Should a band always play its biggest hit?

Modest Mouse put on a good show last night at Governor’s Ball. I’m not a huge fan of the band; I’ve got nothing against them, but I don’t own any of their albums. And though I recognized several of their songs when they played them, I couldn’t readily identify most of them as Modest Mouse songs until last night. They seemed worth seeing live based on what I knew of their catalog and reputation, but they were hardly the draw that got me to the all-day festival.

My wife, for what it’s worth, really likes the song “Float On,” the band’s most recognizable hit and only No. 1 single on any chart in its career thus far. Last night they did not play it, wrapping up instead with “Missed the Boat,” a very nice song.

But this isn’t really about Modest Mouse. That band is only a recent example used here to beg the question: Should a band always play its biggest hit at concerts?

On one hand, it hardly seems rock-and-roll to yield to the whims of the Billboard charts to indulge those in attendance not familiar with the bulk of your repertoire. Presumably the hardcore fans prefer the deeper cuts that they haven’t seen performed countless times on late-night talk shows by now, and a band should be loyal to those most loyal to it.

On the other, it does seem either self-conscious or ungracious to eschew a song, no matter how sick of it you are, if it’s the one that brought you mainstream success. The Flaming Lips, for example, have played “She Don’t Use Jelly” at every one of their concerts I’ve attended — at least once prefacing it with a note about how that song’s success provided the resources they needed to do all the awesomely strange projects and performances they’ve endeavored since.

So there’s the rub: Playing the song might amount to giving in to the masses when the most rock-band thing to do is say, “f— the masses, we’ll play what we want.” But if not for those masses’ appreciation of the song, you’re probably not playing for nearly as large a crowd.

[poll id=”112″]

Is Cole Hamels true SABR?

“When I was young and dumb and naïve,” Hamels said, he paid attention to the won-loss record, “because everyone talks about a 20-game winner, and it makes you feel like you’re the greatest pitcher ever until you start seeing and experiencing it how wins aren’t really decided by a pitcher. They’re decided by your team.”

Zach Berman, N.Y. Times.

What the…? That’s not old-school baseball! You know what’s old-school baseball? Pitching to the score, or at least convincing people that you are.

Also very old-school baseball:

Also worth noting: Hamels is awesome at baseball, old-school or otherwise. I caught myself gaping at his baseball-reference page the other day. Someone’s going to give ol’ Cole a hell of a lot of money this offseason, which should mean all sorts of new shoes and dog-backpacks and glamor shots.

Hat tip to Tom Boorstein.

Wasn’t watching

I went to Governor’s Ball on Randall’s Island last night (more on that to follow, possibly) and missed the finale of this edition of the Subway Series. From the reaction, it seems many fans questioned Terry Collins’ decision to use Miguel Batista against Robinson Cano with Tim Byrdak available in the short-staffed bullpen. Cano homered, the Mets lost and Byrdak, for once, did not pitch. So that’s bad.

That the loss came to the Yankees, or that there was all sorts of posturing before and after the series and a live chicken somehow involved, doesn’t mean all that much. The Mets are 39-34 on the year and still very much in the hunt for one of the two Wild Card spots. They need to win as many games as possible, obviously. Going 1-5 against the Yankees is bad mostly because they lost four more of those games than they won.

The good news is that the team called up Justin Hampson today, which will give them a full bullpen and a second lefty. Hampson’s been good for Buffalo this year, sporting a 2.13 ERA and striking out 42 batters in 42 1/3 innings.

Given the way Collins relies on platoon matchups and the frequency with which Byrdak has been used, there’s no harm in giving Hampson a shot. Josh Edgin has struggled of late in Triple-A, plus Hampson was good in his 84-inning tenure with the Padres from 2007-2008.

Hampson’s 32 so he’s not exactly a sexy prospect, but it’s probably at least worth noting that Byrdak was 33 when he broke into the Majors for good. Randy Choate only had one full season on his resume when he re-emerged as a big-league LOOGY at 33 in 2009. Pedro Feliciano pitched in Japan in 2005 before he became the Mets’ near-everyday lefty at 29 in 2006, etc. Sometimes these guys show up from off-the-radar and contribute. Maybe Hampson can, too.

The roster still looks heavy on slap-hitting middle infielders, though.

Roster stuff happening

The Mets activated Ronny Cedeno from the disabled list today and sent Elvin Ramirez back to Buffalo. If you’re playing at home, that means the Mets are short on relievers and very long on light-hitting middle infielders.

Including Daniel Murphy, the Mets have five guys who primarily play second base or shortstop on the active roster tonight. Of them, the best hitter this year (in a tiny sample) has been Omar Quintanilla, followed by Cedeno, Valdespin, Murphy and Turner.

Ramon Ramirez is set for a rehab outing in Triple-A tonight. Presumably if that goes well, he’ll join the club in short order and replace one of the multitudes of middle infielders. Another will likely go when Ruben Tejada gets back, as Tejada, too, is rehabbing in Buffalo.

There seems to be some clamor from Mets fans these days about starting Valdespin every day at second over Murphy based on Valdespin’s performance in his first 60 Major League plate appearances. If you’re making the case based on defense, that’s one thing. If you’re saying Valdespin’s a better hitter than Murphy, you’re wrong.

Say this out loud so you don’t forget it: Jordany Valdespin is not a better hitter than Daniel Murphy. Really emphasize every syllable: Jordany Valdespin is not a better hitter than Daniel Murphy. Now say it as slowly as you can, and let the sounds all wash around your mouth: Jordany Valdespin is not a better hitter than Daniel Murphy.

Valdespin has had a few big hits and flashed some power. He has a .250 on-base percentage. He has walked once in the Majors and only 34 times in 841 plate appearances, the type of aggressiveness likely to be exploited by Major League pitchers. His career Triple-A stats translate to a .242/.269/.343 Major League line in a neutral park. His best Minor League stretch — 404 at-bats in Double-A Binghamton in 2011 — translates to .232/.268/.361 rates.

Murphy, meanwhile, has nearly 1,500 plate appearances on his resume to show he’s a credible Major League hitter. He’s had a rough month and he doesn’t have a home run yet. I know those things. But he’s got a lifetime .288/.337/.421 line and he’s 27. If he’s healthy, he will hit.

Maybe Murphy’s hurt or got some awful case of the yips or something and will never hit like Daniel Murphy again, and maybe something suddenly clicks for Valdespin soon and he starts getting on base like a capable Major League position player should, but I would guess the chances of either happening soon are slim and the chances of both happening are minuscule.

Some Royals fans also didn’t get Beltran, baseball

For the Kansas City Star, Sam Mellinger writes an excellent feature about Carlos Beltran upon the outfielder’s return to Kauffman Stadium. Go read it.

The first comment:

What I remember most about Carlos is is selfish moody play especially on the tough days when the ream was getting shut out he would go a careless 0 for 4. Then when the team was romping some one he was 5 for 5. We didn’t win with him so why wish we had the selfish bum??

Can that possibly be real and not satire? It’s almost too perfect.

Staten Island renting goats

On a sweltering afternoon on Staten Island, the New York City parks department unveiled its latest weapon in the war on phragmites, an invasive weed that chokes the shoreline: goats. Twenty Anglo-Nubians, to be exact. With names like Mozart, Haydn and Van Goat, and with floppy ears and plaintive bleats, they did not seem fearsome. But on Thursday they were already munching inexorably through the long pale leaves in the first phase of a wetland restoration at what will soon be Freshkills Park.

Known for their unending, indiscriminate appetites, the goats are being rented by the city for the next six weeks from a farmer in the Hudson Valley. Parks officials are counting on the goats to clear the phragmites across two acres of wetlands that will eventually be cultivated with native grasses like spartina and black needle rush. The hope is that the goats will weaken the phragmites, setting the stage for another series of assaults on their stubborn rhizomes — applying herbicide, scarifying the earth and laying down sand….

“I’m not a big fan of goats,” said Bernd Blossey, an associate professor of natural resources at Cornell University.

Lisa Foderaro, N.Y. Times.

Unlike natural-resources professor Bernd Blossey, I am a big fan of goats. Look at this goat:

Here’s something you might not know about goats: In addition to being obviously awesome and hilarious, goats are one of the domestic species that most quickly adapts to feral life. The Wikipedia says that among domestic animals, only cats can revert to the wild as swiftly as goats. In fact, that goat photo you see above is a feral goat in Aruba. Australia, apparently, has a big-time feral goat problem.

So while I mean no offense to Staten Islanders here, and while in principle the idea to turn that massive Staten Island landfill into something called Freshkills Park seems like a noble one, I’m definitely, definitely rooting for a mishap wherein several of the goats get loose, then live off the fat of the garbage, mate, and ultimately wrest Staten Island from the hands of the Wu-Tang Clan.

The Garbage Goats of Staten Island, running loose on the street, butting heads with locals, eating up prized shrubberies, saying “meh.”

Also, Van Goat is the best name for a goat.

Shadow hero

It was Edgardo Alfonzo that got me.

During the Mets’ All-Time Team event Sunday night –- the one that airs tonight at 7 p.m. on SNY, I should say -– Gary Cohen called Alfonzo the team’s “shadow hero,” the guy who always seemed to draw the walk that set up the big hit or drive in the tying run that led to the winning run in the comeback.

And in fact, at the preceding reception and all others I’ve attended like it, most Mets heroes of yesteryear hold court among gleeful fans, smile for photos, point at each other fraternally and generally carry on with the type of understandable bravado developed from a post-baseball life spent encircled by admirers harping on their every word. But Alfonzo, the best second baseman in Mets’ history and an important part of what Sports Illustrated deemed “The Best Infield Ever” — he of over 1,500 hits and an .891 career postseason OPS and countless great games and big moments in orange and blue — seems content to stand or sit in some corner, nursing a drink and picking from the passed hors d’oeuvres like my wife and I do at work-friend weddings where we hardly know anyone.

Thinking about that — and thinking about Alfonzo — got me choked up on my short walk home from the event. I even shed a couple of tears on 89th St., my first since Shea Stadium closed in 2008.

Alfonzo’s only the medium, of course. Most memories don’t come neatly packaged or sharply edited like the baseball highlights shown at Sunday’s event, and there’s no archive we can rely on to summon them when we need them — no play or pause or rewind buttons on our consciousness. And considering Alfonzo, trying to recall his playing days and wondering what it was (and is) about him that pushes him to the margins at these things, inevitably brought back a flood of mostly indistinct memories of my late brother.

Somewhere in my head there’s Chris looking at the roster sometime in the summer of 1995, noticing for the first time that there’s a player on the Mets younger than him and lamenting his fading chances of ever making the Majors. And there’s his voice on the phone from someplace in Texas, providing a recap in exhaustive detail of the dizzy-bat race that won him the broken bat with which Edgardo’s brother Edgar struck his 999th career Minor League hit -– Chris delighting at once in his dizzy-bat victory, the coincidental nature of the prize, and the remarkable fact that Edgardo Alfonzo had a brother named Edgar. And then for just a moment I can see, in crystal-clear high definition, my brother’s grinning face under a Mets hat and backed by the blue seats at Shea, saying, “Fonzie!”

It’s the fleeting feeling of what he was like, and what it was like to hang out with him and b.s. about baseball with him, and it’s the best feeling. And then, when I can’t get it back, it’s the worst.

People say the holidays are the toughest time for missing lost loved ones, but that’s not the case for me. For me it’s right around now, in the crushing New York summer, when school is out and network sitcoms are on hiatus and there’s not much to mark the passing of time besides the steady crawl and awesome enormity of baseball’s regular season. I want to call my brother and talk about it but I can’t.

Then I see Fonzie in the corner and I feel compelled to grab him, hug him, pull him to the center of the room and say, “this guy, here! Does no one here remember how awesome he was? He was our favorite!”

But it would be weird, and it wouldn’t change a damn thing. It thrills me to see Alfonzo in the spotlight at events like Sunday’s because he deserves it, and because it seems like some odd form of validation for my brother’s appreciation of Alfonzo from his rookie year. Then I cry on the walk home because of the awful irony, because no recognition or highlight reel or ceremony can draw my own hero from the shadow for more than a moment.

The Mets, you know, annually seek meaningful games in September. The phrase gets bandied about a bunch, in seriousness and silliness. Naturally, it refers on face to games that impact the pennant race. But really, is any baseball game meaningful? Or is every baseball game meaningful, in May of ’95 and September of ’99 and August of ’03 and in the sticky summer heat at Citi Field last night?

What is any baseball player or baseball itself but a shadow hero behind our appreciation of beauty and greatness and chance, our understanding of joy and community and brotherhood and love? And why would anyone aspire to more?