Do you smell what The Rock is fearing?

Fear can be a useful tool for an individual animal. But it’s even more useful for one animal to be able to communicate its alarm — quickly — to others of its kind. Many lower animals seem to rely on smell to accomplish this, but surprisingly little is known of the substances used, or how they are produced or perceived.

The best-known alarm signals are used by bees and ants. The European honeybee releases a mixture of compounds after a sting. A major component is a molecule called isopentyl acetate, which rouses alarm in other honeybees. “Carpenter ants release compounds called formic acid and n-undecane to signal danger to their fellows,” Dr. Jesuthasan said. “Ants that sense these chemicals stop moving, swing their antennae and then begin moving quickly. If an enemy is spotted, they become aggressive. The exact response depends on the ratio of the chemicals.”

Sea urchins release substances when their bodies are crushed that cause other sea urchins to flee. Similar responses have been shown in marine snails, tunicates and tadpoles. But the chemical nature of the signals is not known, Dr. Jesuthasan added.

Amanda Schaffer, N.Y. Times.

You might not expect this article about the response of zebra fish to the presence of sugar molecules called chondroitins to be very interesting, but you’d be wrong. Also, why would I link it if it wasn’t interesting? And furthermore, someone remind me about Schreckstoff the next time I’m looking for a band name.

I got hung up on the evolutionary aspect of it: How could it benefit a dying sea urchin to warn other nearby sea urchins? Also, how could something like that develop? Without any expertise in the subject whatsoever, it seems more likely to me that the chemicals involved are some the creatures naturally produce while injured (or naturally produce while healthy that spread into the water after injuries), and the species have developed the obviously beneficial ability to sense it and escape danger.

The Wikipedia page for Schreckstoff, which specifically deals with the chemical produced by minnows, seems to suggest a similar conclusion. Though it presents multiple hypotheses for the evolution of the stuff, most of them have some pretty significant holes. The one that appears to make the most sense is that Schreckstoff has a function in the minnows’ immune system, and the other minnows (and some predators) are simply taking advantage of their ability to sense when it is released.

So there’s that.

Reinforcements coming

OK, so it looks like while I was gone, the Mets won some games and lost some games. R.A. Dickey and Johan Santana were awesome, the defense was bad and the bullpen was worse. So… status quo.

Josh Thole should return to the team in time for Friday’s game, which should provide a offensive upgrade over the combination of Mike Nickeas and Rob Johnson. When the Mets aren’t hitting for much power — as they didn’t until last week — guys like Thole with a knack for getting on base help maintain rallies, something that (obviously) becomes far more difficult to do when the lineup is freckled with out machines.

The Mets apparently have been hitting for some power, which is nice. They’ve got 11 home runs in their last seven games after hitting only 25 in their first 44. So that’s good. They don’t have a lot of home-run hitters in their regular lineup (especially if Ike Davis is struggling and/or not in the regular lineup), but it will be good when a few more guys start running into a few more. Since the Mets already get on base pretty well, an uptick in power would give the Mets one of the top offenses in the National League.

Elvin Ramirez will accompany Thole to New York and (presumably) join the team’s beleaguered bullpen. Ramirez has been straight-up dominant in Triple-A to the tune of 19 strikeouts, no earned runs, five hits and one walk in 14 2/3 innings. And calling on him now, given the struggles of the Mets’ bullpen, seems like a no-brainer.

But consider me something of an Elvin Ramirez skeptic, if there are such things: Outside of these last 14 2/3 innings, Ramirez has always walked too many guys at every level. Even in the early part of this season at Double-A, Ramirez walked seven batters in 13 frames. Maybe his improved control this year is something real — perhaps the product of a mechanical adjustment made while rehabbing the surgery that cost him all of 2011. Or maybe it’s something that has just happened over 14 2/3 innings, and… well, there’s a song about 14 2/3 innings.

In an ideal situation, the Mets’ bullpen would be pitching great and the club would have more time to figure out if this improved Ramirez is the real Ramirez. But Mets relievers have a 5.45 ERA and Ramirez had not allowed a run in 14 2/3 Triple-A innings.

Taco Bell items of note

If I made separate posts out of all the Taco Bell developments I haven’t covered in the last week, there’d be no room for anything else in this blog. There’s still some more to come (possibly tomorrow), but here are several Taco Bell items of note.

Taco Bell experiments with Mountain Dew A.M.: Mountain Dew A.M., it turns out, is Mountain Dew mixed with orange juice. That sounds like something I might have found completely awesome when I was 7, or, alternately, like something I would have created myself (at that same age) if I had access to a soda fountain and some orange juice.

At 31, though, a Mountain Dew-O.J. hybrid just doesn’t sound very appealing. Or even mildly appealing. I don’t drink many sugary beverages though, so I’m probably not the target Mountain Dew audience. Also, as the linked post points out, “Dewdriver” and “Morning Dew” are much better names for the same thing.

Maybe it’s so you get caffeine in your Taco Bell orange juice? I’d rather have coffee, though. Back when I worked at the deli — before I drank coffee, I guess — I used to sometimes empty a can of Red Bull over ice in one of those big styrofoam deli cups and fill up the rest with unsweetened Iced Tea. The tea made the Red Bull more tolerable and the Red Bull made my hangover more tolerable.

Via Greg.

Make your own Crunchwrap Supreme: Sarah Sprague passed along this recipe for a homemade Crunchwrap Supreme. If you lack access to Taco Bell this is probably extraordinarily useful.

Taco tantrum happens: A man named Michael Smith in Huber Heights, Ohio, got so mad that his local Taco Bell forgot one of the tacos he ordered that he drove back to the drive-thru, exchanged words with employees, then drove his truck into the building. I like to imagine he was like, “I’ll show you a drive-thru!” Or something like that.

Alex, who passed this along, asked what my worst-ever reaction to a screwed-up Taco Bell order is. I’m not sure I have many, except, you know, driving back and telling them they screwed up my order. And I don’t even do that very often. All things considered, I’m a pretty mild-mannered guy about stuff like that, and the last thing I want to do is piss off the people who provide me Taco Bell. After too many screwed-up orders I stopped going to one of the three Taco Bells near my parents’ house, but that’s pretty much my only recourse.

In my years of Taco Bell-eating, I’ve really only seen one massive overreaction at the drive-thru. I detailed that here.

– I eat Firstmeal: Some of you may accuse me of burying the lead here, but I prefer to think of this post as swelling toward a climactic moment, like a Broadway play or something. Only this one’s anti-climactic because so is Firstmeal.

It turns out Phoenix is a Firstmeal location, so before we left that city for the Grand Canyon, I tried the Bacon and Egg Burrito, the Johnsonville Sausage and Egg Wrap, a Cinnabon Delight and a piece of hash brown. I figured the Johnsonville Sausage and Egg Wrap for a breakfast version of the Crunchwrap Supreme, but it is much smaller:

The Bacon and Egg Burrito seemed to feature the same underwhelming Taco Bell bacon we’ve encountered before, with some not particularly notable fast-food eggs and cheese. Once I added Fire Sauce it tasted like Fire Sauce, but that was pretty decidedly the best thing in there.

The Johnsonville deal was, honestly, a pretty poor advertisement for Johnsonville. The sausage patty inside was grey and rubbery. Uninspiring. I suppose it was wrapped up like a Crunchwrap Supreme to fit the full, round sausage patty, but it definitely could have benefited from a taco shell or some Crunchy Red Strips in there.

Actually, that goes for everything I tried at Taco Bell breakfast: Less breakfast, more Taco Bell. The only thing that distinguished it from any other fast food place’s breakfast is that many of the items are served in tortillas. None of them are even served in tacos! Plus, you’ve got all that Lava Sauce sitting right there and there’s just no way you’re going to convince me that’s not awesome on breakfast foods. Now put it on a Volcano Breakfast Burrito.

Hopefully that’s part of Phase 2.

The Cinnabon things are pretty delicious as they are filled with Cinnabon goo. The hash brown was notably good by fast-food hash brown standards.

And we’re back

This world, he thinks, contains only one masterpiece, and that is itself.

– David Mitchell, The Thousand Autumns of Jacob de Zoet.

I’m back at my desk. 48 hours ago, I was in the midst of a roughly eight-mile walk along the South Rim of the Grand Canyon. It is a beautiful thing. It is not something I can readily describe, and posting any of the few iPhone photos I took would be a hilarious injustice. More posts coming as soon as I unbury myself from the pile of work that built up in my absence.

From the mailbag: Foodstuff

Chris Wilcox asks:

If you had a sandwich named after you at your favorite deli, what ingredients would you want on that sandwich? I was thinking about this question for myself recently (smoked turkey, bacon, tomatoes, jalapenos, and chipotle mayo on potato bread, in case you were wondering) and thought I’d pose this question to a true Sandwich Expert to get his take on the issue.

We tackled this (also from Chris) on the podcast, but here’s the text version of my part of that: I had a sandwich named after me at the deli where I worked, DeBono’s in Rockville Centre, N.Y. And though I’m not sure it’s still on the menu, I imagine if you go in there and ask the right person for a Berg’s Pepper Barge, they’ll make you one — assuming they’ve got pepper ham in stock, which isn’t always a lock.

Berg’s Pepper Barge was the product of some deli-man lunchtime experimentation, with input from my old boss Jay. It was pretty simple: Pepper ham, pepper turkey and DeBono’s fresh mozzarella, with olive oil, balsamic vinegar and optional roasted red peppers. Good stuff. If I were putting it together now I’d probably throw on some hot pickled peppers for a little more spice and crunch, but I think it was a noble effort for a 20-year-old kid creating sandwiches for love.

What sandwich would I want named for me at a deli today? Good question. All my favorite delis growing up were run by Italians or Germans, and it so happen that my mom’s Italian and my dad is half-German (also half-Scottish, but I’d prefer not to incorporate Scottish food on any sandwich named for me). So I’d probably want to experiment with a combination of Italian and German deli staples to come up with some deli sandwich that somehow embodies my deli heritage. So like, I don’t know, something with black forest ham and soppressata? I don’t know. Much like Giuseppe Franco, I don’t want to put my name on an inferior product, so I’d like to experiment first.

As for a non-deli sandwich, I’d be fine with that Chicken-Fried Steak sandwich with bacon, country gravy and jalapenos from the first Sandwich Show being sold as “The Ted Berg” somewhere. Get on it, humanity.

Worth noting: Brett’s working on the second episode of the Sandwich Show now and it should be done within a couple of weeks. If it’s anywhere near as good as the sandwich it produced, it’s going to be outrageously awesome. I can’t stop thinking about the sandwich. I got professional help.

Andrew writes:

What are your thoughts about sandwich thins? These, for example.

Well they’re not Plan A, but I’ve had them and they’re not terrible. I have enjoyed the linked sandwich thins while dieting in the past. Now that I’m married I’m less likely to go on late-night bread-eating binges (grilled cheese, peanut butter and jelly, etc.), so I can keep bread in the house and try to trim down all at the same time. Plus the bread my wife likes isn’t much worse for you than the sandwich thins, so I go with that.

Patrick writes:

Why is it that the Mexi-Melt is given little to no love. It’s the most under appreciated Taco Bell menu item if not fast food menu item of all time. Explain this?

Wait, who doesn’t love the Mexi-Melt? It certainly gets its fair share of respect around these parts, and I know it’s a pretty standard go-to among several of my Taco Bell eating friends. But if it isn’t in other circles, I suspect it might have something to do with cost efficiency. The MexiMelt is generally 20-30 cents more expensive than a soft taco, depending on where you are, and for that you’re getting no more meat or tortilla, less lettuce, fiesta salsa (which I opt out of anyway) and only slightly more cheese.

The difference, obviously, is that the MexiMelt is all wrapped up and melted together, and that’s something I think is worth paying a premium for. But I’ve a distinguishing Taco Bell palate and I’m willing to lay out big cash for choice American-adapted Mexican-inspired fast-food delicacies.

From the mailbag: Wright, Beltran

Ceetar writes:

You looked up streaks The Captain has had before that were this good, but has this year now surpassed those in length?

He means David Wright, for what it’s worth. And yes, it has. In a couple of earlier posts, I looked up whether Wright had any hot stretches in any of his disappointing seasons from 2009-2011 that, if isolated by arbitrary endpoints, match the production he has put up to open the 2012 season. There were 33- and 38-game stretches that matched this hot start, but by my best digging on the baseball-reference gamelogs, I can’t isolate a 41-game stretch from any of those years in which Wright was this good for this long — at least if you consider Wright’s lack of strikeouts along with his hilarious production.

In fact, the last time I can find that Wright was this hot was back in his MVP-caliber 2007 campaign, when he posted a .379/.500/.662 mark from the second game of a July 28 doubleheader through Sept. 12. And though Wright hit 10 home runs over that stretch and it was less fueled by batting average in balls in play, given the distinctions in hitting environments and league-wide offensive standards it seems reasonable to contend that an 1.128 OPS today is at least impressive as a 1.162 OPS in 2007 (to boot: Carlos Beltran’s .904 OPS with the Mets in 2011 produced a 152 park- and league-adjusted OPS+ whereas his me-first .982 OPS in 2006 yielded a 150 in the same stat).

Which is to say something you may have noticed: Wright’s first 41 games in 2012 represent about the best we’ve seen of the man. And it is, you may also have noticed, pretty spectacular.

As for calling Wright “The Captain,” this is confusing for a bunch of reasons. For one, to me “The Captain” will always refer to The Captain Dog (more frequently known simply as “Captain” or “T. Captain Dog”) my late, lovably dumb, giant-headed Scottish Terrier. Alternately, it might also refer to Captain Morgan or Kirk Nieuwenhuis.

Should the Mets name Wright their captain? I guess? If someone could tell me anything specific that a baseball-team captain does that David Wright doesn’t already do, I might be more adamant about it. He gets to wear a little “C” on his jersey? Symbolic gestures are nice, but I suspect the best way to indicate to Wright and Mets fans that the team is committed to him as a leader and player is to pony up for a long-term extension, which seems pretty likely anyway.

Tyrion writes:

Carlos Beltran leading the league in homers while not an upcoming free agent, how does this selfishly benefit him?

Beltran has figured it out, Tyrion. He knows that we know he’s only playing for his next contract, so he’s playing really well in a non-contract year as misdirection so it doesn’t seem suspicious when he plays really well in a contract year. He pulled the same act with the Mets in 2006, 2007, 2008, the first half of 2009, and the last month of 2010. It’s utterly depraved.

From the mailbag: Baxter, Hamels, Nieuwenhuis

The Mets-heavy edition. Here we go.

Scott writes:

What’s your opinion on how the Mets should utilize Mike Baxter at least for the immediate future?

It has been good to see Baxter get some starts over the past week, and he’s earned some more. Plus, though Baxter has seen very few opportunities against left-handed pitchers in 2012, he didn’t really demonstrate much of a platoon split in the Minors. So if Baxter is on the bench for a game, I might rather see him left in to face a lefty specialist in a pinch-hitting spot than see him pulled for one of the Mets’ lesser-hitting righty bench bats (i.e. anyone but Scott Hairston).

We talked about this some on the podcast that just rolled out: Jason Bay’s probably going to play every day when he returns, at least to start. There are a bunch of reasons for this, some better than others. His contract and veteran status don’t seem like good reasons to play him every day, but they do seem like likely factors. One last effort to get him straightened out so the Mets can part ways with that contract without eating the whole thing does seem like a decent reason.

But if and when Bay struggles against righties — as he did in 2011 and the first couple of weeks of 2012 — the Mets will have to face platooning Bay if they want to win as many games as possible. They’ve got three lefty-hitting outfielders (with varying amounts of upside) who are under team control way longer than Bay and who could feasibly play some role on future Mets contenders. Baxter, older and less-heralded than Kirk Nieuwenhuis and Lucas Duda, is probably the lowest priority for regular at-bats. But he has also performed the best in his tiny sample in 2012.

Unless Baxter is somehow one of the top five hitters in the Majors he’s not going to keep hitting at this clip, obviously. But 27-year-olds with histories of good Minor League hitting do sometimes come out of the woodwork to become productive Major League regulars, so it doesn’t seem imprudent to give Baxter as many opportunities as possible to prove himself. It’ll just be tough to do that, given how many lefties the Mets have in their lineup and how many seem to also merit regular at-bats. The task becomes easier if the Mets do decide to demote Ike Davis.

Paul writes:

Hey Matt,

Big fan of the blog. I was wondering do you think the mets should trade David Wright? and what sort of prospecs could they get in a deal for wright? chipper jonas is retiring, would the Braves be willing to give3 up some of their arms in a package for Wright?

Hey Paul: You misspelled “traid.”

Speaking of which, C. Hamels writes:

If you could traid Val Pascucci straight up for me, would you pull the trigger?

Well, yeah. C’mon now. I hope it’s clear by now that I realize Cole Hamels is about as awesome at pitching as he is at posing for embarrassing photos. Plus, as much as I dislike the Phillies, I’m rooting for Pascucci to get more Major League chances anywhere, and the Phillies could use a bat right about now. Ty Wigginton, of the .639 OPS and the not-very-good defense, is the righty half of their first-base platoon. You’re telling me Pascucci can’t outproduce that?

The Mets could use a starting pitcher, the Phillies could use a power bat and Pascucci could use another crack at big-league pitching. It just makes sense. GET IT DONE SANDY.

Steve asks:

Kirk Nieuwenhuis (spelled it without looking it up, how’d I do?) has been striking out in 30% of his at bats. You think he’ll still turn out to be a solid regular?

Nieuwenhuis’ 30.3 percent strikeout rate is nothing extraordinary by his standards; he struck out in 27.4 percent of his plate appearances in Triple-A. He will likely have to improve that if he aims to become a solid regular.

The outstanding baseball-reference play index for whatever reason doesn’t seem to search by strikeout percentage, but to date there have been only 17 full seasons in Major League history in which a hitter suffered an at-bat to strikeout rate as low as Nieuwenhuis’ current 2.9 with an OPS+ above 100 (i.e. league average). Most of them are by three-true-outcomes type mashers: Three by Jack Cust, two by Jim Thome, two by Mark Reynolds, two by Rob Deer, two by Adam Dunn, etc.

Of course, there’s probably some selection bias in play. Ten of those 17 seasons have come since 2006, so maybe, as the Major Leagues warm to the idea that strikeouts aren’t so awful, we’ll see more guys succeed despite extremely high strikeout totals. And maybe, somehow, Nieuwenhuis is one of those guys.

But since Nieuwenhuis is currently the benefactor of the Majors’ second-highest batting average on balls in play, it seems like he’ll have to put more balls in play to keep his batting average and on-base percentage up when that normalizes a bit. But he’s 24 and these are only his first 144 Major League at-bats, so there’s hope yet.