Am I taking crazy pills?

All during the Jets-Bills’ game yesterday and now again around the Internet on Monday morning I keep reading about how Gang Green’s run game didn’t show up. Huh? I’m looking at the box score, and it says the Jets ran the ball 23 times for 138 yards — six yards per carry.

That’s far and away the Jets’ best single-game per-carry average on the season, which makes sense given the way their offensive line was manhandling the Bills’ defensive front. All game long Mark Sanchez, despite plenty of time to throw, is dangerously mixing aggressiveness with inaccuracy. And yet the Jets still pass the ball nearly twice as often as they run it.

So much for ground and pound, eh?

Whatever. They won the game. It shouldn’t have been nearly so exciting, though. And it’s frustrating because when the line’s playing as well as it did yesterday, in Shonn Greene and Joe McKnight you can start to see the vague suggestion of an awesome and very potent thunder-and-lightning type backfield platoon that could combine with the Jets’ defense to chew up game clock and win lots of football games.

Only then, just when you think it’s about to start happening, for some reason Sanchez is lined up in the shotgun with an empty backfield.

I know Brian Schottenheimer has become sort of a great Jets-fan bugaboo, and I’m participating. He’s far from the team’s only problem. Until the last drive, Sanchez played terribly yesterday. His touchdown-heavy statline bails him out, but it was not a good game.

What I’m thankful for

It’s Thanksgiving, as you probably know. And I am of course thankful for all the awesome things I should be thankful for: My friends and family, my job, the food I’m about to eat, shelter, indoor plumbing, football, etc.

But in addition to those staples, here are three things I’m thankful for this year:

Change I can believe in: Fans are understandably down on the Mets. They’re coming off their third straight losing season, their owners are mired in a very public financial mess, and they might be on the brink of losing to free agency one of the brightest stars the franchise has produced in decades. And that all sucks.

But it’s comforting to know — or to be able to believe, at least — that the Mets’ current front office seems both capable of and dedicated to making the best possible baseball decisions to turn the club into a regular winner. It’s going to take time, of course. And I understand if you don’t believe me — the current front office has been so hamstrung by the decisions of the last one that it hasn’t yet had a lot of flexibility to show what it will do with what should be a big-market payroll. That’s a discussion for another day, though.

Point is, I haven’t yet lost faith in Sandy Alderson and the SABRos, and for that I’m thankful. Maybe there’s some blinders-on optimism in play here, but that’s fine by me: It’s nice to enjoy a sunny outlook about your favorite team’s future for once, and I’ll seize this opportunity as long as I can. If and when they start making short-sighted, reactionary, terrible moves, I’ll lament them. For now, I’m going to celebrate that somewhere in the eye of the ferocious hellstorm of nonsense whirling around the team stand (or appear to stand) a couple of calm, reasonable dudes making shrewd decisions geared toward building a perennial contender.

Banh mi sandwiches: How great are banh mi sandwiches? I’ve had three since I moved back to the city. They’re not readily available in Westchester — or at least not that I could find. So I’ve set out on a quest to find a Hall of Fame-caliber banh mi, and I’m not going to stop until you read that glowing review here on this site.

There’s a combination of flavors and textures in the banh mi that’s not found in most sandwiches traditionally produced by Western cultures. It’s the exquisite product of cultural interchange: Southeast Asian flavors with delicious, crusty French bread, and you just know if you trace back the history there’s all sorts of unspeakable colonial awfulness involved (kind of like Thanksgiving, really) but if you’re staring at the sandwich you can overlook it all for a second and revel in the years-later byproduct of imperialism.

Whoa, that got heavy. I want to go back to talking about the sandwich: The taste of a good banh mi floats around your mouth like a spicy, vinegary butterfly. It’s eminently filling, but somehow refreshing — a big, delicious sandwich that leaves you feeling like maybe you ate something healthy for once. I think that’s the cilantro. We should brush our teeth with cilantro. I’m also thankful for cilantro in general.

Beavis and Butthead: This is kind of a two-part thankfulness item. I’m thankful that Beavis and Butthead are back on TV because Beavis and Butthead are hilarious. I don’t know if you’ve caught any of the new episodes, but I find myself laughing nearly as hard and as often as I did when they ran the first time, back when I shared an age and general mindset with the show’s heroes.

I guess the thing is that Beavis and Butthead are kind of timeless: A couple of lazy dudes who love explosions and rock and hot women and who enjoy making fun of stuff that sucks. I hear that. And the new version of the show does a really good job sending up the various reality-TV fare airing on MTV these days, which makes sense: How could Beavis and Butthead watch music videos all day today if music videos almost never air anymore? Today’s version of the characters would be (and are) watching Jersey Shore, making fun of it as almost everyone who watches Jersey Shore does.

And that the show has remained funny upon its return gives me hope for the forthcoming fourth season of Arrested Development, which was announced last week. Since the first three-season run of that show was as close to perfect as anything I’ve ever seen on television, I’ve been a little nervous that the long-rumored movie or this newly announced fourth season could sully (in my opinion, at least) the show’s legacy. But if Mike Judge could pull off what appears to be a successful return, maybe Mitch Hurwitz and the folks responsible for Arrested Development will too.

Sandwiches as art

With Scanwiches I wanted to celebrate the remarkable qualities of one of my favorite foods, sandwiches. They’re these beautiful and personal objects that are easily forgotten or ignored. They have these architectural qualities, they’re constructed, not just made, that’s cool to me and I wanted to expose their intricacies.

I also love that they hold so many stories. Everybody eats food, and a lot of people eat sandwiches and for every sandwich there is some story.

Sandwiches like the hamburger tell us about the shaping of a nation. Individual sandwiches can jog a long-forgotten childhood memory like the smell of 3rd grade or that time we puked in the cafeteria in kindergarten. Deeply personal and important stories hide between those layers of bread.

Jon Chonko.

This, so hard. The Scanwiches exhibit at JS55 just catapulted to the top of my list of things to see in New York in the coming weeks. I’ll certainly report back.

Via dpecs.

Matt Kemp badass

I’m going to go 50-50 next year. I’m telling you, y’all created a monster. I’m about to get back in the weight room super tough so I can be as strong as I was last year. … Forty-forty is tough, so 50-50 will be even tougher, but anything can happen. I have to set my limits high so I can try to get to them as much as I can. I’m going to try for 50-50, which has never been done. I’m serious. If I don’t [get there], it means I let y’all down and lied to you, and I don’t like being a liar. I know y’all are over there thinking I’m crazy, but hey, I’m trying to take it to another level.

Matt Kemp.

Awesome. I’m not sure I’ve mentioned it in this space, but Kemp’s one of my favorite players in the league. I was pretty disappointed to hear about his contract extension because it dashed my dreams of the Mets’ signing him next offseason, even if I knew how unlikely that was to begin with. The absurd terms of the deal made it a little more palatable, but still. Man is Matt Kemp sweet.

Via Big League Stew.

Lists are stupid but Jimi Hendrix was sweet

[Jimi Hendrix] seamlessly weaves chords and single-note runs together and uses chord voicings that don’t appear in any music book. His riffs were a pre-metal funk bulldozer, and his lead lines were an electric LSD trip down to the crossroads, where he pimp-slapped the devil.

Tom Morello.

One of these Top-100-guitarists-ever lists comes out every few years, and every time I read them even knowing that I think most lists are stupid, and then I find myself nitpicking with the rankings, questioning the standards by which the list is made and doubting the integrity of the entire project. And such is the case with the most recent one, at Rolling Stone.

The upside to this one is that it doesn’t seem too strongly tilted toward technical wizardry in lieu of creativity, as these lists often are. But it does seem to give too much credence to guys who were great songwriters that happened to play the guitar. I mean, it’s going to take you a hell of a lot of time to convince me that Kurt Cobain is a better guitar player than Eddie Hazel. And if you want to tell me that The Edge is better than John McLaughlin at anything worth being good at, you’re probably arguing in vain.

And the point I always make when these lists come out — to anyone who will listen, at least — is that there are a ton of session dudes and basement shredders none of us have ever heard of who can likely play with nearly anyone on this list. And you could say, “oh well yeah, but maybe they’re not as creative,” but success in music seems so eminently random that I wouldn’t be surprised if they are. So I think “Greatest” here actually means something closer to “most influential,” which doesn’t make for as strong of a list title.

Jimi Hendrix was awesome though. No beef with that choice. And really I just wanted to pass along the quote from Morello, who is also pretty awesome (and also on the list).

Apparently before he died, Hendrix hatched plans to record an album with Miles Davis. That stands as about the best reason I can think of to hope for some sort of afterlife.

Reconstituted Meat

I’ve been thinking more about Patrick Flood’s “Too Much Bacon” post from the other day — not the down-the-road stuff about paying for Web content so much as Flood’s very valid point that the glut of hot-stove information is overwhelming and very likely driven by the pursuit of page views.

And it led me to another food metaphor, or at least a food-related metaphor. Anyone remember this incredible sequence from Jamie Oliver’s Food Revolution?

Every part of it is amazing, obviously. Oliver thinks he’s going to shock these kids out of eating chicken nuggets, so he shows them the disgusting way in which some processed chicken nuggets are made. The kids appear duly grossed out until he puts the nuggets in front of them, when they all ultimately admit they’re hungry and want to eat the nuggets no matter how they were prepared.

So when considering the way I want to approach this blog during the hot-stove season, since it is nominally a sports blog affiliated with a sports network and since I do want to maintain some sort of sports-based bent on this site, I wonder: Who do I want to be, in this equation?

I don’t have the stomach to peddle nutritionally devoid nuggets to the hungry masses, no matter how tempting the profit line. And though I can understand the urge to scarf down those nuggets, I don’t really want to be the children either, chewing up and digesting everything in sight without considering the source.

But I also have no strong desire to be Jaime Oliver, tilting at windmills, preaching in vain to try to prevent people from catering to their most base instincts.

Most of my heroes are, well, trolls — those content to remain detached from the action and make fun of it. That probably reflects poorly on me, but it is what it is. Oliver’s show and this segment were introduced to me by Stephen Colbert, whose take on the nuggets bit was absolutely perfect.

All of that is a long-winded, sausage-factory (and excuse the mixed food metaphor) way of saying I probably shouldn’t ignore all the hot-stove stuff even if I think most of it is tiresome. And I think most consumers of offseason rumors would admit that they recognize how few of them come to pass and how little it all means, sort of like the way Oliver’s nugget-eating children guiltily smirk away their trans-fatty transgressions.

So I want to start indulging just a few of a the rumors a couple of times a week here: To examine their sources, their likelihood, and their potential benefits to the actors involved. Because hey, it’s baseball. It’s supposed to be fun. And we’re hungry.

I’ll probably settle into some sort of regular format eventually. Or I’ll get bored with the whole thing and scrap it entirely. Who knows? Check back often to find out!

Here we go:

Wait, but are the A’s also talking about it or are the Reds simply talking about it amongst themselves? And are we talking the Reds’ front-office decision-maker types here, or just like, members of the Reds, sitting around talking about how great it would be if they could make a deal for Andrew Bailey because they heard he makes awesome chili or is easy to fleece in poker or something?

Oh wait! The A’s are very willing to trade Bailey. Maybe the chili gives you disgusting gas. Actually the odds of Bailey being traded are about 100 percent, and he’s even more available than Gio Gonzalez — which makes sense because Gonzalez is younger, way better and under team control for longer, and maybe also, you know, seeing someone.

Anyway, it strikes me that maybe the A’s would be best served hanging on to Bailey, not just to troll reporters everywhere but also because there are a slew of free-agent closer options available this winter — many of whom are coming off injury or frequently injured. Let all those chips fall where they may, then when the chips get hurt, you’re holding the only chip. That’s just Moneyball, or something.

Oof, half dozen teams.

Jack Wilson can’t hit at all. I’ll confess I haven’t seen a ton of Wilson the last couple years and I don’t put too much stock in small-sample UZR data, but he’ll be 34 on Opening Day and he’d have to be among the best defensive middle infielders in baseball to be worth carrying his bat.

Seems hard to believe a half dozen teams would have more than a passing interest in the man, except maybe on a Minor League deal or in terms of like, “oh hey Jack Wilson’s still going? That’s interesting.” Of course it’s certainly possible, because more than a half dozen teams have done stranger things.

Red Sox sign Chorye Spoone: Wait, that’s a real guy? Dickens team? Dickens team.

Obligatory. Lyrics NSFW:

Mets sign Adam Loewen

The Mets have signed outfielder Adam Loewen to a Minor League deal. OH START PLANNING THE WORLD CHAMPIONSHIP PARADE NOW I AM SO SMART AND FUNNY! I’M TOTALLY BUYING SEASON TIX CUZ THEY SIGNED ADAM LOEWEN GET IT GUYS LOL? MORE LIKE LOESEN!

Seriously though, this is a nice move.

Loewen came up through the Orioles’ system as a big-time pitching prospect before enduring elbow problems and related control issues and flaming out after 164 pretty bad Major League innings. He became a full-time position player in 2009, manning the outfield corners and first base.

That year, Loewen posted a .236/.340/.355 line in 391 plate appearances in High A ball. The next year, Loewen hit .246/.351/.412 in 537 PAs in Double-A. In 2011, he hit .306/.377/.508 in 585 PAs in Triple-A.

Notice anything?

The 2011 line happened in the Pacific Coast League in Las Vegas, which is about the best place in the world to hit. So that should be taken with about the Dead Sea’s worth of salt. But here’s a guy who had all of two professional plate appearances from 2003-2008 and managed to not embarrass himself in 2009, then improved in 2010 and 2011.

Hell, look at it this way:

Year BB% SO% ISO
2009 12.8 29.2 0.119
2010 12.3 26.4 0.166
2011 10.4 23.2 0.202

So he’s not walking more, but Loewen has struck out less and hit for more power as he has advanced. Some of that has to do with the park and the PCL, for sure. But because he’s so new to being a full-time professional position player, Loewen’s a good upside play for the Mets on a Minor League deal. I don’t know anything about Loewen’s defense and the Mets already have a couple of good lefty-hitting corner guys in Daniel Murphy and Lucas Duda. But hey, the more the merrier.

On A Very Harold and Kumar 3D Christmas, briefly

I saw A Very Harold and Kumar 3D Christmas and found it pretty awesome. Out of curiosity, I read some of the reviews online this morning and I thought a lot of them missed the mark.

Most of them focused on the plot, which is more or less what you’d expect from a Harold and Kumar Christmas movie: Holiday-themed stoner hijinks, framed by the now-rich Harold’s search for a Christmas tree to impress his terrifying father-in-law after the still-slacking Kumar burns his down. For much of the movie Harold and Kumar aren’t really friends, which is at least vaguely interesting.

But the movie’s real appeal, to me, lied in its comic exploitation of the 3D medium. Early on there’s a wink-wink moment in which Harold’s assistant details the merits of 3D television — which did not at all jump the shark — and from there, the movie endeavors various trippy sequences clearly aimed at making full use of the technology: an egging, a hallucinogenic claymation romp, a commercial for a waffle-making robot, and backstories told in partly animated comic-book style.

It’s all pretty gimmicky (and the movie makes no effort to pretend otherwise), but it makes for an excellent visual spectacle and a compelling case to shell out for tickets to see it in its intended form. I found myself laughing more at the cinematographical (is that a word?) humor than anything any of the characters said.

I didn’t see Jackass 3D, but Harold and Kumar made a pretty good case for the way 3D can and should be used in comedies. It requires something of an adjustment on the part of the audience, perhaps, and funny things flying off the screen at you aren’t the type of movie moments you’re going to be able to quote long after seeing them. But I had a hell of a lot of fun watching it.

So how old is Albert Pujols really?

Over at Baseball Nation, Rob Neyer and Jason Brannon debate whether Albert Pujols could be older than his listed age.

Brannon — arguing that he is older — makes one very good point: If Pujols were admittedly 17 or older when he immigrated, he would have been ineligible for high-school baseball and thus unable to put his ridiculous awesomeness* on display for college coaches.

But Brannon keeps coming back to a couple of silly arguments, namely that Pujols supposedly lied to his wife about his age to get a date, and that there must have been a reason so many scouts missed on Pujols.

Telling little lies in pursuit of the opposite sex is a tradition that long pre-dates Pujols’ entrance to this country, and is in my opinion very, very different than lying about your age for professional gain. Not that it necessarily means Pujols didn’t lie about his baseball age, only that the two things probably have nothing to do with each other.

And as for the scouts, they straight-up screwed up. Even if Pujols were several years older than he claimed to be, he was still destined for a Hall of Fame career. Say Pujols is, I don’t know, 40 years old right now. Say he was 28 when he was playing JUCO ball in 1999 and 30 when he was ranked the 42nd best prospect by Baseball America. He was still on the brink of dominating Major League pitching for at least 11 seasons. That’s a massive whiff by scouts everywhere, no matter how old he was.

Also, Brannon notes that Pujols’ OPS+ has been in decline for four straight seasons, which is true. What he fails to mention is that the first two of those — 2008 and 2009 — were the best two of Pujols’ career by that stat, and they correspond with what are supposedly his age 28 and 29 seasons. So nothing really out of the ordinary there.

There’s certainly plenty of empirical evidence to suggest Pujols is older than he says he is: He looks it. But there were two dudes in my middle school with a full meadow of chest hair by seventh grade. (I know because their gym lockers were on either side of mine and it made me very uncomfortable.) Maybe Pujols is just one of those pubert guys, as unlikely as it seems.

Finally, I wonder to what extent it matters. Pujols is such a bizarre outlier in terms of talent and consistency and healing ability that maybe there’s some chance he is 35 and he’ll still be pretty awesome six or seven years from now anyway.

Or maybe he’s actually 31 and he’ll start falling apart sooner regardless. Until we have more concrete evidence, this is all just speculation — some of which might factor into some teams’ decisions while pursuing him on the open market, but none of which should affect the way we appreciate the tremendous things he has been doing for the last 11 seasons.

*- But the ridiculous awesomeness itself probably does not hold up as evidence of Pujols’ advanced age. This is Albert Pujols we’re talking about, no? We’ve all seen the Bryce Harper video, and Harper hasn’t yet proven to be a Top 10 All Time hitter. Smart money says Albert Pujols looked pretty damn impressive playing baseball at every age. And there are plenty of stories of various future greats needing to show birth certificates in Little League.

Rocky, Das Musical

Rocky, the musical version of the Oscar-winning boxing movie, will get its world premiere at the Operettenhaus in Hamburg, Germany, in November 2012, producers Stage Entertainment, Sylvester Stallone and Vitali & Wladimir Klitschko announced….

Steven Hoggett (Black Watch, American Idiot, Peter and the Starcatcher, Once) will handle the boxing choreography. Kelly Devine (Rock of Ages) is choreographer of the more traditional musical numbers in the show that composer Flaherty called a kind of “visceral …street opera.” In addition to offering intimate songs, the show also has its moments of “gladiatorial spectacle,” Timbers said on camera….

The production (to premiere using the German language) is billed on the Stage Entertainment website as Rocky, Das Musical, Fight From the Heart.

Kenneth Jones, Playbill.com.

Sometimes you just want to excerpt the whole article. Holy hell.

OK so maybe I’m reading this wrong, but please tell me this means there’s soon going to be a production of a musical version of Rocky called Rocky, Das Musical IN GERMAN produced in part by Sly Stallone and the Klitschkos featuring “Eye of the Tiger” and described by its composer as a “visceral street opera.”

You all saw that too, right? This isn’t just like one of those I-swear-I-saw-Sasquatch-in-the-corner-of-my-eye things, right?

Right?

And please, please tell me you have booked me a flight to Hamburg for next November, where we will laugh and sing and eat sausage and drink beer from steins and enjoy the world’s first and foremost Rocky-inspired “gladiatorial spectacle.”

Mmm, Hamburg.

Also, if this is eventually coming to Broadway, they’re going to need a star who can sing in an Italian accent, and preferably in the Rocky voice. I mean, you figure that’s non-negotiable. Some Julliard-trained twit steps on stage as Rocky and belts out heartfelt duets with Paulie in a pitch-perfect but silken Midwestern baritone and half the house is walking out, I promise you that.

No audience is more hellbent on authenticity than the contemporary Broadway crowd. It’s an underreported fact that during previews for The Addams Family a deranged madman fired on Nathan Lane for portraying Gomez with a slight Andalusian accent instead of the traditional Castilian.

Point being, if they’re looking for someone to convincingly sing in an Italian accent, I’m your guy. I’ve only been in two musicals in my life but both times I played a character that sung in an Italian accent. Neither sounded like Sly, but I’ll work on it. And as for the fight choreography, I’m a terrible dancer. But if you mean to make it anything like Rocky, I assume you’ll want your star at the business end of an almost inconceivable number of poorly defended headshots. I can do that too. People love punching me in the face.

Also, if that doesn’t pan out: What about Rocky, Das Musical: The Musical? It’s a musical about making a German musical version of Rocky. Crazy meta. It’ll kill on off-off-Broadway. I can be the guy who plays Rocky in the play within the play. Give me a couple of months to get in shape. If you want to film training montages let me know.

Huge hat tip to Meredith for the news.