And if the Mets are unwilling to make a long-term commitment to Minaya as a general manager, there’s no sense in making a short-term commitment.
There might be some advantage to having a manager know he’s on the hot seat, because it might compel him to shake things up and think of new and better ways to get the team to win. It’s the manager’s job to try to win immediately.
But that’s not the case with the GM. The GM must be held responsible for the present and the future. He needs to focus on building a sustainable winner, not a patchwork club wearing thin on resources.
Putting the GM on the hot seat will only force him to make myopic decisions, precisely the type that got the Mets into this mess in the first place.
Food for thought
I was just discussing autographs with two co-workers. I don’t really understand the point of autographs and I never have, because I don’t understand why I should want an example of someone’s handwriting just because they are famous.
Cerrone pointed out that, in a lot of cases, people just use autographs to prove that they met someone, and he’s probably right. But I don’t understand why I should have to prove that one time I sat next to Bill Murray at a Mets game (I did, hilarious experience) or saw Heather Graham in a restaurant (quite pleasant). You can feel free to not believe me; what do I care? I know it happened.
The conversation meandered and eventually became a discussion of what living current or former Met we would most like to have lunch with.
I said Kevin Mitchell. Say what you will about the guy, it sounds as though he’s had a pretty interesting life, in baseball and otherwise. Plus he seems like a guy who’d give it to you straight, so maybe I could finally find out the truth about the cat story.
Also, he’s got to be the only guy to ever injure himself eating a donut. That sort of makes him my hero by default.
And furthermore, he’s the subject of my single favorite baseball card of all-time, the 1987 Topps one showed here. There are still about 30 of those — no exaggeration — in a binder in my parents’ basement.
Anyone have any better ideas? Is there a Met that would make for a more interesting lunch date than Kevin Mitchell?